Multicenter randomized phase II clinical trial of preoperative chemoradiotherapy by S-1 versus UFT to rectal cancer for personalized therapy (UMIN ID: 000001704).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 499-499
Author(s):  
Takashi Iwata
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Pathological Response ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii

499 Background: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in rectal cancer reduces the local recurrence rate after operation and preserves the anus, but it is difficult to predict the effects of CRT. Multicenter randomized phase II clinical trial of preoperative chemoradiotherapy by S-1 vs UFT for rectal cancer was conducted to compare the toxicity and efficacy of CRT using oral DPD-inhibitory fluoropyrimidines (UFT versus S-1, (UMIN ID: 000001704)) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: In this randomized phase II study, during April 2008 to October 2010, rectal cancer patients (n=59) who underwent preoperative CRT were randomly divided into two groups; S-1 group (n=30, 80 mg/m2/day, 5 days/w x 4 w), and UFT (n=29, 300 mg/m2/day, 5 days/w x 4 w). Both groups were combined with 40Gy radiotherapy (2 Gy ×5 days/w × 4 weeks,total 40 Gy). The pathological response rate, clinical response rate by RECIST, and frequency of adverse events of CRT were compared between S-1 group and UFT group. Results: Response to CRT determined by histopathologic examination of surgically resected specimens and RECIST were as follows: responders (grade 2 or 3) were 60% (S-1) and 52% (UFT) (p=0.52). S-1 group showed 54% of response rate in pathological response, whereas UFT group showed 45% (p=0.43). In adverse events, frequence of Grade 2 and 3 diarrhea was significantly higher in S-1 group compared with UFT group. There was no difference between the two groups in compliance (S-1group: 83%, UFT group: 97%). Conclusions: Both S-1 and UFT were safely used for preoperative CRT. S-1 tended to show higher response rate than UFT, although diarrhea in S-1 was higher than in UFT. Clinical trial information: 000001704.

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Multicenter phase II clinical trial.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14612-e14612
Author(s):  
Takahiro Hiratsuka ◽  
Tomonori Akagi ◽  
Shinichiro Empuku ◽  
Kentaro Nakajima ◽  
Yoshitake Ueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Trial ◽  
Multicenter Phase

Phase II trial PD-L1/PD-1 blockade avelumab with chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced resectable T3B-4/N1-2 rectal cancer: The Ave-Rec trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3622-TPS3622
Author(s):  
Michael Michael ◽  
Rachel Wong ◽  
Sanjeev Singh Gill ◽  
David Goldstein ◽  
Sam Ngan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Sample Size ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Fdg Pet ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathological Response ◽  
Pelvic Mri ◽  
Distant Relapse

TPS3622 Background: Standard neoadjuvant long course chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) results in a complete pathological response rate of 10-30%: but 20-40% of patients (pts) are non-responders, 10-15% have local recurrence. Tumoural immune infiltrates are predictive of response. Preclinical studies show that radiotherapy (RT) via interferon signaling is immuno-stimulatory, enhancing local/distant tumour cell death. RT also stimulates PDL1 production and the immunosuppressive activity of myeloid derived suppressor cells. Hence PDL1 inhibition may be required to enhance the immuno-stimulatory effects of RT. Hypothesis: In pts with resectable LARC, the anti-PDL1 antibody Avelumab post LCCRT may enhance the pathological/imaging response rates whilst potentially reducing local/distant relapse rates. Methods: (1) Trial Design: Phase II single arm trial, across 6 Australian sites (2) Endpoints: (a) Primary; Pathological response rate post-LCCRT, as documented by central pathologist, (b) Secondary; MRI/FDG PET imaging responses at 8 weeks post LCCRT (pre-surgery). Toxicity. (c) Exploratory; Tumoural immune cell subsets/checkpoint expression (by multiplex immunohistochemistry and in-vitro functional assays) and ctDNA analysis at baseline and during treatment. Distant relapse-free survival and the documentation of sites of relapse. (3) Sample size: An increase in the proportion of pathological complete responses by > 25% (from 10% to 35%) will be considered clinically important. Power = 90%, α = 0.05, 41 pts are required– an additional 4 pts to allow for drop-out. Total sample size = 45pts. Treatment: All pts to receive standard LCCRT (50.4Gy RT plus 5FU [225mg/m2/day/CI] or Capecitabine [825mg/m2 BID on RT days] over 5.5 weeks). Post LCCRT (prior to surgery), pts receive 4 cycles Avelumab (10mg/kg, q2 weeks). Surgical resection 10-12 weeks post LCCRT. Fresh tumour biopsy and ctDNA sampling pre LCCRT, pre Cycle 1 Avelumab and at surgery. Response by FDG PET and pelvic MRI pre surgery. Pts to be followed up for 2 years. Major Inclusion Criteria: Pts with LARC, MRI stage T3b-4/N1-2/M0, planned for LCCRT followed by curative resection, tumoural lower border within 12cm from the anal verge, measurable disease (RECIST1.1), ECOG 0-1, adequate organ function and no contraindications to Avelumab therapy. Current Enrolment: 11 of the planned 45 patients enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03299660.

NRG-GI002: A phase II clinical trial platform for total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in rectal cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3629-TPS3629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. George ◽  
Greg Yothers ◽  
Theodore S. Hong ◽  
Marcia McGory Russell ◽  
Y. Nancy You ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
High Risk Patient ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy

TPS3629 Background: Improvements in outcomes for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) have plateaued due to an inability to consistently deliver adjuvant therapy (tx) and thus far ineffective novel therapies. Systematic testing of new chemotherapy and radiation sensitizers are needed to advance treatment outcomes. This randomized phase II modular clinical trial platform utilizes Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) with parallel experimental arms in LARC. The experimental arms are not intended for direct comparison, but to test a variety of sensitizers or hypotheses in a consistent and relatively homogenous high-risk patient (pt) population with correlative biomarkers. Success of any given experimental arm will be determined by achievement of pathologic endpoints compared to a control arm. Methods: This NCTN multi-arm randomized phase II trial serves as a modular platform to assess novel sensitizers to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy (chemoRT) in LARC. Eligibility includes LARC as defined by any ONE of the following criteria: distal location (cT3-4 ≤5cm from the anal verge, any N); bulky (any cT4 or tumor within 3mm of the mesorectal fascia); high risk for metastatic disease (cN2); or not a candidate for sphincter-sparing surgical resection. After randomization, pts receive neoadjuvant FOLFOX x 4mo → chemoRT (capecitabine with 50.4Gy) → surgical resection 8-12 wks later. Based on promising phase I results, the first experimental arm will assess the activity of veliparib added to standard chemoRT (capecitabine + RT). Primary endpoint is to demonstrate improvement in Neoadjuvant Rectal Cancer (NAR) score for the experimental arm vs control representing 20% relative risk reduction in DFS HR and 3-4% absolute OS improvement. Secondary endpoints include comparisons of OS, DFS, toxicity, pCR, cCR, tx completion, negative surgical margins, sphincter preservation, sphincter function including quality of life, and exploratory assessments of molecular and radiographic predictors of response and distant failure. Target accrual is 79 evaluable pts per arm with additional arms added through rolling protocol amendments. NCT02921256. Support: U10 CA-180868, -20, 21, -22; UG-189867; AbbVie. Clinical trial information: NCT02921256.

Multicenter phase II clinical trial of preoperative capecitabine with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 294-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel de las Heras ◽  
Fernando Arias ◽  
Rosario del Moral-Avila ◽  
Jaime Gómez-Millán ◽  
Encarnación Jiménez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Trial ◽  
Concurrent Radiotherapy ◽  
Multicenter Phase

Utilizing total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in rectal cancer: NRG-GI002, a phase II clinical trial platform.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS814-TPS814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. George ◽  
Greg Yothers ◽  
Theodore S. Hong ◽  
Marcia McGory Russell ◽  
Y. Nancy You ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Neoadjuvant Therapy ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
High Risk Patient ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy

TPS814 Background: Improvements in outcomes for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) have plateaued due to an inability to consistently deliver adjuvant therapy and thus far ineffective novel therapies. Systematic testing of new chemotherapy and radiation sensitizers are needed to advance treatment outcomes. This randomized phase II modular clinical trial platform utilizes Total Neoadjuvant Therapy (TNT) with parallel experimental arms in LARC. The experimental arms are not intended for direct comparison, but to test a variety of sensitizers or hypotheses in a consistent and relatively homogenous high-risk patient (pt) population with correlative biomarkers. Success of any given experimental arm will be determined by achievement of pathologic endpoints compared to a control arm. Methods: This NCTN multi-arm randomized phase II trial serves as a modular platform to assess novel sensitizers to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy (chemoRT) in LARC. Eligibility includes LARC as defined by any ONE of the following criteria: distal location (cT3-4 ≤5cm from the anal verge, any N); bulky (any cT4 or tumor within 3mm of the mesorectal fascia); high risk for metastatic disease (cN2); or not a candidate for sphincter-sparing surgical resection. After randomization, all pts receive neoadjuvant FOLFOX x 4mo → chemoRT (capecitabine with 50.4Gy) → surgical resection 8-12 wks later. Based on promising phase I results, the first experimental arm will assess the activity of veliparib added to standard chemoRT (capecitabine + RT). Primary endpoint is to demonstrate an improvement in Neoadjuvant Rectal Cancer (NAR) score for the experimental arm vs control representing a 20% relative risk reduction in DFS HR and 3-4% absolute OS improvement. Secondary endpoints include comparisons of OS, DFS, toxicity, pCR, cCR, therapy completion, negative surgical margins, sphincter preservation, sphincter function including quality of life, and exploratory assessments of molecular and radiographic predictors of response and distant failure. Target accrual is 79 evaluable pts per arm with additional arms added through rolling protocol amendments. Support: U10 CA-180868, -180822, UG-189867; AbbVie. Clinical trial information: NCT02921256.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document