Radiological progression of extremity soft tissue sarcoma following preoperative radiotherapy predicts for poor survival

Objectives: To determine if radiological response to preoperative radiotherapy is related to oncologic outcome in patients with extremity soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Methods: 309 patients with extremity STS who underwent preoperative radiation and wide resection were identified from a prospective database. Pre-and post-radiation MRI scans were retrospectively reviewed. Radiological response was defined by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST).Local recurrence-free (LRFS), metastasis-free (MFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared across response groups. Results: Tumour volume decreased in 106 patients (34.3%; PR- Partial Responders), remained stable in 97 (31.4%; SD- Stable Disease), increased in 106 (34.3%; PD- Progressive Disease). The PD group were older (p = 0.007), had more upper extremity (p = 0.03) and high grade tumours (p < 0.001). 81% of myxoid liposarcomas showed substantial decrease in size. There was no difference in initial tumour diameter (p = 0.5), type of surgery (p = 0.5), margin status (p = 0.4), or complications (p = 0.8) between the three groups. There were ten (3.2%) local recurrences with no differences between the three response groups (p = 0.06). Five-year MFS was 52.1% for the PD group versus 73.8 and 78.5% for the PR and SD groups respectively (p < 0.001). OS was similar (p < 0.001). Following multivariable analysis, worse MFS and OS were associated with higher grade, larger tumour size at diagnosis and tumour growth following preoperative radiation. Older age was also associated with worse OS. Conclusion: STS that enlarge according to RECIST criteria following preoperative radiotherapy identify a high risk group of patients with worse systemic outcomes but equivalent local control. Advances in knowledge: Post radiation therapy, STS enlargement may identify patients with potential for worse systemic outcomes but equivalent local control. Therefore, adjunct therapeutic approaches could be considered in these patients.

Impact of Preoperative vs Postoperative Radiotherapy on Overall Survival of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients

BackgroundThe treatment for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) is a severe clinical problem. The postoperative radiotherapy is a conventional treatment method for patients with LABC, whereas the effect of preoperative radiotherapy on outcome of LABC remains controversial. This study aimed to examine and compare the overall survival (OS) in patients with LABC who underwent preoperative radiotherapy or postoperative radiotherapy.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 41,618 patients with LABC from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2010 and 2014. We collected patients’ demographic, clinicopathologic, treatment and survival information. Propensity score was used to match patients underwent pre-operative radiotherapy with those who underwent post-operative radiotherapy. Cox proportional hazard regression model was performed to access the association between variables and OS. Log-rank test was conducted to evaluate the difference in OS between groups.ResultsThe estimated median follow-up of all included participants was 69.6 months (IQR: 42.84-60.22); 70.1 months (IQR: 46.85-79.97) for postoperative radiotherapy, 68.5 (IQR: 41.13-78.23) for preoperative radiotherapy, and 67.5 (IQR: 25.92-70.99) for no radiotherapy. The 5-year survival rate was 80.01% (79.56-80.47) for LABC patients who received postoperative radiotherapy, 64.08% (57.55-71.34) for preoperative radiotherapy, and 59.67% (58.60-60.77) for no radiotherapy. Compared with no radiation, patients receiving postoperative radiotherapy had a 38% lower risk of mortality (HR=0.62, 95%CI: 0.60-0.65, p&lt;0.001), whereas those who received preoperative radiotherapy had no significant survival benefit (HR=0.88, 95%CI: 0.70-1.11, p=0.282). Propensity score matched analysis indicated that patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy had similar outcomes as those treated with postoperative radiotherapy (AHR=1.23, 95%CI: 0.88-1.72, p=0.218). Further analysis showed that in C0 (HR=1.45, 95%CI: 1.01-2.07, p=0.044) and G1-2 (AHR=1.74, 95%CI: 1.59-5.96, p=0.001) subgroup, patients receiving preoperative radiotherapy showed a worse OS than those who received postoperative radiotherapy.ConclusionsPatients with LABC underwent postoperative radiotherapy had improved overall survival, whereas no significant survival benefit was observed in patients receiving preoperative radiotherapy. Preoperative radiotherapy did not present a better survival than postoperative radiotherapy for LABC patients.

Effectiveness of Postoperative or Preoperative Radiotherapy on Prognosis in Patients with Stage II Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Study Based on the SEER Database

Background and Objectives: The research on the therapeutic effect of preoperative radiotherapy (PRRT) for patients with early non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still insufficient, and the impact of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) on the prognosis of patients with early NSCLC remains controversial. We conducted this study to investigate the effect of PORT and PRRT on prognosis for these patients. Materials and Methods: In total, 3640 patients with stage II NSCLC who underwent a lobectomy or pneumonectomy were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Multivariate regression was adopted to identify the independent influence of PORT or PRRT on patients’ prognosis. Subgroup analysis of survival was performed in patients with different combinations of key clinical features. We also used Kaplan-Meier analysis and competitive risk analysis to explore to which extent PORT or PRRT impacted the overall survival and cumulative mortality. Results: PORT was an independent risk factor of NSCLC-specific death among patients with N0 stage (HR, 1.648; 95% CI, 1.309–2.075, p < 0.001) and in N1 stage with <3 positive lymph nodes (HR, 2.698; 95% CI, 1.910–3.812, p < 0.001) in multivariate analysis. Findings from subgroup analysis for the risk of NSCLC-specific death, competitive risk analysis of NSCLC-specific cumulative mortality, and overall survival analysis also demonstrated PORT was detrimental to patients in these two subgroups above (p < 0.05). However, in patients with N1 stage with ≥3 positive lymph nodes, PORT may help prolong median survival. PRRT was an independent risk factor for NSCLC-specific death in multivariate analysis of patients with N0 stage (HR, 1.790; 95% CI, 1.201–2.668, p = 0.004), and significantly decreased overall survival in these patients (p < 0.001). Conclusion: PORT is associated with worse survival outcome and better cumulative mortality of stage II patients of NSCLC with N0 disease or N1 disease (<3 nodes), while PRRT is associated with reduced prognosis in patients with N0 stage. On the other hand, PORT may help to improve the prognosis of patients with N1 stage who have three or more lymph node metastases. Hence, PORT and PRRT should not be recommended for patients with N0 stage. However, in patients with “high volume” N1 stage, PORT might improve oncological outcomes.

Preoperative vs postoperative radiotherapy in the management of rectal cancer: A systematic review

Purpose. The objective of this study is to review randomized clinical trials systematically that compare the outcomes of preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy in the management of rectal cancer regarding locoregional recurrance, disease free survival and overall survival.Methods. The relevant randomized clinical trials are searched via online databases such as Pubmed, Ebsco, and Proquest. RCTs publised in English between 2000 until 2020 are selected and reviewed systematically.Result. Locoregional recurrence at 5 years was statistically lower in preoperative radiotherapy group than in postoperative radiotherapy group based on two studies. Disease free survival at 5-years was statistically higher in preoprative radiotherapy group than the postoperative one based on two studies. Overall survival at 5 years was not statistically significant between two groups for each study.Conclusion. Preoperative radiotherapy is superior to postoperative radiotherapy for controlling locoregional recurrence and disease free survival, but both are equal in overall survival.

The Correlation Between Survival Benefit of Preoperative Radiotherapy and Pretreatment Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

BackgroundPreoperative radiotherapy followed by radical surgery is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer; however, its long-term survival benefit remains controversial. This study aimed to determine the relationship between pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels and the long-term prognosis of preoperative radiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients.MethodsData of LARC patients who underwent surgery between 2011 and 2015 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, and patients were accordingly divided into surgery (S) group and radiotherapy followed by surgery (RT+S) group. The primary outcomes were cancer-specific survival (CSS) and cancer-specific mortality (CSM). CSS was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, while CSM was evaluated using a competitive risk model. Subgroup analysis was also conducted, which was stratified by pretreatment CEA levels.ResultsA total of 2,760 patients were eligible for this study, including 350 (12.7%) patients in the S group and 2,410 (87.3%) in the RT+S group. There were no significant differences in the CSS and CSM rates at 1, 3, and 4 years between the S and RT+S groups before and after PSM (all p &gt; 0.05). Pretreatment CEA levels were independently associated with CSS and CSM after adjusting for age, sex, stage, pathological factors, and treatment factors (all p &lt; 0.05). Subgroup analysis showed that preoperative radiotherapy would benefit patients with elevated CEA in terms of CSS and CSM (both p &lt; 0.05) but not those patients with normal CEA (both p &gt; 0.05). Further analysis showed that preoperative radiotherapy was an independent protective factor for CSS and CSM in patients with elevated CEA levels (both p &lt; 0.05).ConclusionsPretreatment CEA level may be considered a potential biomarker to screen LACR patients who would benefit from preoperative radiotherapy in terms of long-term prognosis.

Analysis of risk factors for presacral abscess after radical resection of middle and low rectal cancer.

Background and ObjectivesTo investigate the risk factors of presacral abscess after radical resection of middle and low rectal cancer. MethodsClinical data of 2279 patients with middle and low rectal cancer in the department of Colorectal Surgery at the Changhai Hospital of the Second Military Medical University from January 2015 to December 2018 were analyzed retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to find the risk factors of presacral abscess using Chi-square test and Logistic regression, respectively. ResultsThe median age of all cases was 62 years. Of the 27 cases with presacral abscess, 22 were males and 5 were females. 12 cases were low rectal cancer and 15 cases were middle rectal cancer. Univariate Chi-square test indicated that the relative factors associated with the presacral abscess were tumor size, operative time, blood loss, T stage lesions, receiving preoperative radiotherapy and with preventive terminal ileostomy. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size, operative time, blood loss, receiving preoperative radiotherapy and with preventive terminal ileostomy were the independent risk factors. ConclusionsPatients with big tumor size, long operative time, high blood loss and preoperative radiotherapy are high-risk groups of presacral abscess after radical resection of middle and low rectal cancer.