Long- and short-acting opioids in cancer pain management: What is the best ratio?

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 206-206
Author(s):  
Alison Wiesenthal ◽  
Natalie Moryl ◽  
Paul A. Glare

206 Background: Many cancer patients experience chronic and breakthrough pain necessitating the use of both immediate release (IR) and extended release (ER) opioids. The common strategy in treating chronic cancer pain is using ER opioids with the addition of IR opioids for breakthrough pain. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends IR dosing at 0.1-0.2 times the daily ER dose as needed every 1 hour for breakthrough pain, though data is lacking to validate this recommendation. The aim of this exploratory study was to review the current practice in prescribing IR and ER opioids and the IR/ER ratio used in cancer pain management at one comprehensive cancer center (CCC). Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of 54 consecutive patients at a CCC over a 6 month period. IR/ER doses, dose adjustments and satisfaction with analgesia were recorded. Adjustments in treatment plans were made based on patients' report of effectiveness and side effects associated with ER and IR opioids. Results: 19 of 54 (35%) patients reported adequate analgesia, with the average daily prescribed IR/ER ratio of 0.6 (range 0 to 3.75). In this group, IR opioids were unchanged during the clinic visit. The ER opioids, on average, were also unchanged, though decreased by 25% and increased by 50% in a few cases over serial clinic visits. Of those patients reporting suboptimal analgesia during the clinic visit (65%), 80% had their ER opioids increased, 6% had IR opioids increased, and 9% had both IR and ER increased. The ER opioids were increased by 40% on average and IR by 11% with the average IR/ER ratio changing from 0.5 (range 0-2) to 0.37 (range 0-1.13). Conclusions: These preliminary data highlight the great variability between patient preferences and clinician decisions in terms of IR/ER opioid ratios. In this retrospective study, analgesia was better in the group using higher IR doses with a higher IR/ER ratio. At the same time, patients with suboptimal analgesia had their ER opioids titrated faster and higher than the IR opioids. More studies are needed to determine best practice in the prescribing of long and short acting opioids for management of chronic cancer pain.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (34_suppl) ◽  
pp. 201-201
Author(s):  
Ali Haider ◽  
Yu Qian ◽  
Zhanni Lu ◽  
Syed Mussadiq Ali Akbar Naqvi ◽  
Amy Zhuang ◽  
...  

201 Background: Recent parenteral opioid shortage (POS) has the potential to impact cancer pain management in hospitalized patients. This study aims to compare changes in the opioid prescriptions by the inpatient palliative care (PC) team before and after the institution first reported the POS. Methods: We reviewed and compared the electronic health records of 386 consecutive eligible consultations seen by the inpatient PC team equally in one month before and after the announcement of POS on February 8, 2018. The eligibility criteria include (1) cancer diagnosis, (2) ≥18 years of age, (3) taking opioid medication at the time of consultation, and (4) having at least two consecutive visits with the PC team. Patient demographics, cancer type, opioid type, route, and dose defined as the morphine equivalent daily dose were assessed. Results: POS was associated with less use of parenteral opioids (patient controlled analgesia, and intravenous breakthrough) and more use of non-parenteral opioids (extended release, transdermal, and oral breakthrough) by the referring oncology teams, and PC team (P≤.001) (Table 1). At first PC follow-up, significantly less proportion of patients achieved better pain control after POS [119/193 (62%) versus 144/193 (75%) (P=.006)] However, at second PC follow-up, the proportion of pain improvement was similar in both cohorts. Conclusions: There is a significant change in opioid routes associated with POS. POS was associated with worse analgesia. More research is needed to better understand the impact of POS on cancer pain management.[Table: see text]


2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 3287-3292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastiano Mercadante ◽  
Costanza Guccione ◽  
Simona Di Fatta ◽  
Valentina Alaimo ◽  
Giovanna Prestia ◽  
...  

1990 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 176-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna R. Williams ◽  
Kelli E. Beaulaurier ◽  
Debbie L. Seal

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.J. Saturno ◽  
I. Martinez-Nicolas ◽  
I.S. Robles-Garcia ◽  
F. López-Soriano ◽  
D. Angel-García

2014 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 586-591 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Hardy ◽  
O. Spruyt ◽  
S. J. Quinn ◽  
L. R. Devilee ◽  
D. C. Currow

2012 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 640-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sewar S. Salmany ◽  
Sara M. Koopmans ◽  
Imad M. Treish ◽  
Rana El Jaber ◽  
Shorouq Telfah ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document