Lapatinib or Trastuzumab Plus Taxane Therapy for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: Final Results of NCIC CTG MA.31

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (14) ◽  
pp. 1574-1583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen A. Gelmon ◽  
Frances M. Boyle ◽  
Bella Kaufman ◽  
David G. Huntsman ◽  
Alexey Manikhas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
First Line ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Human Epidermal Growth Factor ◽  
End Point ◽  
Epidermal Growth

Purpose The efficacy of lapatinib versus trastuzumab combined with taxanes in the first-line setting of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –positive metastatic breast cancer (BC) is unknown. Patients and Methods The MA.31 trial compared a combination of first-line anti-HER2 therapy (lapatinib or trastuzumab) and taxane therapy for 24 weeks, followed by the same anti-HER2 monotherapy until progression. Stratification was by prior (neo)adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy, prior (neo)adjuvant taxane, planned taxane, and liver metastases. The primary end point was intention-to-treat (ITT) progression-free survival (PFS), defined as time from random assignment to progression by RECIST (version 1.0) criteria, or death for patients with locally assessed HER2-positive tumors. The primary test statistic was a stratified log-rank test for noninferiority. PFS was also assessed for patients with centrally confirmed HER2-positive tumors. Results From July 17, 2008, to December 1, 2011, 652 patients were accrued from 21 countries, resulting in 537 patients with centrally confirmed HER2-positive tumors. Median follow-up was 21.5 months. Median ITT PFS was 9.0 months with lapatinib and 11.3 months with trastuzumab. By ITT analysis, PFS was inferior for lapatinib compared with trastuzumab, with a stratified hazard ratio (HR) of 1.37 (95% CI, 1.13 to 1.65; P = .001). In patients with centrally confirmed HER2-positive tumors, median PFS was 9.1 months with lapatinib and 13.6 months with trastuzumab (HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.20 to 1.83; P < .001). More grade 3 or 4 diarrhea and rash were observed with lapatinib (P < .001). PFS results were supported by the secondary end point of overall survival, with an ITT HR of 1.28 (95% CI, 0.95 to 1.72; P = .11); in patients with centrally confirmed HER2-positive tumors, the HR was 1.47 (95% CI, 1.03 to 2.09; P = .03). Conclusion As first-line therapy for HER2-positive metastatic BC, lapatinib combined with taxane was associated with shorter PFS and more toxicity compared with trastuzumab combined with taxane.

scholarly journals Optimum duration of adjuvant trastuzumab in treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 positive early breast cancer: protocol for a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e035802
Author(s):  
Qiancheng Hu ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
Ye Chen ◽  
Xiaofen Li ◽  
Ting Luo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor ◽  
Early Breast Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Human Epidermal Growth Factor ◽  
Epidermal Growth

IntroductionControversy regarding optimum duration of trastuzumab treatment remains in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) positive early breast cancer. The objective of applying network meta-analysis (NMA) is to integrate existing evidence based on direct and indirect comparisons of efficacy and safety, and then to determine the duration of trastuzumab treatments with the greatest impact on therapeutic outcomes in HER2-positive early breast cancers.Methods and analysisElectronic searching of trastuzumab treatments for early breast cancer by titles and abstracts will be conducted for the period from inception to 16 June 2019 in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and ClinicalTrils.gov, as well as the annual meetings of San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium (SABCS), European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) online archives. The outcomes of interest are overall survival, disease-free survival, acceptability, cardiotoxicities and grade 3 to 4 non-haematological toxicities. Two independent reviewers will screen and extract eligible data based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and then assess the risk of bias and evidence quality of individual studies using Cochrane Collaboration’s tool and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). The heterogeneity, transitivity and inconsistency of NMA will be evaluated. In addition, we will perform subgroup and sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness and reliability of findings in our NMA.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required for our NMA. Findings from our NMA will be submitted as peer-reviewed journal manuscripts and international conference reports.Trial registration numberCRD42019139109.

Exploring mechanisms of acquired resistance to HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)-targeted therapies in breast cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 822-830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Creedon ◽  
Adam Byron ◽  
Joanna Main ◽  
Larry Hayward ◽  
Teresa Klinowska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Human Epidermal Growth Factor ◽  
Epidermal Growth

HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2)-targeted therapy in breast cancer is one of the earliest and arguably most successful examples of the modern class of targeted drugs. Initially identified in the 1980s, the observation that HER2 acts as an independent predictor of poor prognosis in the 20% of breast cancer cases carrying a gene amplification or protein overexpression cemented its place at the forefront of research in this field. The outlook for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer has been revolutionized by the introduction of HER2-targeted agents, such as trastuzumab and lapatinib, yet resistance is frequently encountered and multiple different resistance mechanisms have been identified. We have explored resistance to a novel pan-HER inhibitor, AZD8931, and we examine mechanisms of resistance common to trastuzumab, lapatinib and AZD8931, and discuss the current problems associated with translating the wealth of pre-clinical data into clinical benefit.

Lapatinib Combined With Letrozole Versus Letrozole and Placebo As First-Line Therapy for Postmenopausal Hormone Receptor–Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (33) ◽  
pp. 5538-5546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen Johnston ◽  
John Pippen ◽  
Xavier Pivot ◽  
Mikhail Lichinitser ◽  
Saeed Sadeghi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
First Line ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Epidermal Growth

Purpose Cross-talk between human epidermal growth factor receptors and hormone receptor pathways may cause endocrine resistance in breast cancer. This trial evaluated the effect of adding lapatinib, a dual tyrosine kinase inhibitor blocking epidermal growth factor receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), to the aromatase inhibitor letrozole as first-line treatment of hormone receptor (HR) –positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients and Methods Postmenopausal women with HR-positive MBC were randomly assigned to daily letrozole (2.5 mg orally) plus lapatinib (1,500 mg orally) or letrozole and placebo. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the HER2-positive population. Results In HR-positive, HER2-positive patients (n = 219), addition of lapatinib to letrozole significantly reduced the risk of disease progression versus letrozole-placebo (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.96; P = .019); median PFS was 8.2 v 3.0 months, respectively. Clinical benefit (responsive or stable disease ≥ 6 months) was significantly greater for lapatinib-letrozole versus letrozole-placebo (48% v 29%, respectively; odds ratio [OR] = 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2 to 0.8; P = .003). Patients with centrally confirmed HR-positive, HER2-negative tumors (n = 952) had no improvement in PFS. A preplanned Cox regression analysis identified prior antiestrogen therapy as a significant factor in the HER2-negative population; a nonsignificant trend toward prolonged PFS for lapatinib-letrozole was seen in patients who experienced relapse less than 6 months since prior tamoxifen discontinuation (HR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.07; P = .117). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were more common in the lapatinib-letrozole arm versus letrozole-placebo arm (diarrhea, 10% v 1%; rash, 1% v 0%, respectively), but they were manageable. Conclusion This trial demonstrated that a combined targeted strategy with letrozole and lapatinib significantly enhances PFS and clinical benefit rates in patients with MBC that coexpresses HR and HER2.

Phase III Randomized Study Comparing Docetaxel Plus Trastuzumab With Vinorelbine Plus Trastuzumab As First-Line Therapy of Metastatic or Locally Advanced Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Cancer: The HERNATA Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 264-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Andersson ◽  
Elisabeth Lidbrink ◽  
Karsten Bjerre ◽  
Erik Wist ◽  
Kristin Enevoldsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Epidermal Growth Factor ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
First Line ◽  
Human Epidermal Growth Factor ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Epidermal Growth

PurposeTo evaluate docetaxel or vinorelbine, both with trastuzumab, as first-line therapy of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–positive advanced breast cancer.Patients and MethodsPatients naive to chemotherapy for advanced disease were randomly assigned to docetaxel 100 mg/m2day 1 or vinorelbine 30 to 35 mg/m2on days 1 and 8, both combined with trastuzumab (8-mg/kg loading dose and 6-mg/kg maintenance dose) on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP).ResultsA total of 143 patients were randomly allocated to docetaxel, and 141 patients were assigned to vinorelbine. The median TTP for docetaxel and vinorelbine respectively was 12.4 months versus 15.3 months (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.94; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.25; P = .67), median overall survival was 35.7 months versus 38.8 months (HR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.42; P = .98), and the 1-year survival rate was 88% in both arms. Median time to treatment failure for study chemotherapy was 5.6 months versus 7.7 months (HR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.64; P < .0001). The investigator-assessed overall response rate among 241 patients with measurable disease were 59.3% in both arms. More patients in the docetaxel arm discontinued therapy due to toxicity (P < .001). Significantly more treatment-related grade 3 to 4 febrile neutropenia (36.0% v 10.1%), leucopenia (40.3% v 21.0%), infection 25.1% v 13.0%), fever (4.3% v 0%), neuropathy (30.9% v 3.6%), nail changes (7.9% v 0.7%), and edema (6.5% v 0%) were reported with docetaxel.ConclusionThe study failed to demonstrate superiority of any drug in terms of efficacy, but the vinorelbine combination had significantly fewer adverse effects and should be considered as an alternative first-line option.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document