scholarly journals Utilization and impact of surgical technique on the performance of pelvic lymph node dissection at radical prostatectomy: Results from the SEARCH database.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 73-73
Author(s):  
Kathleen F. McGinley ◽  
Xizi Sun ◽  
Lauren E. Howard ◽  
William J. Aronson ◽  
Martha K. Terris ◽  
...  

73 Background: Performance of a pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) with radical prostatectomy (RP) is critical for staging and treatment of high-risk prostate cancer (PC). Conversely, performance of a PLND in low-risk PC contributes to morbidity with minimal benefit. Robot-assisted laparoscopic RP (RARP) is associated with decreased PLND use. We evaluated PLND use over time, stratified by PC risk group and surgical technique. Methods: We used SEARCH to identify men who had open RP (ORP) or RARP from 2006-2013 with complete data. Univariable logistic regression was used to test the association between age, race, BMI, number of positive cores, AUA risk group, year, center, and surgical technique on PLND use. Multivariable logistic analysis was used to examine surgical technique and PLND performance stratified by AUA risk-group. Spearman correlation was used to examine temporal changes in PLND utilization stratified by risk-group and surgical technique. Results: 1,439 men met inclusion criteria. Of these, 66% had a PLND. On univariable analysis, age, year, number of positive cores, AUA risk group, center, and surgical technique were significantly associated with PLND performance (all p<0.02). On multivariable analysis, when adjusted for age, race, BMI, number of positive cores, year, and center, RARP was associated with a 89% decreased use of PLND in the low-risk group, 85% decreased in intermediate risk, and 86% decreased in high risk men (all p≤0.002). Over time, PLND was increasingly used with RARP in low-risk patients (p=0.022); a trend of increased PLND performance with RARP in high risk men was noted (p=0.077) reaching ~85% in 2012-2013 vs. ~95% in ORP. For ORP, PLND use did not significantly change over time except a trend of fewer PLND in low-risk men which decreased to ~35% (p=0.064) in 2012-2013. Conclusions: Regardless of risk group, PLND is markedly less likely to be performed when a RARP is done. While improved over time, PLND remains over-utilized in low-risk men and under-utilized in high risk men regardless of surgical technique.

1992 ◽  
Vol 59 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9-10
Author(s):  
G. Bianchi ◽  
C. Tallarigo ◽  
S. Cavalleri ◽  
D. Schiavone ◽  
P. Beltrami ◽  
...  

From March ‘92 we have introduced laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy as an aid in staging prostatic cancer. In these patients precise lymph node dissection represents an important parameter for therapeutical decision. As regards this problem, up to now, the only efficacious technique was surgical lymphadenectomy. Pelvic lymph node dissection is usually considered to be part of a preliminary operation during radical prostatectomy, but it seems to be an extreme procedure regarding its pure staging finality. For these reasons we believe that laparoscopic lymphadenectomy represents a surgical technique destined to obtain much agreement between urologists. The technique we practise is very similar to the one described by Schuessler et al. Advantages of endosurgical lymph node dissection are mainly minor invasiveness that allows rapid recovery of the patient, together with a reduction of both postoperative morbility and hospitalization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document