13-year oncologic and functional outcomes and morbidity in men

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 121-121
Author(s):  
Daniel Shasha ◽  
Robert Salant ◽  
Ahalya Sivathayalan ◽  
Patrick Farrell ◽  
Philippa Cheetham ◽  
...  

121 Background: Young patients are most often recommended prostatectomy because few radiation series have reported long-term outcomes specifically for this age group. We now address that deficit by presenting single-institution 13-year oncologic outcomes and morbidity after I-125 prostate brachytherapy (BRT). Methods: Between 1998-2014, 227 patients < 55 years were prospectively followed after PCa treatment with BRT +/- external-beam irradiation +/- androgen deprivation. NCCN risk stratification identified 99 low-, 51 intermediate-, 77 high- + very-high-risk patients treated. Endpoints include Phoenix biochemical control (BC), prostate-cancer-specific survival (PCSS), overall survival (OS), and urinary, bowel, and sexual complications. Results: With a minimum and median follow-up of 26 and 72.3 months, respectively the 13-year actuarial rate of BC, PCSS, and OS for low-risk disease: 97.8%, 100%, 100%, respectively; for intermediate-risk disease: 94.0%, 100%, 88.1%, respectively and for high + very-high-risk disease 83.6%, 89.9%, 77.6%, respectively. Only 3 patients died of prostate cancer. Multivariate analysis demonstrated race, EBRT use, ADT use, PSA > 10, PSA > 20, GS > 7, T3a, T3b, smoking, diabetes as significant for BC and PCSS (p < 0.05). Permanent incontinence occurred only in the one patient who underwent TURP, 4 transient urethral strictures were all successfully dilated, and no other grade 3 intestinal or urinary complications were reported. In the 77.5 % potent at baseline, preservation was reported at 5 and 10-years overall in 75.8 % and 54.6 %, and with PDE5-I, 83.3% preserved potency at 10-years. Conclusions: Patients < 55 years achieve excellent and durable prostate cancer control at 13 years after I125 BRT, most notably in high-risk, with prostate cancer specific mortality uncommon in all but very-high-risk group. Significant urinary or bowel morbidity is uncommon, and potency preservation is expected with PDE5-I. We conclude age < 55 years should not be used to discriminate against LDRBT.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 345-345
Author(s):  
Akinori Takei ◽  
Shinichi Sakamoto ◽  
Takaaki Tamura ◽  
Ken Wakai ◽  
Maihulan Maimaiti ◽  
...  

345 Background: Although androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is standard treatment for high risk prostate cancer (PC) patients, the shift of testosterone (TST) levels after ADT and the optimal duration of ADT is unclear. TST recovery and outcome were studied in PC patients who received EBRT with ADT. Methods: Eighty-two patients who underwent EBRT with ADT for PC were retrospectively analyzed. Serum TST levels after ADT terminations were studied. Cox proportional hazard models and the Kaplan-Meier method were used for statistical analysis. Results: Median age, baseline TST, nadir TST, and duration of ADT were 73 years, 456 ng/dL, 16 ng/dL, and 26 months, respectively. ADT duration of 33 months (HR 0.13; p=0.0018), nadir TST of 20 ng/dL (HR 0.35; p=0.0112), and TST >50 ng/dL at 6 months after ADT termination (HR 0.21; p=0.0075) were significantly associated with TST recovery to normal levels (200 ng/dL) on multivariate analysis. ADT duration of 33 months (HR 0.31; p=0.0023) and nadir TST of 20 ng/dL (HR 0.38; p=0.0012) were significantly associated with TST recovery to supracastrate level (50 ng/dL) on multivariate analysis. In high risk PC patients, ADT≤ 2 year group showed shorter time to TST recovery to supracastrate levels compare to those of ADT>2 year group (HR 4.21; p=0.0022) without affecting biochemical recurrence (p=0.49) and overall survival (p=0.674). Conclusions: ADT duration of 33 months and nadir TST of 20 ng/dL predicted the TST recovery to suparacastrate levels. Less than 2 year of ADT provided better TST recovery without affecting the oncological outcome in high risk patients.[Table: see text]


2012 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. e7-e12 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Tiberi ◽  
Jean-François Carrier ◽  
Marie-Claude Beauchemin ◽  
Thu Van Nguyen ◽  
Dominic Béliveau-Nadeau ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle S. Ludwig ◽  
Deborah A. Kuban ◽  
Sara S. Strom ◽  
Xianglin L. Du ◽  
David S. Lopez ◽  
...  

The optimum use of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in high-risk prostate cancer patients has not been defined in the setting of dose-escalated external beam radiation therapy. A retrospective analysis of 1,290 patients with high-risk prostate cancer from June 1987 through March 2010 treated with external beam radiation therapy was performed. Median follow-up was 7.2 years, and 797 patients received ADT, with 384 patients experiencing a biochemical failure and 145 with distant metastasis. ADT was associated with lower risk of biochemical failure and distant metastasis than no ADT after adjusting for age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), Gleason score, year of diagnosis, tumor stage, and radiation dose. ADT was associated with a greater reduction in biochemical failure in the low-dose radiation group than in the high-dose group. Patients with >24 months of ADT had a lower risk of PSA failures than those with <24 months. ADT was associated with decreased risk of biochemical failure and distant metastasis in all patients. The effect of ADT on reducing risk of biochemical failure was greater among men with low-dose radiation. There was a benefit in PSA and distant metastasis-free survival with >24 months of ADT in all patients who received ADT.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document