Partner’s survivorship care needs: Multivariable analysis in head and neck cancer patients.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 120-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meredith Elana Giuliani ◽  
Maurene McQuestion ◽  
Lorna Sampson ◽  
Lisa W Le ◽  
Jennifer M. Jones ◽  
...  

120 Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the number and predictors of head and neck cancer (HNC) survivors’ partners unmet needs and how they correspond to the unmet needs of the survivor. Methods: This study accrued consenting partners from among 158 patients with HNC who had completed a onetime survey including demographic information and the Cancer Survivors’ Unmet Needs Measure (CaSUN) between January 2013 and May 2014. Patients’ caregivers were invited to complete the Cancer Survivors’ Partners Unmet Needs Survey (CaSPUN). The mean (± standard deviation) number and proportion of unmet needs on the CaSPUN was calculated. Multivariable analyses (MVA) were performed to determine factors associated with greater unmet needs using linear regression. Kappa co-efficient was calculated to examine the agreement between the unmet needs of patients and their partners on 22 corresponding items. Results: The CaSPUN survey was completed by 44 partners of head and neck cancer survivors. At least one unmet need was reported by 29 partners and 4 had a very high number of needs between 31 and 35. The most common unmet needs were “I need help to manage my concerns about the cancer coming back” (41%), “I need more accessible hospital parking” (34%), “ I need help to cope with others not acknowledging the impact of having a partner experience cancer has had on my own life” (30%), “ I need help dealing with changes that cancer has caused in my partner” (27%) and “I need to know all my partners doctors talk to each other to coordinate my partner’s care” (27%). Of the 5 most common items, 3 were in the Relationships domain. On MVA increasing number of unmet needs in patients was significantly associated with increased unmet needs in their partners (p < 0.01). Of the 22 paired items there was fair agreement in 12 items, moderate agreement in 8 items and good agreement in 2 items between patients and partners. Conclusions: A significant proportion of partners of cancer patients experience unmet needs which may differ from those of the patient themselves. Survivorship program should consider independent needs assessment and program development for partners.

Dysphagia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacopo Galli ◽  
Maria Raffaella Marchese ◽  
Tiziana Di Cesare ◽  
Laura Tricarico ◽  
Giovanni Almadori ◽  
...  

AbstractDysphagia is common in tracheostomized patients who underwent head and neck surgery for cancer treatment. The objective of this study was to evaluate, by means of oropharyngoesophageal scintigraphy (OPES), the impact of an occluded tracheal tube (TT) on swallowing in patients treated for head and neck cancer before hospital discharge, to provide further information to the benefit of out-patient care management. From October 2018 to November 2019, we enrolled 19 tracheostomized patients (6 females and 13 males; mean age 61 years) who underwent primary surgical resection of head and neck tumor and swallowing rehabilitation during hospitalization. All subjects underwent a double-standard OPES, one with occluded tracheal tube and the other without TT, with their tracheal stoma being closed directly by a plaster. For each study, we assessed and compared the following quantitative parameters: oral transit time (OTTsec), pharyngeal transit time (PTTsec), esophageal transit time (ETTsec), oral retention index (ORI%), pharyngeal retention index (PRI%), esophageal retention index (ERI%), and aspiration percentage (AP%). The mean values of OTT, PTT, ORI%, PRI%, and ERI% were abnormal during OPES both with TT and without TT and did not statistically differ between the two tests (p > 0.05). Aspiration was detected in 4 cases out of 19 (21.05%) cases during OPES with TT and in 4/19 (21.05%) cases without TT who showed a mean AP% of 11.4% and 11.5% respectively (p > 0.05). Patients with abnormal AP% (> 0%) during OPES with TT showed aspiration signs without TT. Our study showed that the mere presence of a closed tracheal tube does not impact significantly the oropharyngeal transit of bolus during swallowing. This result suggests the possibility to maintain a small-diameter occluded tracheal tube in place for the postsurgical management of head and neck cancer patients.


Oral Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 104881 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaili Chen ◽  
Qiuji Wu ◽  
Huangang Jiang ◽  
Yahua Zhong

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 1495-1504 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Alvarez-Camacho ◽  
S. Gonella ◽  
S. Ghosh ◽  
C. Kubrak ◽  
R. A. Scrimger ◽  
...  

Nutrition ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 406-407
Author(s):  
V. Seccia ◽  
I. Dallan ◽  
K. Nardi ◽  
M. La Corte ◽  
F. De Pasquale ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document