Efficacy and safety of Qu Xie capsule in metastatic colorectal cancer: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15069-e15069
Author(s):  
Tong Zhang ◽  
Yufei Yang
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Ming Dynasty ◽  
Conventional Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind

e15069 Background:Qu Xie capsule was discovered by Li Zhongzi, a traditional Chinese Medicine doctor in the Ming Dynasty. Doctor Yang Yufei improved Qu Xie capsule and used it clinically for more than 10 years. In a previous study, we found that Qu Xie capsule reduces the risk of stage II–III colorectal cancer postoperative recurrence and metastasis and prolongs the survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The present clinical trial was designed to verify the efficacy and safety of Qu Xie capsule in patients with mCRC. Methods: The present study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Sixty patients with mCRC were randomized into two groups at a 1:1 ratio. The treatment group received conventional therapy combined with Qu Xie capsule. The control group was treated with conventional therapy combined with placebo. Main outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 121 patients were enrolled and 60 patients were eligible; 54 patients were analyzed. The median OS was 23 months in the treatment group [95% confidence interval (CI) 15–not calculated] vs. 14 months in the control group (95% CI 11–22) (Kaplan–Meier, Log-rank p = 0.060). The OS of the treatment group tended to be longer than that of the control group, although the difference was not significant. This may have been related to the small sample size. In the subgroups of patients < 65 years old, left-sided colon, and ≥second-line therapy, the treatment group showed a significant survival benefit compared with the control group ( p = 0.006, 0.038, 0.013). There were no significant differences between the two groups in PFS. Safety analysis showed no severe hematological toxicity or liver and renal function injury in the treatment group. In the treatment group, one patient had 'abdominal pain' once, which may have been related to the Qu Xie capsule. No other related adverse events were reported. Conclusions:Qu Xie capsule showed good safety and efficacy, and can prolong the OS of patients with mCRC. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR-IOR-16009733.

Efficacy of quxie capsule in metastatic colorectal cancer: Update of a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15030-e15030
Author(s):  
Tong Zhang ◽  
Wenting He ◽  
Yun Xu ◽  
Bin He ◽  
Yufei Yang
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Herbal Medicine ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Chinese Herbal Medicine ◽  
Conventional Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Chinese Herbal

e15030 Background: To verify the efficacy of Quxie Capsule in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Methods: This is a update of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Between April 2014 and July 2015, 121 patients were enrolled in the study. Sixty patients were eligible and randomized to the two groups at a 1:1 ratio. Treatment group received conventional therapy and Chinese herbal medicine combined with Quxie Capsule for 3 months. Control group received conventional therapy and Chinese herbal medicine combined with placebo for 3 months. Main outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). As of Dec 31st 2018, one patient in the control group was still alive, and all the other patients reached the main clinical endpoint. Median follow-up time was 19.4 months. Bo Ao Tong (Beijing) Medical Technology Co. Ltd. was responsible for the protocols of blind and block randomization. Results: The median OS were 23.9 months in the treatment group [95% confidence interval (CI) 15.9–28.5] vs. 14.3 months in the control group (95% CI 11.3–21.4) (Kaplan–Meier, Log-rank P=0.032), hazard ratio (95%CI)= 0.55 (0.31, 0.95), P=0.04. In the subgroups of left-sided colon, RAS wild type, non-targeted therapy, colon cancer and ≥second-line therapy, the median OS of the treatment group and the control group were respectively: 20.9 vs 12.2m, 17.4 vs 14.4m, 20.8 vs 12.0m, 25.1 vs 18.5m, 25.1 vs 12.0m ( P=0.037, 0.019, 0.022, 0.018, 0.007). There were no significant differences between the two groups in PFS. Conclusions: Quxie Capsule showed good efficacy, can reduce the risk of death and prolong the OS of patients with mCRC. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR-IOR-16009733.

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Chuanxiong Qingnao Granule in Patients with Migraine: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yi-Fan Li ◽  
Hui-Min Hu ◽  
Bo-Ning Wang ◽  
Yi Zhang ◽  
Xing Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Group ◽  
Migraine Attack ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Depression Scale ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Hamilton Depression Scale ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Attack Frequency ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo

Objective. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Chuanxiong Qingnao Granule (CQG) to treat migraine. Method. This study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. All migraineurs were recruited and randomly assigned into a treatment group treated with CQG and a control group treated with a placebo. The whole research process included a 4-week baseline, 12-week intervention, and 12-week follow-up. The primary outcome was responder rate, defined as the percentage of migraineurs with 50% or more reduction in the frequency of migraine attack during treatment and posttreatment period compared with the baseline. The secondary outcomes were the number of migraine days, migraine attack frequency, visual analogue scale (VAS), Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS), Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS). Results. A total of 346 migraineurs completed the research and were included in the intention-treatment analyses. The response rates differed significantly between the treatment group and the control group (71.5% vs. 12.1% at week 12 and 83.1% vs. 3.4% at week 24). Attack frequency, days of headache attack, VAS, FSS, HAMD, and MIDAS decreased at week 12 in both groups with more reduction in the treatment group ( P < 0.001 ). No severe adverse events were observed in this trial. Conclusion. Chuanxiong Qingnao Granule can significantly improve headache symptoms in patients with migraine while improving disability, fatigue, and depression with a good safety profile.

scholarly journals Daiobotanpito combined with antibiotic therapy for treatment of acute diverticulitis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiko Ogawa-Ochiai ◽  
Kenichi Yoshimura ◽  
Akiko Shirai ◽  
Seisho Sakai ◽  
Hideki Moriyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Conventional Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Acute Diverticulitis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Abdominal Abscesses ◽  
Intravenous Antibiotics

Abstract Background: Colonic diverticular disease has been increasing in prevalence due to the rapidly aging global population, but standard treatment has not changed dramatically in recent years. Daiobotanpito (DBT; Da Huang Mu Dan Tang in Chinese) has been used in medical treatment of acute abdominal abscesses, such as appendicitis or diverticulitis in traditional Japanese (Kampo) medicine for many years, based on more than 3000 years of experience. Prior to this study, a retrospective open-label trial was conducted to compare patients with acute diverticulitis who received oral DBT combined with intravenous antibiotics with those who received intravenous antibiotic alone; it showed a positive effect of DBT on acute diverticulitis. We aim to investigate whether moderate to severe acute diverticulitis shows greater improvement with intravenous antibiotics plus orally administered DBT compared with intravenous antibiotics with placebo. Methods: This is a two-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial, which is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DBT for moderate to severe diverticulitis patients treated with intravenous antibiotics. Eligible participants will be randomized to either a treatment group receiving a 10-day oral DBT regimen plus conventional therapy or a control group receiving a 10-day placebo regimen plus conventional therapy. The primary outcome will be the rate of fever reduction within 3 days or/and abdominal pain relief within 4 days. Secondary endpoints will include hospitalization days, changes in inflammatory response (CRP, WBC, neutrophil count), thermal type, number of days before beginning food intake, recurrence rate (observation for 1 year after registration), and adverse event expression rate. Assessments will be performed at baseline and on the day of discharge. The recurrence rate will be recorded at 1 year after registration. Discussion: This study is expected to provide evidence to support the clinical benefits of DBT in the treatment of acute diverticulitis. It may also provide evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of DBT in the recurrence of acute diverticulitis. Trial registration: UMIN000027381, registered on April 27th, 2017; https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr/ctr_view_reg.cgi?recptno=R000031377.

scholarly journals Daiobotanpito combined with antibiotic therapy for treatment of acute diverticulitis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiko Ogawa-Ochiai ◽  
Keinichi Yoshimura ◽  
Akiko Shirai ◽  
Seisho Sakai ◽  
Hideki Moriyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Conventional Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Acute Diverticulitis ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Abdominal Abscesses ◽  
Intravenous Antibiotics

Abstract Background: Colonic diverticular disease has been increasing in prevalence due to the rapidly aging global population, but standard treatment has not changed dramatically in recent years. Daiobotanpito (DBT; Da Huang Mu Dan Tang in Chinese) has been used in medical treatment of acute abdominal abscesses, such as appendicitis or diverticulitis in traditional Japanese (Kampo) medicine for many years, based on more than 3000 years of experience. Prior to this study, a retrospective open-label trial was conducted to compare patients with acute diverticulitis who received oral DBT combined with intravenous antibiotics with those who received intravenous antibiotic alone; it showed a positive effect of DBT on acute diverticulitis. We aim to investigate whether moderate to severe acute diverticulitis shows greater improvement with intravenous antibiotics plus orally administered DBT compared with intravenous antibiotics with placebo. Methods: This is a two-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial, which is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DBT for moderate to severe diverticulitis patients treated with intravenous antibiotics. Eligible participants will be randomized to either a treatment group receiving a 10-day oral DBT regimen plus conventional therapy or a control group receiving a 10-day placebo regimen plus conventional therapy. The primary outcome will be the rate of fever reduction within 3 days or/and abdominal pain relief within 4 days. Secondary endpoints will include hospitalization days, changes in inflammatory response (CRP, WBC, neutrophil count), thermal type, number of days before beginning food intake, recurrence rate (observation for 1 year after registration), and adverse event expression rate. Assessments will be performed at baseline and on the day of discharge. The recurrence rate will be recorded at 1 year after registration. Discussion: This study is expected to provide evidence to support the clinical benefits of DBT in the treatment of acute diverticulitis. It may also provide evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of DBT in the recurrence of acute diverticulitis. Trial registration: UMIN000027381, registered on April 27th, 2017 https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr/ctr_view_reg.cgi?recptno=R000031377, and changed to jRCTs041180063, registered on July 30th, 2019; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs041180063

scholarly journals Efficacy and Safety of Proposed Bevacizumab Biosimilar BE1040V in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-blind, Noninferiority Clinical Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
pp. 848-859
Author(s):  
Hamid Rezvani ◽  
Seyed Mohammadreza Mortazavizadeh ◽  
Abolghasem Allahyari ◽  
Amirabbas Nekuee ◽  
Safa Najjar Najafi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind

scholarly journals Study Protocol Daiobotanpito combined with antibiotic therapy for treatment of acute diverticulitis: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiko Ogawa-Ochiai ◽  
Keinichi Yoshimura ◽  
Akiko Shirai ◽  
Seisho Sakai ◽  
Hideki Moriyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Study Protocol ◽  
Conventional Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Acute Diverticulitis ◽  
Treatment Success ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Intravenous Antibiotics

Abstract Background: Colonic diverticular disease has been increasing in prevalence due to the rapidly aging global population, but standard treatment has not changed dramatically in recent years. Daiobotanpito (DBT; Da Huang Mu Dan Tang in Chinese) has been used in medical treatment of acute abdominal abscesses, such as appendicitis or diverticulitis in traditional Japanese (Kampo) medicine for many years, based on more than 3000 years of experience. Prior to this study, a retrospective open-label trial was conducted to compare patients with acute diverticulitis who received oral DBT combined with intravenous antibiotics with those who received intravenous antibiotic alone; it showed a positive effect of DBT on acute diverticulitis. We aim to investigate whether moderate to severe acute diverticulitis shows greater improvement with intravenous antibiotics plus orally administered DBT compared with intravenous antibiotics with placebo. Methods: This is a two-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial, which is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DBT for moderate to severe diverticulitis patients treated with intravenous antibiotics. Eligible participants will be randomized to either a treatment group receiving a 10-day oral DBT regimen plus conventional therapy or a control group receiving a 10-day placebo regimen plus conventional therapy. The primary outcome will be the treatment success rate of diverticulitis defined as fever relief to <37.5 ℃ within 3 days or/and elimination of abdominal pain within 4 days. Secondary endpoints will include hospitalization days, changes in inflammatory response (CRP, WBC, neutrophil count), thermal type, number of days before beginning food intake, recurrence rate (observation for 1 year after registration), and adverse event expression rate. Assessments will be performed at baseline and on the day of discharge. The recurrence rate will be recorded at 1 year after registration. Discussion: This study is expected to provide evidence to support the clinical benefits of DBT in the treatment of acute diverticulitis. It may also provide evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of DBT in the recurrence of acute diverticulitis. Trial registration: UMIN000027381, registered on April 27th, 2017 https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-bin/ctr/ctr_view_reg.cgi?recptno=R000031377, and changed to jRCTs041180063, registered on July 30th, 2019; https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs041180063 as a result of the revision of the domestic law in 2018 in Japan.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of Guhong injection for treating the Coronary microvascular disease: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jieqin Zhuang ◽  
Shuling Liu ◽  
Hairong Cai ◽  
Xingzhen Dai ◽  
Yanhong Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Cardiovascular Diseases ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Microvascular Disease ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Background: Coronary microvascular disease (CMVD) refers to cardiovascular diseases with normal coronary angiography but evidence of myocardial ischemia or microcirculation lesions, often presenting as angina pectoris attack. Coronary artery of microtubules dysfunction is one of the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease,but the occurrence and development and the current of CMVD intervention therapy remains to be further researched.Chinese traditional medicine (TCM)has advantages in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, therefore, this article describes an ongoing randomized controlled clinical trial, based on the theory of TCM, for the purpose of evaluating the efficacy and safety of Guhong injection ,a Chinese patent medicine,compared with placebo in patients suffering from CMVD. Methods/design: This is a multicenter, randomized, parallel arm, open-label, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. A total of 260 eligible patients will be allocated and randomly assigned, in a ratio of 1:1, to either the experimental group or the control group. The treatment course is 10 consecutive days, with a 8-week follow-up. The primary outcome is the frequency of angina attacks, Secondary outcomes include myocardial metabolites, ecg changes, quantitative score of TCM syndromes, inflammatory response and endothelial function indicators. Discussion: This trial is strictly designed in accordance with principles and regulations issued by the China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA). The results will provide high quality evidence on the efficacy and safety of Guhong injection in the treatment of CMVD. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trials Registry, ChiCTR1900022902. Registered on 27 April 2019.

scholarly journals Evaluation on immediate analgesic efficacy and safety of Kai-Hou-Jian spray (children’s type) in treating sore throat caused by acute pharyngitis and tonsillitis in children: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan-ning Ma ◽  
Cheng-liang Zhong ◽  
Si-yuan Hu ◽  
Qiu-han Cai ◽  
Sheng-xuan Guo
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Sore Throat ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Effective Rate ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Acute Pharyngitis ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Parallel Group

Abstract Background Acute pharyngitis and tonsillitis are common respiratory diseases for which children seek medical care. Their main clinical manifestation is sore throat which interferes with patients’ quality of life. However, there is no proven effective or safe method to treat it. It is necessary to find an excellent strategy to reduce sore throat and reduce the burden of acute illness. We designed the randomized controlled trial with the characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) to determine the clinical positioning of Kai-Hou-Jian spray (children’s type) (KHJS) through evidence-based research. This trial aims to evaluate the immediate analgesic efficacy of KHJS on sore throat caused by acute pharyngitis and tonsillitis (wind-heat syndrome/heat exuberance in lung and stomach syndrome) in children and to observe its safety. Methods/design This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. It will include 240 children with acute pharyngitis/tonsillitis from 7 study sites across China. All participants are randomly assigned to two parallel treatment groups, one with KHJS and the other with placebo sprays, for 5 consecutive days. The primary outcome is the time of analgesic onset. Secondary outcomes include duration of analgesic effect, area under time curve of 0–3 h Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (WBS) score (AUC0-3 h), rate of analgesic onset, rate of disappearance of sore throat, changes of WBS score (in days), effective rate of pharyngeal signs, and effective rate of TCM syndrome. The incidence of adverse events during the trial is the primary safety outcome. In addition, vital signs and laboratory tests before and after medication are monitored. Discussion To our knowledge, this will be the first clinical trial to explore the immediate analgesic efficacy of a Chinese patent medicine spray for acute pharyngitis/tonsillitis induced sore throat in children in a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, parallel-group, placebo-controlled manner. Not only might it prove the efficacy and safety of KHJS in the treatment of sore throat caused by acute pharyngitis/tonsillitis in children, but it might also provide evidence for the treatment of acute sore throat with Chinese herbal medicine. Trial registration A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, very low-dose, parallel controlled trial for the immediate analgesic effect and safety of Kai-Hou- Jian spray (children's type) in the treatment of sore throat caused by acute pharyngitis and tonsillitis in children. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000031599. Registered on 5 April 2020

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of duloxetine for postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty in centrally sensitized patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shicheng Wang ◽  
Wensheng Wang ◽  
Long Shao ◽  
Jing Ling
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Postoperative Residual

Abstract Background Postoperative residual knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a significant factor that contributes to patient dissatisfaction. Patients with preoperative central sensitization (CS) may be more susceptible to unexplained chronic pain after TKA, and duloxetine has been reported to be effective in post-TKA pain control in patients with CS. However, there remains limited evidence to support this off-label use in routine clinical practice. Hence, we designed this randomized, placebo-controlled, triple-blind clinical trial to evaluate the effects of preoperative screening and targeted duloxetine treatment of CS on postoperative residual pain compared with the care-as-usual control group. Methods This randomized controlled trial includes patients with knee osteoarthritis on a waiting list for primary unilateral TKA. Patients with preoperative CS will be randomly allocated to the perioperative duloxetine treatment group (duloxetine group) or the care-as-usual control group (placebo group). Patients in the duloxetine group will receive a half-dose of preemptive duloxetine (30 mg/day) for a week before surgery and a full-dose of duloxetine (60 mg/day) for six weeks after surgery. The primary outcome is the intensity of residual pain at six months after TKA, including the visual analogue scale, 11-point numeric rating scale, the sensory dimension of the brief pain inventory, and the pain subscale of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. The secondary outcome measures will include the pain and function related outcomes. All of the patients will be followed up at one, three, and six months after surgery. All adverse events will be recorded and immediately reported to the primary investigator and ethics committee to decide if the patient needs to drop out from the trial. Discussion This clinical trial will convey the latest evidence of the efficacy and safety of the application of duloxetine in postoperative pain control in CS patients who are scheduled for TKA. The study results will be disseminated at national and international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn) registration number: ChiCTR2000031674. Registered 07 April 2020.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document