The role of surgery for stage I small cell lung cancer in recent years: an analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20576-e20576
Author(s):  
Dipesh Uprety ◽  
Lubina Arjyal ◽  
Yazhini Vallatharasu ◽  
Amit Khanal ◽  
Amir Bista
2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 215-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
James B. Yu ◽  
Roy H. Decker ◽  
Frank C. Detterbeck ◽  
Lynn D. Wilson

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liqing Zou ◽  
Tiantian Guo ◽  
Luxi Ye ◽  
Yue Zhou ◽  
Li Chu ◽  
...  

BackgroundPulmonary large cell neuroendocrine cancer (LCNEC) is commonly classified as non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Even for stage I disease, after surgery the survival is always poor, but clinical research on LCNEC is scant and always with unsatisfying sample sizes. Thus, we conduct the first study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to compare survival after surgery between stage I LCNEC and other types of NSCLC.MethodsFrom 2004 to 2016, 473 patients with stage IA LCNEC, 17,669 patients with lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) and 8,475 patients with lung squamous cell cancer (LSCC), all treated with surgery were identified. In addition, 1:1 PSM was used, and overall (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between groups were compared.ResultsThe 5-year OS rates and CSS rates for LCNEC were 52.5% and 81.5%, respectively. Overall, both OS and CSS were significantly superior for stage IA LADC than LCNEC (for OS: HR 0.636, 95% CI 0.568-0.712; for CSS: HR 0.688, 95% CI 0.561–0.842, LCNEC as reference), while comparable for LSCC with LCNEC (for OS: HR 0.974, 95% CI 0.869–1.091; for CSS: HR 0.907, 95% CI 0.738–1.115). PSM generated 471 pairs when LCNEC was compared with LADC and both OS and CSS were significantly better in LADC than LCNEC (for OS: HR 0.580, 95% CI 0.491–0.686; for CSS: HR 0.602, 95% CI 0.446–0.814). Of note, for the subgroup of patients ≤ 65 years old, HRs for both OS and CSS were lower (for OS: HR 0.470; for CSS: HR 0.482). As for comparison between LCNEC and LSCC, PSM generated 470 pairs. Differently, only CSS was significantly superior in LSCC than LCNEC (HR 0.563, 95% CI 0.392–0.807), while OS was not. Further grouping by age showed only CSS between two groups for patients with age ≤ 65 years old was significantly different (P = 0.006).ConclusionsWe report the first survival comparison after surgery between stage IA LCNEC and other types of NSCLC by SEER database and PSM. Our results demonstrated after surgery, stage IA LCNEC was worse in survival, especially compared to LADC. Extra clinical care should be paid, especially for younger patients. More studies investigating adjuvant therapy are warranted.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaoxiu Hu ◽  
Yonghe Zhao ◽  
Yanlong Yang ◽  
Zhenghai Shen ◽  
Yunchao Huang

Abstract Objective: Recent studies indicated sputum miRNAs may provide a promising approach for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) diagnosis. But some results were still inconsistent. So, we performed meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic role of sputum miRNAs for the detection of NSCLC.Methods: Eligible studies that estimated the diagnostic accuracy of sputum miRNAs in NSCLC were searched in Pubmed, Embase and Web of Science and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI). Data from the eligible studies were collected and pooled; sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratios, weighted symmetric summary ROC curve and the area under the curve (AUC) were calculated by bi-variate random effects model. The between-study heterogeneity was evaluated by Q test and I2 statistics.Results: 30 studies from 16 articles were included for analysis. The overall analysis yielded the sensitivity of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.73–0.81) and specificity of 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83–0.90), with an area under the SROC curve (AUC) of 0.89 (95% CI: 0.86–0.91). Subgroup analysis revealed the diagnostic accuracy in multiple miRNAs studies was higher than single miRNA (the sensitivity, specifcity and an AUC of multiple miRNAs were 0.76, 0.88 and 0.90; and for single miRNA, it was 0.74, 0.74, and 0.80). The diagnostic performance in early stage NSCLC was also very high (the sensitivity, specifcity and an AUC of stage I/II was 0.76, 0.88 and 0.91; and for stage I, it was 0.79, 0.85, and 0.87). We also found miR-210, miR-21, miR-31 and miR-126-3p might serve as potential biomarkers for lung cancer.Conclusion: Sputum miRNAs was useful noninvasive biomarkers for NSCLC diagnosis.


2019 ◽  
Vol Volume 11 ◽  
pp. 6593-6602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xin Wang ◽  
Feifei Teng ◽  
Jie Lu ◽  
Dianbin Mu ◽  
Jianbo Zhang ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 254-262
Author(s):  
Rosa González-Quevedo ◽  
Pilar Iniesta ◽  
Alberto Morán ◽  
Carmen de Juan ◽  
Andrés Sánchez-Pernaute ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: Telomerase activity and p16 expression can be considered two of the most important molecular markers implicated in tumorigenesis. Our main aim was to study the cooperative role of both molecular alterations in the prognosis of patients surgically resected for non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We have determined telomerase activity and p16 expression in a series of 98 prospectively collected NSCLC specimens obtained from patients who had undergone surgery without other treatment. Telomerase activity was investigated by a telomeric repeat amplification protocol enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay–based procedure, and p16 expression was examined by Western blot. Associations with survival were evaluated. RESULTS: Positive results for telomerase activity were found in 82% of the cases, and this variable correlated with poor differentiation and recurrence of tumors. Lack of p16 expression was observed in 61% of tumors, and a significant association with tumor recurrence was also observed. By univariate analysis, both negative telomerase activity and p16-positive expression were significantly correlated with a better prognosis. Moreover, statistics for equality of survival distributions for telomerase, adjusted for p16, indicated a positive interaction between both parameters. For telomerase-positive tumors, p16 expression emerged as a significant independent protective variable, as indicated by Cox multivariate analysis (relative risk [RR], 0.214; P = .014). This protective effect was maintained only for stage I and II tumors (RR, 0.108; P = .046). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the combined telomerase activity and p16 expression analyses may be of prognostic importance in NSCLC, especially for patients affected by stage I and II tumors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document