Randomized clinical trial of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus radiofrequency ablation versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with intermediate stage (BCLC stage B) hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan criteria.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4077-4077
Author(s):  
Xin Yin ◽  
Bei Tang ◽  
Yu-Hong Gan ◽  
Yan-hong Wang ◽  
Yi Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Intermediate Stage ◽  
Milan Criteria ◽  
Tace Group ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

4077 Background: To determine treatment efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (hereafter, TACE+RFA) in patients with intermediate stage (BCLC stage B) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond Milan criteria. Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 110 patients with intermediate stage HCC beyond Milan criteria (single tumor with diameter 5-7cm, median; 3-5 multiple nodules with diameter less than 5cm) were included and randomly assigned to TACE+RFA group (n=55) and TACE group (n=55) at liver cancer institute, Zhongshan hospital. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) , time to progress (TTP) and best objective response (BOR). Results: The median OS in TACE+RFA and TACE group were 29 and 18 months, respectively. The median TTP and BOR were 15.7 months and 69.1 % in TACE+RFA group and 12.4 months and 40.0 % in TACE group (P=0.004). The 1-, 3-, and 4-year overall survivals for TACE+RFA group and TACE group were 97.2%, 67.9% and 59.4% versus 84.0%, 46.7% and 37.3% , respectively (P = 0.008). The corresponding PFS were 47.3%, 27.2% and 21.7% versus 35.6%,15.3% and 11.4% , respectively (P = 0.04).The incidences of major complications in TACE+RFA group were comparable to those in TACE group (P=0.14). Conclusions: TACE+RFA was superior to TACE in improving tumor response and overall survival for patients with intermediate stage (BCLC stage B) hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan criteria. Clinical trial information: NCT03636620.

A randomized phase II trial of a drug eluting bead in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4523-4523 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Lencioni ◽  
K. Malagari ◽  
T. Vogl ◽  
F. Pilleul ◽  
A. Denys ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Tumor Response ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Intermediate Stage ◽  
Curative Treatment ◽  
Tace Group ◽  
Conventional Tace ◽  
Drug Eluting ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

4523 Background: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been shown to offer a survival benefit for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A widely accepted TACE regimen includes the administration of a doxorubicin-in-oil emulsion followed by gelatine sponge particles. Recently, a drug-eluting bead (DEB) has been developed to enhance drug delivery to the tumor and reduce its systemic availability. Purpose of this randomized trial was to compare conventional TACE with DEB-TACE for the treatment of intermediate-stage HCC in patients with cirrhosis. Methods: Two hundred and twelve patients (185 males and 27 females; mean age, 67 years) with Child-Pugh A or B liver cirrhosis and large and/or multinodular, unresectable HCC were randomized to receive DEB-TACE (DC Bead; Biocompatibles, UK) uploaded with doxorubicin or conventional TACE with doxorubicin, lipiodol, and gelatin sponge particles. Randomization was stratified according to Child Pugh status (A or B), performance status (ECOG 0 or 1), bilobar disease (yes or no) and prior curative treatment (yes or no). Tumor response at 6 months was the primary study endpoint. An independent, blinded review of magnetic resonance imaging studies was conducted to assess tumor response according to amended RECIST criteria. Results: DEB-TACE with doxorubicin showed a higher rate of complete response, objective response and disease control compared with conventional TACE (27% vs 22%; 52% vs 44%; and 63% vs 52%, respectively; p>0.05). Patients with Child Pugh B, ECOG 1, bilobar disease and recurrence following curative treatment showed a significant increase in objective response (p=0.038) compared to the control. There was a marked reduction in serious liver toxicity in patients treated with DEB-TACE. The rate of doxorubicin related side effects was significantly lower (p=0.0001) in the DEB-TACE group compared with the conventional TACE group. Conclusions: DEB-TACE with doxorubicin is safe and effective in the treatment of intermediate-stage HCC and may offer benefit to patients with more advanced disease. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Evaluation of doxorubicin-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with endovascular brachytherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma with main portal vein tumor thrombus

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyuan Wu ◽  
Ju Gong ◽  
Wei Huang ◽  
Qingbing Wang ◽  
Ziyin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Portal Vein ◽  
Tumor Thrombus ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Main Portal Vein ◽  
Tace Group ◽  
Iodine 125 ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

Abstract Background The goal of this study was to compare the clinical results of conventional transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (C-TACE) and doxorubicin-eluting bead transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (D-TACE) combined with endovascular stent implantation with an iodine-125 seed strand in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with main portal vein tumor thrombus (MPVTT).Methods This study was a prospective controlled study with follow-up dates spanning from Mar 2015 to Feb 2020. Patients with both HCC and MPVTT were randomly divided into two groups. Portal vein stents with iodine-125 seed strands were implanted first; then, C-TACE or D-TACE was administered to all patients. Objective response rates were assessed. The time to disease progression and survival rate were compared between the two groups.Results A total of 26 patients were enrolled, with 13 in each group. During follow-up, the portal stent patency times were 112.3±98.2 days in the C-TACE group and 101.7±90.4 days in the D-TACE group. The time to disease progression was 42 days in the C-TACE group and 120 days in the D-TACE group (p=0.03). The overall survival time from the first intervention procedure was 216 days in the C-TACE group and 239 days in the D-TACE group (p=0.047). The D-TACE group was superior to the C-TACE group in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times.Conclusion Endovascular implantation of a stent with an iodine-125 seed strand combined with TACE is safe and effective in HCC patients with MPVTT. Compared to C-TACE, D-TACE achieves more benefits regarding PFS and OS.Trial registration This study was a cohort study, no health-related interventions to evaluate the effects on health outcomes. This study wasn’t a clinical trial.

scholarly journals Individual or combined transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a time-to-event meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuang Jiang ◽  
Gong Cheng ◽  
Mingheng Liao ◽  
Jiwei Huang
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Similar Rate ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

Abstract Background There is still some debate as to whether transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is better than TACE or RFA alone. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of TACE plus RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with RFA or TACE alone. Methods We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) for all relevant randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies reporting overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and complications of TACE plus RFA for HCC, compared with RFA or TACE alone. Results Twenty-one studies involving 3413 patients were included. TACE combined with RFA was associated with better OS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.62, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.55–0.71, P < 0.001) and RFS (HR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.39–0.69, P < 0.001) than TACE alone; compared with RFA alone, TACE plus RFA resulted in longer OS (HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.53–0.75, P < 0.001) and RFS (HR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.51–0.71, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses by tumor size also showed that combined treatment resulted in better OS and RFS compared with RFA alone in patients with HCC larger than 3 cm. Combined treatment resulted in similar rate of major complications compared with TACE or RFA alone (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 0.99–3.20, P = 0.05; OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.42–2.38, P = 1.00, respectively). Conclusions TACE combined with RFA was more effective for HCC than TACE alone. For patients with a tumor larger than 3 cm, the combined treatment also achieved a better effect than RFA alone.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document