scholarly journals Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Therapy Versus Surgical Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma within the Milan Criteria: A Meta-Analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-dong Wang ◽  
Li-hua Zhang ◽  
Jia-Yan Ni ◽  
Xiong-ying Jiang ◽  
Dong Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Milan Criteria ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

scholarly journals Individual or combined transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a time-to-event meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chuang Jiang ◽  
Gong Cheng ◽  
Mingheng Liao ◽  
Jiwei Huang
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Similar Rate ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
China National Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Knowledge Infrastructure ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

Abstract Background There is still some debate as to whether transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is better than TACE or RFA alone. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of TACE plus RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with RFA or TACE alone. Methods We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) for all relevant randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies reporting overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and complications of TACE plus RFA for HCC, compared with RFA or TACE alone. Results Twenty-one studies involving 3413 patients were included. TACE combined with RFA was associated with better OS (hazard ratio [HR]=0.62, 95% confidence intervals [CI] = 0.55–0.71, P < 0.001) and RFS (HR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.39–0.69, P < 0.001) than TACE alone; compared with RFA alone, TACE plus RFA resulted in longer OS (HR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.53–0.75, P < 0.001) and RFS (HR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.51–0.71, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses by tumor size also showed that combined treatment resulted in better OS and RFS compared with RFA alone in patients with HCC larger than 3 cm. Combined treatment resulted in similar rate of major complications compared with TACE or RFA alone (OR = 1.78, 95% CI = 0.99–3.20, P = 0.05; OR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.42–2.38, P = 1.00, respectively). Conclusions TACE combined with RFA was more effective for HCC than TACE alone. For patients with a tumor larger than 3 cm, the combined treatment also achieved a better effect than RFA alone.

Randomized clinical trial of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus radiofrequency ablation versus transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with intermediate stage (BCLC stage B) hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan criteria.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4077-4077
Author(s):  
Xin Yin ◽  
Bei Tang ◽  
Yu-Hong Gan ◽  
Yan-hong Wang ◽  
Yi Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Intermediate Stage ◽  
Milan Criteria ◽  
Tace Group ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

4077 Background: To determine treatment efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (hereafter, TACE+RFA) in patients with intermediate stage (BCLC stage B) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) beyond Milan criteria. Methods: In this randomized clinical trial, 110 patients with intermediate stage HCC beyond Milan criteria (single tumor with diameter 5-7cm, median; 3-5 multiple nodules with diameter less than 5cm) were included and randomly assigned to TACE+RFA group (n=55) and TACE group (n=55) at liver cancer institute, Zhongshan hospital. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) , time to progress (TTP) and best objective response (BOR). Results: The median OS in TACE+RFA and TACE group were 29 and 18 months, respectively. The median TTP and BOR were 15.7 months and 69.1 % in TACE+RFA group and 12.4 months and 40.0 % in TACE group (P=0.004). The 1-, 3-, and 4-year overall survivals for TACE+RFA group and TACE group were 97.2%, 67.9% and 59.4% versus 84.0%, 46.7% and 37.3% , respectively (P = 0.008). The corresponding PFS were 47.3%, 27.2% and 21.7% versus 35.6%,15.3% and 11.4% , respectively (P = 0.04).The incidences of major complications in TACE+RFA group were comparable to those in TACE group (P=0.14). Conclusions: TACE+RFA was superior to TACE in improving tumor response and overall survival for patients with intermediate stage (BCLC stage B) hepatocellular carcinoma beyond Milan criteria. Clinical trial information: NCT03636620.

scholarly journals Comparison of Radiofrequency Ablation with or without Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinxin Wang ◽  
Yang Che ◽  
Shiyong Chen ◽  
Biao Wu ◽  
Yu He ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Arterial Chemoembolization

Abstract Background To evaluate the curative effect and safety of compare radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with or without transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)with the help of a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) . Materials and Methods RCTs comparing TACE combined with RFA and RFA alone were searched electronically using PubMed, The Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. Fixed and random-effects were used to measure pooled estimates. Research indicators included overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFA), tumor progression and complications. Results Overall, 6 RCTs were included in this meta-analysis, with a total of 527 patients (TACE-RFA: 271; RFA: 256). 3- and5-year OS rate was higher in the TACE-RFA group than in the RFA group (OR = 1.74; 95% CI: 1.17–2.59; p = 0.006; OR = 2.19; 95% CI: 1.49–3.22; p < 0.0001). The 3- and 5-year RFS rate in the TACE-RFA group was higher than that in the RFA group (OR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.30 ~ 2.82, p = 0.0009; OR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.21 ~ 2.70, p = 0.004, respectively). The rate of tumor progression was lower in the TACE-RFA group than in the RFA group (OR = 0.57; 95% CI: 0.38 ~ 0.85; p = 0.005). No significant differences in terms of 1-year OS rate and complications rate were observed between groups.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document