Gastrostomy tube for nutrition and bowel obstruction in patients with advanced malignancy: Less is more.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 700-700
Author(s):  
Gabrielle Gauvin ◽  
Chi Chi Do-Nguyen ◽  
Leigh T Selesner ◽  
Eileen O'Halloran ◽  
Johanna Lou ◽  
...  

700 Background: Malnutrition and malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) are common consequences of advanced malignancy. Both lead to a poor prognosis, frequent hospitalizations, and have a negative impact on quality of life. The aim of this study is to explore gastrostomy tube (g-tube) placement practices to better define the role of g-tube role in advanced malignancy. Methods: Patients who underwent g-tube placement at our tertiary cancer care center between 2013 and 2017 were included in this study. Patients’ demographics, diagnosis, procedures, postoperative course, and clinical data were collected. Complications and survival were used as endpoints. Results: Two hundred forty-two cancer patients with an average age at diagnosis of 61 years (range 21-94) underwent g-tube placement for nutrition (76.4%), decompression (MBO) (22.7%), or both (0.8%). Active treatment within 3 months of g-tube insertion was seen in 37.8% of the nutrition group versus 29.1% in the MBO group (p = 0.208). Successful insertion was achieved in 96.8% of patients, but nine patients required more than one method of insertion attempt. In the nutrition group, successful method of insertion was 88.1% in interventional radiology, 8.1% in operating room, and 3.8% in endoscopy suite, compared to 81.8%, 14.5%, and 3.6% for the MBO group, respectively (p = 0.426). Post-placement complications were significantly less common in the MBO group compared to the nutrition group (24.1 vs. 54.3%, p < 0.001). Consultation pattern in the MBO group revealed that 45.5% had a palliative care consult, 56.4% were seen by social work, and 47.3% went to hospice. Survival in the MBO group was significantly shorter than in the nutrition group at 30 days (52.7 vs. 90.3%, p < 0.001), 1-year (54.6 vs. 5.9%, p<0.001), and three years (24.1 vs 1.8%, p = 0.001) after g-tube placement. Conclusions: In our experience, most patients who undergo g-tube insertion are not receiving active treatment and a large proportion of patients who receive a decompressive g-tube have a life expectancy of less than a month. These findings will inform the next step of our study: creating a discussion tool to coordinate better care and interventional decision making for patients with advanced malignancy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 225 (4) ◽  
pp. S77-S78
Author(s):  
Marguerite Changala ◽  
Elizabeth J. Lilley ◽  
Angela M. Bader ◽  
Richard D. Urman ◽  
Nicholas Sadovnikoff ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Mizuki Ozawa ◽  
Miyuki Sone ◽  
Yasuaki Arai ◽  
Shunsuke Sugawara ◽  
Chihiro Itou ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose The aim of the study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the trans-colostomy placement of a button gastrostomy tube for patients with malignant bowel obstruction due to peritoneal carcinomatosis. Material and Methods Data from seven consecutive patients who presented with malignant bowel obstruction due to peritoneal carcinomatosis involving the colostomy site and underwent trans-colostomy button gastrostomy tube placement between 2013 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. We assessed technical and clinical success rate, procedure time, duration of improvement, and complication rate. Results The technical success rate of the trans-colostomy button gastrostomy tube placement was 100%, and average procedure time was 25 minutes. Clinical symptoms of malignant bowel obstruction resolved in four out of seven (57%) patients. Average duration of improvement in the four patients with clinical success was 170.8 days. There were no complications associated with the procedure. Conclusion Trans-colostomy button gastrostomy tube placement might be a safe and feasible treatment option for patients with malignant bowel obstruction due to peritoneal carcinomatosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 480-486
Author(s):  
Kevin M. Beers ◽  
Aaron Bettenhausen ◽  
Thomas J. Prihoda ◽  
John H. Calhoon ◽  
S. Adil Husain

Background: Neonates undergoing congenital heart defect repair require optimized nutritional support in the perioperative period. Utilization of a gastrostomy tube is not infrequent, yet optimal timing for placement is ill-defined. The objective of this study was to identify characteristics of patients whose postoperative course included gastrostomy tube placement to facilitate supplemental tube feeding following neonatal repair of congenital heart defects. Methods: A single-institution, retrospective chart review identified 64 consecutive neonates who underwent cardiac operations from 2012 to 2016. Perioperative variables were evaluated for significance in relation to gastrostomy tube placement. Results: A total of 27 (42%) underwent gastrostomy tube placement. Diagnosis of a genetic syndrome was associated with the likelihood of placement of gastrostomy tube ( P = .032), as were patients with single ventricle physiology ( P = .0013) compared to those felt to be amenable to eventual biventricular repair. Aortic arch reconstruction ( P = .029), as well as the need for delayed sternal closure ( P = .05), was associated with increased frequency of gastrostomy tube placement. Postoperative outcomes including the number of days intubated ( P = .0026) and the presence of significant dysphagia ( P = .0034) were associated with gastrostomy placement. Additionally, genetic syndrome ( P = .003), aortic arch reconstruction ( P = .01), and postoperative intubation duration ( P = .0024) correlated with increased length of stay, where increased length of stay was associated with gastrostomy tube placement ( P = .0004). Discussion: Patient characteristics that were associated with a high likelihood of eventual gastrostomy placement were identified in this study. Early recognition of such characteristics in future patients may allow for reduced time to gastrostomy tube placement, which in turn may improve perioperative growth and outcomes.


2021 ◽  
pp. 000348942098742
Author(s):  
David W. Wassef ◽  
Nehal Dhaduk ◽  
Savannah C. Roy ◽  
Gregory L. Barinsky ◽  
Evelyne Kalyoussef

Objectives: Tympanostomy tubes can prevent sequelae of otitis media that adversely affect long term hearing and language development in children. These negative outcomes compound the existing difficulties faced by children who are already diagnosed with developmental disorders. This study aims to characterize this subset of children with developmental disorders undergoing myringotomy and tympanostomy tube insertion. Methods: A retrospective review using the Kids’ Inpatient Database (KID) was conducted, with codes from International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision used to query data from the years 2003 to 2012 to determine a study group of children with a diagnosis of a developmental disorder undergoing myringotomy and tympanostomy insertion. This group was compared statistically to patients undergoing these procedures who did not have a diagnosed developmental disorder. Results: In total, 21 945 cases of patients with myringotomy with or without tympanostomy tube insertion were identified, of which 1200 (5.5%) had a diagnosis of a developmental disorder. Children with developmental disorders had a higher mean age (3.3 years vs 2.9 years, P = .002) and higher mean hospital charges ($43 704.77 vs $32 764.22, P = .003). This cohort also had higher proportions of black (17.6% vs 12.3%, P < .001) and Hispanic (23.9% vs 20.6%, P = .014) patients, and had lower rates of private insurance coverage (39.6% vs 49%, P < .001). Conclusion: The population of children with developmental disorders undergoing myringotomy or tympanostomy tube placement has a different demographic composition than the general population and faces distinct financial and insurance coverage burdens. Further study should be done to assess if these differences impact long term outcomes.


2000 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. AB217
Author(s):  
Sean R. Lacey ◽  
Elizabeth O'Toole ◽  
Richard C. Wong ◽  
Gregory S. Cooper ◽  
Stuart Youngner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document