Network-meta-analysis of chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (MAC-NPC): An update on 8,221 patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6523-6523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Petit ◽  
Anne WM Lee ◽  
Alexandra Carmel ◽  
Wai Tong Ng ◽  
Jun Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Collaborative Group ◽  
Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Network Heterogeneity ◽  
Fixed And Random Effects

6523 Background: Based on an individual patient data (IPD) network meta-analysis (NMA) of 20 randomized trials and 5,144 patients (pts), the MAC-NPC collaborative group has shown that the addition of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) to chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) achieved the highest survival benefit in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC; Ribassin-Majed JCO 2017). Here, we updated the meta-analysis with the addition of 8 trials. Methods: Trials of Radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy (CT) in patients with non-metastatic NPC were identified and updated IPD obtained. Both Western and Chinese medical literatures were searched. Overall Survival (OS) was the main endpoint. Fixed and random-effects frequentist NMA models were applied, network heterogeneity and consistency were evaluated. P-score was used to rank the treatments. R software - netmeta package was used to perform the analyses. Treatments were grouped in the following categories: RT alone (RT), induction chemotherapy followed by RT (IC-RT), induction chemotherapy without taxanes followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy (ICtax(-)-CRT), induction chemotherapy with taxanes followed by concomitant chemoradiotherapy (ICtax(+)-CRT), concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), concomitant chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (CRT-AC) and RT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (RT-AC). Results: Overall 28 trials and 8,214 pts were included. Median follow-up was 7.2 years. There was no heterogeneity in the NMA. There was inconsistency in the main analysis, which disappeared after the exclusion of 2 outlier trials. ICtax(+)-CRT ranked the best treatment for OS with a P-Score of 91%. Hazard ratio [HR, 95% Confidence Interval] for ICtax(+)-CRT was 0.75 [0.59-0.96] compared to CRT and 0.92 [0.69-1.24] compared to CRT-AC (second best treatment in raking with a P-Score of 85%; see league table below). When the 2 types of IC were merged, CRT-AC ranked the first followed by IC-CRT with P-Scores of 93% and 86% respectively, with a HR of 0.97 [0.84-1.14] for CRT-AC vs. IC-CRT. Conclusions: This IPD NMA of the treatment of locally advanced NPC demonstrates that the addition of IC or AC to CRT improves disease control probability and survival over CRT alone. Data on progression-free survival, locoregional and distant control will be presented at the meeting. [Table: see text]

Safety and efficacy of docetaxel combined with cisplatin as induction chemotherapy followed by cisplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy plus gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A prospective and multicenter phase II trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6064-6064
Author(s):  
Zhi Hui Wang ◽  
Peijian Peng ◽  
Siyang Wang ◽  
Yumeng Liu ◽  
Zhong Lin
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Treatment Strategy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

6064 Background: Radiation therapy is the only curative treatment modality for nonmetastatic nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC). Concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) is the standard treatment strategy for NPC in locally advanced stages. However, the results after such treatment are suboptimal. Clearly, novel treatment strategies are needed to further improve patients’ survival rates. This trial aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of a new treatment strategy. Methods: Patients with stage III – IVa-b NPC received TP (docetaxel 75 mg/m2, cisplatin 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks for 2-3 cycles) followed by cisplatin chemotherapy concurrently with either 3-dimentional conformal radiation therapy or intensity-modulated radiation therapy plus gemcitabine (1000mg/m2 every 2 weeks for 2 cycles) as adjuvant chemotherapy. Objective response rates and acute toxicity were assessed based on RECIST (1.1) and CTCAE v.4.0, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate survival rates. This trial is registered with the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry, number ChiCTR-OIC-17011464. Results: From July 2010 to July 2017, 20 eligible patients with nonmetastatic stage III-IVb NPC were enrolled. The objective response rates were 90% (3 complete responses [CRs] and 15 partial responses [PRs]) after two or three cycles of induction chemotherapy (ICT) and 100% (17 CRs and three PRs) after CCRT plus gemcitabine adjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. With a median follow-up time of 41 months, the 3-year overall survival rates were 90% (18/20,95% confidence interval [CI], 76.9%-100%).The 3-year progression-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and local progression-free survival rates were 80% (16/20,95% CI, 62.5%-97.5%), 85% (17/20,95% CI, 69.4%-100%),95% (19/20,95% CI, 85,4%-100%), respectively. The most frequent grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (3/20,15%) and nausea (2/20,10%) after ICT and thrombocytopenia (6/20,30%) and leukopenia (6/20,30%) after CCRT plus gemcitabine adjuvant chemotherapy. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant TP followed by concurrent chemoradiation plus gemcitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy was well tolerated and produced promising outcomes in patients with LA-NPC in this hypothesis-generating study. The authors concluded that randomized controlled trials are warranted to definitively confirm this aggressive and potentially efficacious strategy. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR-OIC-17011464.

scholarly journals Effect of Induction Chemotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: An Updated Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shan-Shan Yang ◽  
Jian-Gui Guo ◽  
Jia-Ni Liu ◽  
Zhi-Qiao Liu ◽  
En-Ni Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Pooled Analysis ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Long Term Result ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundPrevious meta-analysis had evaluated the effect of induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. But two trials with opposite findings were not included and the long-term result of another trial significantly differed from the preliminary report. This updated meta-analysis was thus warranted.MethodsLiterature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials focusing on the additional efficacy of induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Trial-level pooled analysis of hazard ratio (HR) for progression free survival and overall survival and risk ratio (RR) for locoregional control rate and distant control rate were performed.ResultsTwelve trials were eligible. The addition of induction chemotherapy significantly prolonged both progression free survival (HR=0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60–0.76, p<0.001) and overall survival (HR=0.67, 95% CI 0.54–0.80, p<0.001), with 5-year absolute benefit of 11.31% and 8.95%, respectively. Locoregional (RR=0.80, 95% CI 0.70–0.92, p=0.002) and distant control (RR=0.70, 95% CI 0.62–0.80) rates were significantly improved as well. The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events during the concurrent chemoradiotherapy was higher in leukopenia (p=0.028), thrombocytopenia (p<0.001), and fatigue (p=0.038) in the induction chemotherapy group.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis supported that induction chemotherapy could benefit patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in progression free survival, overall survival, locoregional, and distant control rate.

Induction chemotherapy plus concomitant chemoradiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An updated network meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 160 ◽  
pp. 103244
Author(s):  
Alberto Bongiovanni ◽  
Alessandro Vagheggini ◽  
Valentina Fausti ◽  
Laura Mercatali ◽  
Sebastiano Calpona ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Concomitant Chemoradiotherapy

scholarly journals The Most Efficacious Induction Chemotherapy Regimen for Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Horace Cheuk-Wai Choi ◽  
Sik-Kwan Chan ◽  
Ka-On Lam ◽  
Sum-Yin Chan ◽  
Sze-Chun Chau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Analysis Models

BackgroundInduction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for non-metastatic locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has gained considerable attention. However, the most efficacious IC regimens remain investigational. We aimed to compare the survival benefits of all available IC regimens followed by CCRT in this network meta-analysis.MethodsAll randomized-controlled trials of CCRT with or without IC in non-metastatic locoregionally advanced NPC were included, with an overall nine trials of 2,705 patients counted in the analysis. CCRT alone was the reference category. Eight IC regimens followed by CCRT were analyzed: docetaxel + cisplatin (DC), gemcitabine + carboplatin + paclitaxel (GCP), gemcitabine + cisplatin (GP), mitomycin + epirubicin + cisplatin + fluorouracil + leucovorin (MEPFL), cisplatin + epirubicin + paclitaxel (PET), cisplatin + fluorouracil (PF), cisplatin + capecitabine (PX) and cisplatin + fluorouracil (PF), cisplatin + capecitabine (PX). Fixed-effects frequentist network meta-analysis models was applied and P-score was used to rank the treatments.ResultsDC, GP, and PX were the top three IC regimens with the highest probability of benefit on overall survival (OS). Their corresponding hazard ratios (HRs) (95% CIs) compared with CCRT alone were of 0.24 (0.08–0.73), 0.43 (0.24–0.77), and 0.54 (0.27–1.09) and the respective P-scores were 94%, 82%, and 68%. The first three IC regimens showing significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) were PX, followed by GP and DC with respective HRs of 0.46 (0.24–0.88), 0.51 (0.34–0.77), and 0.49 (0.20–1.20), and P-scores of 82%, 78%, and 74%. Among the studies in the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) era, GP and PX were the best performed IC regimens, whilst DC performed the best among non-IMRT studies. Doublet and gemcitabine-based IC regimens had better survival benefits compared to triplet and taxane-based IC regimens, respectively.ConclusionsGiven its consistent superiority in both OS and PFS, DC, GP, and PX ranked among the three most efficacious IC regimens in both the overall and subgroup analysis of IMRT or non-IMRT studies. Exploratory analyses suggested that doublet and gemcitabine-based IC regimens showed better survival performance.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document