The spinal distribution of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Support for locoregional rather than arterial hematogenous mode of early bony dissemination.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 742-742
Author(s):  
Kyrollis Attalla ◽  
Cihan Duzgol ◽  
Lily McLaughlin ◽  
Jessica Flynn ◽  
Irina Ostrovnaya ◽  
...  

742 Background: To investigate the distribution of spinal metastasis in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and to explore relationships between biological and clinical factors and patterns of spinal spread. Methods: An institutional database was queried to identify patients with mRCC and spinal metastatic involvement from June 2005 – November 2018. A blinded radiologist examined all cross-sectional imaging involving the spine and scored each level for absence or presence of disease. Clinical and biologic features including primary tumor size and degree of spinal and non-bony metastatic involvement (including regional lymph node and distant deposits) were collected. Spinal distributions were evaluated by the Kolmogorov Smirnov test and compared across radiographic and clinical parameters. Results: One-hundred patients with 685 spinal levels involved by mRCC were evaluated. A nonuniform spatial distribution was observed across the cohort; a preponderance of thoracolumbar involvement was noted with the mode at L3 (p<0.001). No difference in metastatic distribution was observed in right versus left-sided tumors. Tumors <4cm compared to >7cm, patients who had distant spread versus bone-only disease, and patients with increasing number of spine levels involved (1 versus >5 levels) had a significantly different distribution (p<0.001 for all comparisons). Smaller tumor size, distant spread, and greater number of involved levels appeared to have a more uniform distribution of spinal metastasis. Conclusions: These data support a dominant locoregional as opposed to arterial hematogenous mechanism for the early dissemination of mRCC to the spine. This is concordant with the theory of the valveless Batson plexus acting as a conduit for such spread, as the kidneys are compartmentally distinct from, but reside just anterior to the spine at L1-L3. Characterizations of the biologic molecular features contributing to osseous tropism and aggressive tumor biology (as seen in the subset of patients with uniform spread, such as outlier patients with small tumors), have implications for surveillance and are an area of active investigation.

2021 ◽  
pp. OP.21.00419
Author(s):  
Jennifer Tran ◽  
Moshe C. Ornstein

Renal cell carcinomas vary considerably in their tumor biology and disease course, which is reflected in the range of treatment paradigms in localized and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Active surveillance remains an important component of all renal cell carcinoma management. In mRCC, the rapid evolution from cytokine-based therapy to targeted therapy to immunotherapy with checkpoint blockade has revolutionized the field and drastically altered treatment outcomes. More recently, combination therapies have become a standard of care for most patients with mRCC. In this review, we highlight recent critical data that led to changes in treatment paradigms and provide a practical framework for the management of patients with mRCC.


2009 ◽  
Vol 182 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Houston Thompson ◽  
Jennifer R. Hill ◽  
Yuriy Babayev ◽  
Angel Cronin ◽  
Matt Kaag ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 181 (4S) ◽  
pp. 212-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Houston Thompson ◽  
Jennifer R Hill ◽  
Yuriy Babayev ◽  
Angel M Cronin ◽  
Matt Kaag ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Han Kim ◽  
Sohee Kim ◽  
Byung-Ho Nam ◽  
Sang Eun Lee ◽  
Choung-Soo Kim ◽  
...  

We aimed to identify prognostic factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients treated with sorafenib. We investigated 177 patients, including 116 who received sorafenib as first-line therapy, using the Cox regression model. During a median follow-up period of 19.2 months, the PFS and OS were 6.4 and 32.6 months among all patients and 7.4 months and undetermined for first-line sorafenib-treated patients, respectively. Clinical T3-4 stage (hazard ratio [HR] 2.56) and a primary tumor size >7 cm (HR 0.34) were significant prognostic factors for PFS among all patients, as were tumor size >7 cm (HR 0.12), collecting system invasion (HR 5.67), and tumor necrosis (HR 4.11) for OS (p<0.05). In first-line sorafenib-treated patients, ≥4 metastatic lesions (HR 28.57), clinical T3-4 stage (HR 4.34), collecting system invasion (univariate analysis HR 2.11; multivariate analysis HR 0.07), lymphovascular invasion (HR 13.35), and tumor necrosis (HR 6.69) were significant prognosticators of PFS, as were bone metastasis (HR 5.49) and clinical T3-4 stages (HR 4.1) for OS (p<0.05). Our study thus identified a number of primary tumor-related characteristics as important prognostic factors in sorafenib-treated mRCC patients.


2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 364-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Surena F. Matin ◽  
Christopher G. Wood ◽  
Shi-Ming Tu ◽  
Nizar M. Tannir ◽  
Eric Jonasch

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document