Advance care planning in metastatic cancer patients: A quality improvement initiative.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 22-22
Author(s):  
Steven Oppenheim ◽  
Robert A. Figlin ◽  
Edward G. Seferian ◽  
Kevin S. Scher ◽  
Margaret R Reed ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Tumor Boards ◽  
Main Driver ◽  
Icd 10 ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Improve Access

22 Background: The initiative aimed to increase the rate of advance care planning (ACP) activities for outpatients with metastatic cancer. Methods: The project was sponsored by the institution’s Quality Committee in collaboration with the Cancer Quality Committee, Oncology Division, Tumor Boards, and Medical Group. Metastatic cancer patients were identified by ICD-10 coding and later by oncologist electronic health record (EHR) documentation of metastatic status. ACP activities were defined as either an ACP note, Advance Directive, Physician’s Order for Life Sustaining Therapy, or a palliative medicine (PM) consultation. The EHR was revised to include a section for ACP documentation. Quarterly reports were sent to oncologists with data comparing their rate of ACP activities for patients with metastatic cancer with peers. Oncologists’ identities were initially blinded and later unblinded. Oncologists received a monthly list of their metastatic patients without any ACP activities. Results: The study covered 5201 unique cancer patients cared for by 60 oncologists each year. The rate of ACP activities for metastatic cancer patients increased from 37% in 2017 to 57% at the end of 2020. Data on individual ACP activities are pending analysis. The ACP activities were driven most by PM consultations, which rose from 12% to 39%. Conclusions: This initiative successfully increased ACP activities for patients with metastatic cancer. ACP activities are an essential step to achieve goal concordant care. Given that the main driver of increased ACP activities was PM referrals, further work will be required to strengthen oncologist’s ACP skills and improve access to PM.

Use of a computer model and care coaches to increase advance care planning conversations for patients with metastatic cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8-8
Author(s):  
Divya Gupta ◽  
Touran Fardeen ◽  
Winifred Teuteberg ◽  
Briththa Seevaratnam ◽  
Mary Khay Asuncion ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Computer Model ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Life Quality ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Survival Prognosis ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Lay Care

8 Background: Patients with metastatic cancer benefit from advance care planning (ACP) conversations. Despite initiatives which train providers to have ACP conversations using the serious illness care program (SICP) conversation guide, few patients have a documented prognosis discussion due to busy clinic schedules and difficulty in deciding the right times to have such conversations. We designed an intervention to improve ACP by incorporating a validated computer model to identify patients at high risk for mortality in combination with lay care coaches. We investigated whether this would improve end of life quality measures. Methods: Four Stanford clinics were included in this pilot; all received SICP training. Two clinics (thoracic and genitourinary) underwent the intervention (computer model + care coach), and two clinics (sarcoma and cutaneous) served as the control. For providers in the intervention, an email was sent every Sunday listing the metastatic cancer patients who would be seen in clinic the following week and a predicted prognosis generated by the model. A lay care coach contacted patients with a predicted survival ≤2 years to have an ACP conversation with them. After, the care coach notified the provider to suggest discussion regarding prognosis with the patient. Criteria for a patient visit to be included in the analysis were: age ≥18, established patient, has sufficient EMR data for computer model, and no prior prognosis documentation. The primary outcome was documentation of prognosis in the ACP form by the end of the week following the clinic visit. Results: 5330 visits in 1298 unique patients met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 67 (range 19-97); 790 male, 508 female. 1970 visits were with patients with ≤2 year predicted survival. Prognosis discussion was documented by providers in the ACP form for 8.1% of intervention visits compared to 0.07% of control visits (p=0.001 in mixed effects model). Of the 1298 unique patients, 84 were deceased by December 2020. 41.7% died in the hospital. 59.5% were enrolled in hospice prior to death, and 19.0% were hospitalized in the ICU ≤14 days prior to death. Of deceased patients with ACP form prognosis documentation, 5.0% had ≥2 hospitalizations in the 30 days before death compared to 23.4% of deceased patients with no prognosis documented (p=0.10). For ≥ 2 ER visits in the 30 days before death, the proportions were 5.0% and 20.3% (p=0.17). Conclusions: This pilot study supports that our intervention is associated with higher rates of prognosis discussions and documentation. There was a trend towards better quality of end of life care as noted by higher rates of hospice enrollment and less intensive care at end of life. These results merit further investigation as a means to improve goal-concordant care and ensure appropriate care for cancer patients at the end of life.

Using a values assessment as a bridge to advance care planning: Results of 1286 patient reports.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12-12
Author(s):  
John Russell Hoverman ◽  
Cynthia Taniguchi ◽  
Kathryn J Eagye ◽  
Susan Ash-Lee ◽  
Angela Kalisiak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Patient Reports ◽  
Values Assessment ◽  
Advance Care

12 Background: Recent studies have shown that formal Palliative Care (PC) improves care at the end of life for cancer patients. The role of communication in PC is not defined. Other studies have shown that communication alone can be associated with better end of life outcomes. The US Oncology Network developed and tested a Values Assessment (VA) instrument for routinely broaching difficult topics to facilitate more formal advance care planning (ACP). The results of the first 28 months of the program on over 1200 patients are reported here. Methods: The VA consists of 10 questions of the format “How valuable is it to me to….”, for example “know that I am not a burden to my family, friends or helpers?” Responses were on a 4 point scale from unsure to very valuable. The VA was completed either in person in the clinic or telephonically. VA participation by n = 1286 metastatic cancer patients treated at participating practices from 4/1/2013-7/31/2015 were extracted from the EHR and confirmed by chart review, as were demographic (age, gender, ethnicity), clinical (diagnosis and stage), chemotherapy treatment and outcomes (hospice enrollment and place of death). Demographics and outcomes were compared using the Chi-Squared or Fisher’s Exact Test, or Wilcoxon Rank Sums test for continuous variables. Results: 1268 patients completed the VA. 56.7% were 65 or over. 57.8% went on to complete Advance Directives (AD). 52% had colon or lung cancer. There were 438 deaths of which 431 had a date of last chemotherapy recorded. Of these 431 patients, 78% died at home or inpatient hospice, 14.6% in the hospital. Hospice enrollment with AD was 76.1%, without 60.9%. (p = .008) Median LOS in hospice was 21 days vs. 12.5 (p = .025). Chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life was 7.05% with AD, 13.4% without. The VA was well accepted by patients. Conclusions: A VA as a routine part of practice is feasible and scalable. It can be delivered successfully either face to face or telephonically. It facilitates ACP discussion leading to AD. The results suggest VA and ACP lead to less aggressive care at the end of life.

Outpatient Advance Care Planning for Patients with Metastatic Cancer: A Pilot Quality Improvement Initiative

2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 1231-1237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Obel ◽  
Bruce Brockstein ◽  
Michael Marschke ◽  
Ari Robicsek ◽  
Chad Konchak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Metastatic Cancer ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Advance Care

scholarly journals The Role of Advance Care Planning in Cancer Patient and Caregiver Grief Resolution: Helpful or Harmful?

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1977
Author(s):  
Francesca Falzarano ◽  
Holly G. Prigerson ◽  
Paul K. Maciejewski
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Do Not Resuscitate ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal Study ◽  
Advance Care ◽  
Grief Resolution ◽  
Caregiver Grief ◽  
Prospective Longitudinal

Cancer patients and their family caregivers experience various losses when patients become terminally ill, yet little is known about the grief experienced by patients and caregivers and factors that influence grief as patients approach death. Additionally, few, if any, studies have explored associations between advance care planning (ACP) and grief resolution among cancer patients and caregivers. To fill this knowledge gap, the current study examined changes in grief over time in patients and their family caregivers and whether changes in patient grief are associated with changes in caregiver grief. We also sought to determine how grief changed following the completion of advance directives. The sample included advanced cancer patients and caregivers (n = 98 dyads) from Coping with Cancer III, a federally funded, multi-site prospective longitudinal study of end-stage cancer care. Participants were interviewed at baseline and at follow-up roughly 2 months later. Results suggest synchrony, whereby changes in patient grief were associated with changes in caregiver grief. We also found that patients who completed a living will (LW) experienced increases in grief, while caregivers of patients who completed a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order experienced reductions in grief, suggesting that ACP may prompt “grief work” in patients while promoting grief resolution in caregivers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document