The State of the Do-Not-Resuscitate Order in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in the Middle East: A Retrospective Study

Objectives The Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) order is part of most hospitals’ policies on the process of making and communicating decisions about a patient's resuscitation status. Yet it has not become a part of our society's ritual of dying in the Middle East especially among children. Given the diversity of pediatric patients, the DNR order continues to represent a challenge to all parties involved in the care of children including the medical team and the family. Methods This was a retrospective review of the medical charts of patients who had died in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a tertiary academic institution in Beirut, Lebanon within the period of January 2012 and December 2017. Results Eighty-two charts were extracted, 79 were included in the analysis. Three were excluded as one patient had died in the Emergency Department (ED) and 2 charts were incomplete. Most patients were male, Lebanese, and from Muslim families. These patients clinically presented with primary cardiac and oncological diseases or were admitted from the ED with respiratory distress or from the operating room for post-operative management. The primary cause of death was multiorgan failure and cardiac arrest. Only 34% of families had agreed to a DNR order prior to death and 10% suggested “soft” resuscitation. Most discussions were held in the presence of the parents, the PICU team and the patient's primary physician. Conclusions The DNR order presents one of the most difficult challenges for all care providers involved, especially within a culturally conservative setting such as Lebanon. As the numbers suggest, it is difficult for parents to reach the decision to completely withhold resuscitative measures for pediatric patients, instead opting for “soft” resuscitations like administering epinephrine without chest compressions.

The Growth of Palliative Practice and End of Life Care in an Academic Teaching Intensive Care Unit

Objective Dying in the intensive care unit (ICU) has changed over the last twenty years due to increased utilization of palliative care. We sought to examine how palliative medicine (PM) integration into critical care medicine has changed outcomes in end of life including the utilization of do not resuscitate (no cardiopulmonary resuscitation but continue treatment) and comfort care orders (No resuscitation, only comfort medication). Design: Retrospective observational review of critical care patients who died during admission between two decades, 2008 to 09 and 2018 to 19. Setting: Single urban tertiary care academic medical center in Washington, D.C. Patients: Adult patients who were treated in any ICU during the admission which they died. Interventions and Measurements We sought to measure PM involvement across the two decades and its association with end of life care including do not resuscitate (DNR) and comfort care (CC) orders. Main Results: 571 cases were analyzed. Mean age was 65 ± 15, 46% were female. In univariate analysis significantly more patients received PM in 2018 to 19 (40% vs. 27%, p = .002). DNR status increased significantly over time (74% to 84%, p = .002) and was significantly more common in patients who were receiving PM (96% vs. 72%, p < 0.001). CC also increased over time (56% to 70%, p = <0.001), and was more common in PM patients (87% vs. 53%, p < 0.001). Death in the ICU decreased significantly over time (94% to 86%, p = .002) and was significantly lower in PM patients (76% vs. 96%, p < 0.001). The adjusted odds of getting CC for those receiving versus those not receiving PM were 14.51 (5.49-38.36, p < 0.001) in 2008 to 09 versus 3.89 (2.27-6.68, p < 0.001) in 2018 to 19. Conclusion: PM involvement increased significantly across a decade in our ICU and was significantly associated with incidence of DNR and CC orders as well as the decreased incidence of dying in the ICU. The increase in DNR and CC orders independent of PM over the past decade reflect intensivists delivering PM services.

Outcomes of advance care directives after admission to a long-term care home: DNR the DNH?

Background Residents of long-term care homes (LTCH) often experience unnecessary and non-beneficial hospitalizations and interventions near the end-of-life. Advance care directives aim to ensure that end-of-life care respects resident needs and wishes. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we used multistate models to examine the health trajectories associated with Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) and Do-Not-Hospitalize (DNH) directives of residents admitted to LTCH in Ontario, Alberta, and British Columbia, Canada. We adjusted for baseline frailty-related health instability. We considered three possible end states: change in health, hospitalization, or death. For measurements, we used standardized RAI-MDS 2.0 LTCH assessments linked to hospital records from 2010 to 2015. Results We report on 123,003 LTCH residents. The prevalence of DNR and DNH directives was 71 and 26% respectively. Both directives were associated with increased odds of transitioning to a state of greater health instability and death, and decreased odds of hospitalization. The odds of hospitalization in the presence of a DNH directive were lowered, but not eliminated, with odds of 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.65–0.69), 0.63 (0.61–0.65), and 0.47 (0.43–0.52) for residents with low, moderate and high health instability, respectively. Conclusion Even though both DNR and DNH orders are associated with serious health outcomes, DNH directives were not frequently used and often overturned. We suggest that policies recommending DNH directives be re-evaluated, with greater emphasis on advance care planning that better reflects resident values and wishes.

Investigating Key Factors Related to the Decision of a Do-Not-Resuscitate Consent

Background: The decision to sign a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) consent is critical for patients concerned about their end-of-life medical care. Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Administration (NHIA) introduced a family palliative care consultation fee to encourage family palliative care consultations; since its implementation, identifying which families require such consultations has become more important. In this study, the Taiwanese version of the Palliative Care Screening Tool (TW–PCST) was used to determine each patient’s degree of need for a family palliative care consultation. Objective: This study analyzed factors associated with signing DNR consents. The results may inform family palliative care consultations for families in need, thereby achieving a higher DNR consent rate and promoting the effective use of medical resources, including time, labor, and funding. Method: In this retrospective study, logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine which factors affected the DNR decisions of 2144 deceased patients (aged ≥ 20 years), whose records were collected from the Taipei City Hospital health information system from 1 January to 31 December 2018. Results: Among the 1730 patients with a DNR consent, 1298 (75.03%) received family palliative care consultations. The correlation between DNR consent and family palliative care consultations was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Through logistic regression analysis, we determined that participation in family palliative care consultation, TW–PCST score, type of ward, and length of stay were significant variables associated with DNR consent. Conclusions: This study determined that TW–PCST scores can be used as a measurement standard for the early identification of patients requiring family palliative care consultations. Family palliative care consultations provide opportunities for patients’ family members to participate in discussions about end-of-life care and DNR consent and provide patients and their families with accurate medical information regarding the end-of-life care decision-making process. The present results can serve as a reference to increase the proportion of patients willing to sign DNR consents and reduce the provision of ineffective life-prolonging medical treatment.

Different Associations Between Inpatient or Outpatient Palliative Care and End-of-Life Outcomes for Hospitalized Patients With Cancer

PURPOSE Palliative care (PC) improves outcomes in advanced cancer, and guidelines recommend early outpatient referral. However, many PC teams see more inpatient than outpatient consults. We conducted a retrospective study of hospitalized patients with cancer to quantify exposure to inpatient and outpatient PC and describe associations between PC and end-of-life (EOL) quality measures. METHODS We identified all decedents admitted to an inpatient oncology unit in 1 year (October 1, 2017-September 30, 2018) and abstracted hospitalization statistics, inpatient and outpatient PC visits, and EOL outcomes. Descriptive statistics, univariate tests, and multivariate analysis evaluated associations between PC and patient outcomes. RESULTS In total, 522 decedents were identified. 50% saw PC; only 21% had an outpatient PC visit. Decedents seen by PC were more likely to enroll in hospice (78% v 44%; P < .001), have do-not-resuscitate status (87% v 55%; P < .001), have advance care planning documents (53% v 31%; P < .001), and die at home or inpatient hospice instead of in hospital (67% v 40%; P < .01). Decedents seen by PC had longer hospital length-of-stay (LOS; 8.4 v 7.0 days; P = .03), but this association reversed for decedents seen by outpatient PC (6.3 v 8.3 days; P < .001), who also had longer hospice LOS (46.5 v 27.1 days; P < .01) and less EOL intensive care (6% v 15%; P < .05). CONCLUSION PC was associated with significantly more hospice utilization and advance care planning. Patients seen specifically by outpatient PC had shorter hospital LOS and longer hospice LOS. These findings suggest different effects of inpatient and outpatient PC, underscoring the importance of robust outpatient PC.

DNR Linked to Reduced Depressive Symptoms in Nursing Home Residents During COVID-19 Illness

Prior work shows that older adults who establish future care plans have a lower risk of depression. Residents in long-term care may benefit from establishing a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order when cardiopulmonary resuscitation is unlikely to provide medical benefit. The current study examines whether having a DNR order in place prior to COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with fewer depressive symptoms during the illness course. Residents at a NYC skilled nursing facility with a positive COVID-19 PCR test between 3/1/2020 – 6/1/2020 were included (N=338). The Minimum Data Set (3.0) was used to examine residents’ Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores 1-30 days after diagnosis, functional status, cognition, age, and sex. A retrospective chart review was conducted to determine whether participants had an established DNR, DNI, and/or DNH order before developing COVID-19. Forty-eight percent, 46%, and 12% of participants had a DNR, DNI, or DNH order prior to COVID-19 illness, respectively. Average PHQ-9 score was 1.65 (SD=2.37). A hierarchical regression showed that after controlling for age (β=-.13, p=.06), sex (β=-.08, p=.28), cognition (β=.14, p=.04), and functional status (β=.23, p=.001; R2=.10, p=.001), having a DNR (β=-.22, p=.006) order in place prior to COVID illness was associated with lower endorsement of depressive symptoms during illness (ΔR2=.04, p=.01). Results suggest that establishing a DNR in long-term care residents when appropriate may potentially buffer depressive symptoms during illness in nursing home residents regardless of their age, sex, cognitive abilities, and functional status. Future examination of the underlying mechanism is warranted.

Variables Impacting Nursing Home Goals of Care Discussions and Order Implementation During COVID-19

Nursing home (NH) residents are especially vulnerable to COVID-19, disproportionately suffering from severe illness and death. As such, resident Goals of Care (GOC) often had to be quickly established to ensure treatment preferences were known and respected. This study examined variables related to the occurrence of GOC discussions and added orders (Do Not Resuscitate, Do Not Intubate, and Do Not Hospitalize), including demographic, physical functioning, cognitive impairment, depression, number of diagnoses, and Optum participation (Optum provided added specialized care by nurse practitioners who routinely address GOC preferences). Subjects were 286 COVID positive residents from a large NYC NH. All data were obtained from the NH’s electronic medical records. Patient median age was 81 n (interquartile range 71-88), 59% were female, 61% were long stay (stay &gt;100 days) and 39% were short stay. Using bivariate correlations we found that older short stay residents were more likely to have GOC conversations. Additionally, older, cognitively impaired, Optum participants were more likely to have orders added. When all independent variables were entered into binary logistic regressions, only older age and being a primary English speaker were significantly related to the occurrence of GOC conversations (□2= 21.76**; N=278; Nagelkerke R2 = .10), while older age and being an Optum participant were related to added orders (□2=32.18**; N=164; Nagelkerke R2 = .24). Results have implications for (1) ensuring the GOC wishes of diverse populations are known and abided by and (2) improving the quality of clinician – resident GOC discussions.

Admission criteria in critically ill COVID-19 patients: A physiology-based approach

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic required careful management of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, to reduce ICU overload while facing limitations in resources. We implemented a standardized, physiology-based, ICU admission criteria and analyzed the mortality rate of patients refused from the ICU. Materials and methods In this retrospective observational study, COVID-19 patients proposed for ICU admission were consecutively analyzed; Do-Not-Resuscitate patients were excluded. Patients presenting an oxygen peripheral saturation (SpO2) lower than 85% and/or dyspnea and/or mental confusion resulted eligible for ICU admission; patients not presenting these criteria remained in the ward with an intensive monitoring protocol. Primary outcome was both groups’ survival rate. Secondary outcome was a sub analysis correlating SpO2 cutoff with ICU admission. Results From March 2020 to January 2021, 1623 patients were admitted to our Center; 208 DNR patients were excluded; 97 patients were evaluated. The ICU-admitted group (n = 63) mortality rate resulted 15.9% at 28 days and 27% at 40 days; the ICU-refused group (n = 34) mortality rate resulted 0% at both intervals (p < 0.001). With a SpO2 cut-off of 85%, a significant correlation was found (p = 0.009), but with a 92% a cut-off there was no correlation with ICU admission (p = 0.26). A similar correlation was also found with dyspnea (p = 0.0002). Conclusion In COVID-19 patients, standardized ICU admission criteria appeared to safely reduce ICU overload. In the absence of dyspnea and/or confusion, a SpO2 cutoff up to 85% for ICU admission was not burdened by negative outcomes. In a pandemic context, the SpO2 cutoff of 92%, as a threshold for ICU admission, needs critical re-evaluation.

Abstract 13607: Correlation in Hospital Survival Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest With Variation in Post-Arrest Inpatient Intervention Rates in Michigan

Introduction: Wide variations in rates of survival to hospital discharge exist for survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The potential influence of variation in post-OHCA hospital care has not been adequately explored. We hypothesized that variation of in hospital survival rates may be influenced by variation of in-hospital care in Michigan. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of a statewide cardiac arrest database constructed from two probabilistically-linked cardiac arrest registries [Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) and Michigan Inpatient Database (MIDB)] from 2014 - 2017. A novel composite rank score was created to characterize post-arrest in-hospital care, incorporating four specific interventions: left heart catheterization within 24 hours (LHC), emergent mechanical circulatory support (EMCS), targeted temperature management (TTM), and do-not-resuscitate order placed within 72 hours of arrival (DNR). The highest score (1 of 38) was given to the hospital with highest procedure rate (LHC, TTM, LHC) and the lowest rate of early DNR. Spearman’s correlation coefficients assessed the relationship between the equal weight composite rank score and rate of hospital survivors. Results: We included 3,644 patients admitted to 38 hospitals who treated >30 OHCA patients during the study period. Patient mean age was 62.4 years, and 59.3% were male. Survival, rank scores and correlation coefficients are listed below: We observed four-fold variation in survival for all patients and witnessed arrest, with a non-significant correlation with care provision. However, we identified a sixteen-fold variation in survival among unwitnessed arrests, which was significantly correlated with a higher rank of care provided. Conclusions: In Michigan, the greatest variation in survival was identified among unwitnessed arrests. This variation was robustly associated with a composite rank of in-hospital post-arrest interventions.