ECOG-ACRIN E1411 randomized phase 2 trial of bendamustine-rituximab (BR)-based induction followed by rituximab (R) ± lenalidomide (L) consolidation for Mantle cell lymphoma: Effect of adding bortezomib to front-line BR induction on PFS.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7503-7503
Author(s):  
Mitchell Reed Smith ◽  
Opeyemi Jegede ◽  
Peter Martin ◽  
Brian G. Till ◽  
Samir S. Parekh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Randomized Phase 2

7503 Background: Optimal initial therapy for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) remains uncertain. The randomized phase 2 NCTN trial E1411 tested if progression-free survival (PFS) is prolonged by addition of bortezomib (V) (1.6 mg/m2 SC/IV days 1, 8) to bendamustine-rituximab (BVR vs BR) induction and/or by addition of lenalidomide (L) to rituximab (LR vs R) consolidation. Here we report efficacy and toxicity of induction BVR vs BR. Methods: 373 pts, accrued 2012–16, stratified by MIPI and age (≥60) received 1 of 4 arms: A) BR induction x 6 followed by R x 2 yrs, B) BVR followed by R, C) BR followed by LR or D) BVR followed by LR. Eligible pts had untreated MCL, ≥ age 18 (amended from ≥60 when S1106 for < 65 closed), ECOG PS 0-2 and adequate hematologic and organ function. Pts without progressive disease during induction proceeded to consolidation. Primary induction objective was whether adding bortezomib (BVR) (Arms B + D) to BR (Arms A + C) improves PFS, irrespective of consolidation R vs LR. Design of 360 eligible treated pts would provide 93.8% power to detect 10% improvement in 2-yr PFS from 70% hypothesized for BR, corresponding to 37.4% reduction in hazard using stratified log-rank test at 1-sided 10% alpha. Efficacy population was 179 (BVR) and 180 (BR), induction treatment completed in 144 vs 153, progressive disease during induction 6 vs 7 and registration to consolidation 140 vs 145. Results: Baseline demographics did not differ between the groups, with median age 67 (range 42-90) and 13% < 60 yr, 73% men, ECOG PS 0-1 97%, MIPI Low/Med/Hi 37/29/34%. Estimated PFS at 2 yrs 79.6% BVR (95% CI 73.8-85.9) vs 74.5% BR (95% CI 68.2-81.4) (1-sided stratified log-rank p = 0.268). With median PFS follow-up 51 mos, median PFS estimated at 64.1 and 64.0 mos. Overall response rate (ORR) for BVR was 88.9% (CR 65.5%) vs 89.5% (CR 60.5%) BR (z-test 1 sided p = 0.577 for ORR). Treatment related deaths during induction were 2 in BVR (cardiac arrest, hepatitis) and 1 in BR (tumor lysis). Grade ≥ 3 toxicities were 88.1% (163/185) BVR vs 77.5% (145/187) BR. For BVR vs BR grade ≥ 3 neutropenia occurred in 52 vs 39 pts, though febrile neutropenia (7 vs 6), anemia (7 vs 8) and thrombocytopenia (18 vs 16) did not differ. Peripheral neuropathy (PN) grade 2 was 8 sensory for BVR vs 2 sensory/1 motor for BR, while grade 3 PN was 6 sensory/1 motor for BVR vs 0 with BR. The only non-hematologic grade ≥ 3 toxicity in > 5% of pts was rash (9 vs 12 pts). Conclusions: Bortezomib did not significantly improve the primary endpoint of PFS when added to BR as initial MCL therapy. ORR and CR rates at end of induction were also similar. Follow-up continues to assess the entire treatment regimen, including consolidation R vs LR, but the PFS > 5 yrs, high ORR and MRD negativity rate (Smith et al ASH 2019) in this BR-based trial support BR as a platform for MCL induction therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01415752.

scholarly journals Ibrutinib-Lenalidomide-Rituximab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Final Results from the Nordic Lymphoma Group MCL6 (PHILEMON) Phase II Trial

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 36-36
Author(s):  
Mats Jerkeman ◽  
Martin Hutchings ◽  
Riikka Räty ◽  
Karin Fahl Wader ◽  
Anna Laurell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Tp53 Mutation ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Molecular Remission ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Introduction: In spite of improvements in treatment of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), this is still considered an incurable lymphoma entity, and the majority of patients eventually relapse. Ibrutinib is a very active agent in MCL, but in vitro has been shown to partially antagonize the activity of rituximab, by suppression of NK cell activity and subsequent ADCC. Lenalidomide, on the other hand, improves rituximab-induced ADCC. In this multi-centre open-label phase II trial, we evaluated safety and efficacy of this triplet combination in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL. Methods: Patients with MCL, relapsing after or refractory to at least one rituximab-containing chemotherapy regimen, WHO PS 0-3, and measurable disease were eligible. The primary endpoint was maximal overall response rate (ORR) measured with CT and PET/CT. Minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring by PCR was performed during follow-up, according to EuroMRD criteria. Ion Torrent sequencing of the most frequently mutated genes in MCL was performed on frozen tumor cells from bone marrow at time of relapse. Health-related quality of life was assessed by the EORTC-QLQ C30 questionnaire before and during treatment. Treatment schedule: Induction phase: Up to twelve 28-day cycles with: Lenalidomide 15 mg p o daily, days 1-21, Ibrutinib 560 mg p o days 1-28, Rituximab 375 mg/m2 i v day 1 in cycle 1, then 1400 mg s c (or 375 mg/m2i v) days 8, 15 and 22 in cycle 1, then day 1 in cycles 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11. Maintenance phase: For patients in CR, PR or SD, not in need of other treatment, given until progression, cycle duration 56 days. Ibrutinib: 560 mg p o days 1-56, 2. Rituximab 1400 mg s c (or 375 mg/m2i v) day 1 of each cycle. Results: Accrual of 50 pts was completed in June 2016, at 10 centres in Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland. The median age was 69.5 years, with a median MIPI score of 6.2. Patients had received a median of two previous regimens, four had progressed after single agent ibrutinib, and three had received prior allo-SCT. A TP53 mutation was detected in 11 of 49 evaluable cases (22%), 8 cases were of blastoid/pleomorphic histology, and 22 of 40 evaluable cases had a Ki67 &gt;30%. Treatment emergent-AEs of any grade in ≥20% of patients were rash (24%) and fatigue (20%). Five pts (10%) experienced rash grade 3, mainly during cycle 1. Hematological toxicity was generally of low grade, apart from grade 3-4 neutropenia in 5 patients. One patient died due to possible treatment-related toxicity (septic shock). In total, 27 patients achieved CR (54%) and 10 PR (20%). Among evaluable patients with a TP53 mutation, blastoid/pleomorphic histology or Ki67 &gt;30%, the CR rates were 7/11 (64%), 15/8 (62%) and 11/22 (50%), respectively. After a median follow-up of 40 months, the median PFS is 18 months (95% CI 6.5-28), and median OS 47 months (95% CI 30-64). Patients with a detectable TP53 mutation at relapse (n=11) had a median PFS of 13 months (95% CI 4.2-21), whereas pts without a TP53 mutation had a median PFS of 34 months (95% CI 8.3-60). Of the 28 patients evaluable for MRD at 6 months, 15/27 (56%) patients achieved molecular remission in blood and 12/28 (43%) in bone marrow. After 12 months, MRD-negativity in BM was 68% (13/19). Out of 4 patients with TP53-mutated MCL, 2 were MRD-negative in BM after 12 months, as well as 2 out of 4 patients with blastoid/pleomorphic histology. By self-reported HRQOL, a lower level of emotional functioning (EF), as well as a higher level of pain (PA) at baseline, was associated with inferior PFS. In addition, low EF was associated with inferior OS. By a Cox regression multivariable analysis, including MIPI, TP53, histology, Ki67, EF and PA, only MIPI was prognostic for PFS or OS with this regimen. Conclusions: The combination of ibrutinib, lenalidomide and rituximab has been shown to be an active and well tolerated regimen in this cohort of high risk R/R MCL, associated with a high rate of molecular remission. The activity in TP53 mutated MCL is lower than in unmutated disease, but this regimen may still serve as an option for a bridge to an allogeneic transplantation or CAR-T therapy in this category of patients. Disclosures Jerkeman: Roche: Research Funding; Abbvie: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Hutchings:Genmab: Honoraria; Genmab: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Roche: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Daiichi: Research Funding; Sankyo: Research Funding; Genmab: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy; Takeda: Honoraria.

High Remission Rates and Prolonged Progression Free Survival in Newly Diagnosed Patients with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Treated with R-MACLOIVAM-T

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3597-3597 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J Hosein ◽  
Daniel Morgensztern ◽  
Francine Coleman ◽  
Gail Walker ◽  
Maricer Escalon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Relapse Rate ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an unfavorable subtype of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by median progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) of only 1.5 and 3–4 years respectively. Although high-dose therapy and an autotransplant may prolong OS, it does not result in a long-term disease free survival. Therefore, there is a need for novel therapeutic approaches for this entity. Methods: We conducted a single-arm phase II study in subjects with newly-diagnosed MCL to assess efficacy and safety of a novel intensive regimen R-MACLO-IVAM-T, a modification of a protocol designed by Magrath et al (JCO1996;14:925). The study size of 22 patients was based on precision of a two-sided 95% confidence interval for the 18-month progression free survival rate. Eligible subjects had a confirmed diagnosis of MCL using WHO criteria, age 18–75 years, ECOG PS ≤ 2, adequate organ function and no history of HIV or prior cancer. Lymphoma extent at presentation was assessed by standard staging procedures as well as esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy. Prior to initiating thalidomide maintenance, subjects were enrolled in the STEPS® program. Cycle 1 consisted of R-MACLO: rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV on day 1, doxorubicin 45 mg/m2 IV on day 1, cyclophosphamide 800 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and 200 mg/m2/day on days 2–5, vincristine 1.5 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 capped to 2mg, methotrexate 1.2 g/m2 IV on day 10 over 1 hour followed by 5.52 g/m2 IV over 23 hours followed by leucovorin 36 hours later. G-CSF was begun on day 13. When the ANC was >1.5×109/L, cycle 2 with R-IVAM was begun: rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV day 1, cytarabine 2 g/m2 IV every 12 hours on days 1 and 2, etoposide, 60 mg/m2 on days 1–5 and ifosfamide 1.5 g/m2 on days 1–5 with mesna. Fourteen days after ANC recovery from cycle 2, cycles 3 and 4 were given in identical fashion to 1 and 2. Four weeks after ANC recovery from cycle 4, subjects were re-staged and responses were assessed by standard criteria. Subjects achieving CR at the end of therapy received thalidomide 200 mg/day until MCL relapse or intolerable toxicity. Results: Accrual started in 4/2004 and ended in 3/2008 when the planned 22 subjects were enrolled. All subjects were evaluable for toxicity and 21 were evaluable for response. Median age was 56.5 years (range 39–73). All subjects had at least stage 3 disease with bone marrow involvement in 19 and gastrointestinal involvement in 10. Distribution according to IPI: 0–1 factor, 3; 2 factors, 8; 3 factors, 8; and 4 factors, 3. Twenty subjects had diffuse variant and 2 had blastic variant. Nineteen subjects completed all 4 cycles of therapy; treatment was stopped in 2 subjects after 2 and 3 cycles respectively, and one subject died during the first cycle. Of the 21 subjects completing 2 cycles of therapy, 20 achieved CR and one PR. Two subjects relapsed at 9 and 33 months respectively, while 19 remain relapse free after median follow-up of 25 months (range 5–51). With a total follow-up of 545 months, the estimated relapse rate is 4.4 per 100 patients per year. There were two deaths: 1 from sepsis on cycle 1 day 8 and the other in CR at 38 months from non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed 19 months after MCL. Common severe toxicities were grade 3–4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia in 33%, 19% and 17% of R-MACLO cycles and in 50%, 88% and 68% of R-IVAM cycles respectively. There were 14 bacteremias in 82 cycles, 12 of which were after R-IVAM therapy. Six episodes of reversible grade 1–2 renal toxicity occurred after methotrexate. The thalidomide maintenance dose was reduced in 6 subjects due to grade 3–4 neutropenia and reduced or stopped in 8 subjects because of grade 3–4 peripheral neuropathy. Patients remain under follow-up for relapse and survival. Conclusions: R-MACLO-IVAM-T results in a high overall response rate of 100% (95% CR and 5% PR) and a low relapse rate. At a median follow-up of 25 months, median PFS and OS were not reached. The 2-year actuarial PFS of 94% compares favorably with previously reported 2-year actuarial PFS of 40% and 67% for CHOP-like regimens without and with upfront bone marrow transplantation (Blood2005;105: 2677). The contribution of thalidomide maintenance to this outcome requires additional study. A multicenter clinical trial is suggested.

A Phase I/II Study of Lenalidomide in Combination with Rituximab in Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 2719-2719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luhua Wang ◽  
Luis Fayad ◽  
Fredrick B. Hagemeister ◽  
Sattva Neelapu ◽  
Felipe Samaniego ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 2719 Poster Board II-695 Background: Rituximab directly targets CD20 positive lymphoma cells while lenalidomide targets the microenvironment. This combination was proven effective in vitro and in vivo in mantle cell lymphoma (Wu et al, Clin Cancer Res 2008; Zhang et al, Am J Hematol 2009). Clinically, lenalidomide (Habermann et al, Br J Haematol 2009) and rituximab have single-agent activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and may be an effective combination. The goal of our study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in phase 1 and evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide plus rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory MCL in phase 2. Methods: Patients with relapsed/refractory MCL received lenalidomide on days 1–21 of every 28-day cycle, and rituximab (375 mg/m2) weekly during cycle 1. Dose escalation was used to determine the MTD with lenalidomide (10 mg, 15 mg, 20 mg, and 25 mg). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic, or grade 4 hematologic adverse events in cycle 1. Phase 2 has reached targeted enrolment with 45 patients treated at MTD. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate progression free survival rate and response duration. Median time to event in months with 95% confidence interval was calculated. Of 45 patients treated at the MTD, the median age was 66 (46–85), 91% were males. All patients had received prior rituximab and were enrolled regardless of prior rituximab sensitivity or resistance. Results: The median follow-up time for the censored observations was 11.4 months. Two DLTs occurred at 25 mg in phase 1 (hypercalcemia, non-neutropenic fever); therefore, the MTD was 20 mg. The grade 3–4 non-hematologic events included elevated AST, elevated ALT, fatigue, myalgia, tremors, ataxia, cough, deep vein thrombosis, dyspnea, edema (facial), infection, neuropathy sensory, rash, and respiratory failure. Grade 3–4 hematologic adverse events included neutropenia (37 events), neutropenic fever (4 events), and thrombocytopenia (16 events). There were no responses in patients treated at 10 mg or 15 mg. Thirty six patients (36) were evaluable for response. Nine (9) patients are too early in their treatment and are not yet eligible for response evaluation. Among the 36 evaluable patients, 11 (31%) patients achieved CR, 8 (22%) patients achieved PR, 3 (8%) patients had minor response, 6 (17%) patients had stable disease and 8 (22%) patients had progressive mantle cell lymphoma. The overall response rate (CR + PR) was 53%. Seventy eight (78%) patients achieved stable disease or better and benefited from oral Lenalidomide plus 4 doses of rituximab. The median time to response was 2 months (2–8), and the median duration of response for the 19 patients with CR or PR was 18 months (95% CI: 10.6, NA) (range1–30 months). The median progression free survival for all patients on phase 2 was 14 months (95% CI: 9.8, NA) (ranging from 1–32 months). Conclusion: Oral lenalidomide plus rituximab resulted in durable responses in relapsed/refractory MCL with a favourable toxicity profile. Disclosures: Wang: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Hagemeister:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy. Samaniego:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Yi:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding. Shah:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Elan: Consultancy; Millennium: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Bell:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Knight:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Zeldis:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Safety Results from the United States Cohort of the Ibrutinib Early Access Treatment Protocol (EAP: MCL4001) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 4461-4461
Author(s):  
Peter Martin ◽  
Andre Goy ◽  
Radhakrishnan Ramchandren ◽  
Lucille Ferrante ◽  
Vijay Reddy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Serious Adverse Events ◽  
Major Hemorrhage ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
The Us ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Bruton’s tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a critical signaling molecule in the B-cell receptor pathway. Ibrutinib is a first-in-class, once daily, oral covalent inhibitor of BTK that was approved in the US (November 2013) based on an international multi-center Phase 2 study in patients with relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), with an ORR of 68% (CR 21% and PR 47%) and median progression free survival of 13.9 months (Wang et al. NEJM 2013). This EAP was conducted in a similar patient population to provide access to ibrutinib prior to market authorization and to collect additional safety data. The results of the US cohort are reported here. Methods: This was an open-label EAP in patients with relapsed or refractory MCL, who resided in areas where ibrutinib was not available and were ineligible for ongoing ibrutinib trials. Key entry criteria were as follows: age ≥ 18 years, relapsed or refractory MCL, and no prior ibrutinib therapy. Patients received ibrutinib 560mg orally once daily in 28 day cycles until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity, no further benefit or end of study (US approval). Adverse events (Grade ≥ 3), serious adverse events, and adverse events of interest (major hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage) were collected. Results: In total,149 patients participated in the EAP at 46 US sites from May 2013 to April 2014. Median age was 68 years (range: 39-90 years) and 89% were white. Median treatment exposure was 3.65 months (range: 0.0-7.7 months), with approximately 26% of patients receiving treatment for more than 6 months. Of the 149 patients, 58.5% had refractory disease and 66.7% had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy. Adverse events grade ≥3 were reported in 59 patients (39.6%), the most common of which were neutropenia (6.7%), dyspnea (4%), anemia (3.4%) and thrombocytopenia (3.4%). Serious adverse events were reported in 46 patients (30.9%). Adverse events of interest were reported in two patients (1.3%): 1 major hemorrhage (0.7%) and 1 intracranial hemorrhage (0.7%). Ten patients (6.7%) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. The primary reason for discontinuation was progressive disease in 20 patients (13.4%) and death in 12 patients (8.1%). The majority of patients (66%) continued on therapy until the end of study (US approval). Conclusions: The safety profile observed in this US cohort of the EAP was consistent with that observed during the registration trial for MCL. No new safety signals were observed in this predominantly refractory population of patients. Moreover, this EAP provided an important mechanism for patients to receive ibrutinib prior to US approval. Disclosures Martin: Janssen: Honoraria. Ferrante:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Employment. Reddy:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Employment. Londhe:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Employment. Wildgust:Janssen Global Services: Employment. McGowan:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Employment.

Phase-2 Study of R-MACLO-IVAM-T in Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1363-1363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Izidore S. Lossos ◽  
Francine Colleman ◽  
Gail Walker ◽  
Maricer Escalon ◽  
Joseph Rosenblatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Mantle Cell

Abstract Background: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an unfavorable sub-type of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) characterized by brief progression-free survival (PFS) and median overall survival (OS) of only 3–4 y. Although high-dose therapy and an autotransplant may prolong OS, it does not result in a long-term disease free survival. Therefore, there is a great need for novel treatment strategies for this lymphoma entity. Method: We conducted a phase-2 study in subjects with newly-diagnosed MCL to assess efficacy and safety of a novel intensive regimen R-MACLO-IVAM-T, a modification of a protocol designed by Magrath et al (JCO;14;925, 1996). Eligible patients had a confirmed diagnosis of MCL using WHO criteria, age 18–75 y, ECOG PS ≤2, adequate organ function and no history of HIV or prior cancer. Lymphoma extent at presentation was assessed by standard staging procedures including colonoscopy. Prior to initiating thalidomide, subjects were enrolled into S.T.E.P.S.® program. Therapy consisted of R-MACLO (rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV on d 1, Adriamycin, 45 mg/m2 IV on d 1, cyclophosphamide, 800 mg/m2 IV on d 1 and 200 mg/m2/d on d 2–5, vincristine, 1.5 mg/m2 on d 1 and d 8 capped to 2mg, methotrexate, 1.2 g/m2 IV on d 10 IV over 1 h followed by 5.52 g/m2 over 23 h followed by leucovorin 36 h later. G-CSF was begun on d 13. When ANC was >1.5x10e9/L R-IVAM was begun including rituximab, 375 mg/m2 IV d 1, cytarabine, 2.0 g/m2 IV every 12 h on d 1 and 2, ifosfamide, 1.5 g/m2 d 1–5 with mesna and etoposide, 60 mg/m2 d 1–5. Therapy was repeated 14 d after hospital discharge. After recovery from cycle-2 subjects were re-staged and responses assessed by standard criteria. Subjects achieving CR at the end of therapy received thalidomide, 200 mg/d until lymphoma-recurrence or toxicity. Results: 18 subjects enrolled; 17 are evaluable. Median age was 59 y (range, 44–73y), all had ≥stage-3 MCL with bone marrow involvement in 15 and gastrointestinal involvement in 9. Distribution according to IPI: 0–1 factor, 2; 2 factors, 7; 3 factors, 6; and ≥4 factors, 3. 16 subjects had diffuse variant and 2, blastic variant. 14 subjects completed the 4 cycles of therapy; the therapy was stopped after 2 and 3 cycles, respectively, in the remaining two patients. 1 subject died of septicemia on d 8 of first cycle. All subjects completing ≥1 cycle achieved CR. No subject relapsed and 15 are alive with a median follow-up of 18 mo (range, 4–40 mo). One patient died at 38m from non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed 19m post MCL diagnosis. Common severe toxicities were grade-3–4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and anemia in 48%, 21% and 24% of R-MACLO cycles and in 81%, 84% and 40% of R-IVAM cycles. There were 10 bacteremias in 65 cycles 9 of which were after R-IVAM therapy. 5 episodes of reversible grade-1–2 renal toxicity occurred after methotrexate. 5 subjects receiving thalidomide had dose-reductions because of neutropenia. Conclusions The R-MACLO-IVAM-T therapy results in a high overall response rate with 100% CR and no relapses at median follow-up of 18 months. The contribution of each element of the regimen to this outcome requires study. Further clinical trials are suggested.

Mature Results From ECOG Study E1405 – A Phase II Study of VcR-CVAD with Maintenance Rituximab for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 153-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad S. Kahl ◽  
Hailun Li ◽  
Mitchell R Smith ◽  
Randy D. Gascoyne ◽  
David T. Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Group Setting ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 153 Introduction Modified R-hyperCVAD is a well-tolerated induction regimen with a high response rate in MCL. We hypothesized that the incorporation of bortezomib (Velcadea) into this regimen would enhance the complete response rates. We further hypothesized that the addition of maintenance rituximab (MR) would improve remission duration. The new regimen, VcR-CVAD with MR, was tested for safety and efficacy in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Methods Eligible patients had histologically confirmed, previously untreated MCL, PS 0–2, and adequate end organ function. The treatment plan included: bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 days 1 and 4, rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV day 1, cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 IV over 3 hrs q 12 hrs × 6 doses days 1–3, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 48 hrs days 1–2, vincristine 1 mg IV day 3, dexamethasone 40 mg po days 1–4. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for 6 cycles and all patients received G-CSF support. Patients achieving SD, PR, or CR received MR administered as 4 weekly treatments every 6 months for 2 years (protocol therapy). Patients could elect to receive high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) off protocol rather than MR. The primary endpoint of the trial was the CR rate, defined as PET-negative, marrow-negative, to VcR-CVAD induction therapy. Results Seventy-five eligible patients were enrolled between 5/07 and 10/08. Baseline characteristics include median age 62 (40–76), 58M:17F, 92% stage III/IV, and 40% with elevated LDH. MIPI risk distribution included 37% low, 36% intermediate, 19% high, 8% unknown. Sixty-eight patients (91%) completed VcR-CVAD induction therapy. Reasons for treatment discontinuation included PD (1), toxicity (4), and patient preference (2). The ORR was 97% (73/75), CR rate 68% (51/75) and PR rate 29% (22/75). Of the 22 PR patients, 11 were so coded due to no bone marrow evaluation and/or PET imaging post therapy. The CR rate in the 64 completely restaged patients was 80%. Forty-four patients proceeded to protocol planned MR while 22 patients received SCT consolidation off protocol. With a median follow up of 3.6 years, the 3-yr PFS for the MR cohort (n = 44) and entire cohort (n = 75) are 73% and 74%, respectively. OS at 3-yrs is 88%, with no difference between MR and SCT patients. The major toxicity of the induction treatment regimen was expected myelosuppression. Grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicities were rare. No patients developed grade 3–4 neuropathy. There were no serious toxicities during MR. There were no treatment related deaths. Conclusion The VcR-CVAD induction produced high overall OR (97%) and CR rates (68%) in a representative MCL patient population treated in a cooperative group setting. The 3-yr PFS (74%) and OS (88%) are highly encouraging. Remissions in patients receiving MR were as durable as patients receiving SCT consolidation. The value of bortezomib, when added to conventional chemotherapy, is currently being tested in a randomized intergroup trial (E1411). Disclosures: Kahl: Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Bortezomib as frontline treatment of mantle cell lymphoma. Smith:Millennium: Research Funding. Advani:Genentech: Research Funding. Horning:Genentech: Employment; Roche: Equity Ownership.

Phase II Study of Modified Hyper-CVAD with Rituximab Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Wisconsin Oncology Network Study.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1388-1388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad S. Kahl ◽  
James McGovern ◽  
Jules Blank ◽  
Anthony Jaslowski ◽  
Gerald Bayer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
High Response ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Rituximab Maintenance ◽  
Mantle Cell

Abstract Introduction: Mantle cell lymphoma has the poorest 5-year survival of all the non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma subtypes and appears incurable with standard therapies. High response rates are seen with CHOP plus rituximab (R), but the progression free survival (PFS) is disappointingly short (median 16–20 months). Favorable results have been reported for hyper-CVAD + R with midcycle high dose methotrexate and cytarabine, but this regimen can be prohibitively toxic for some patients. We hypothesized that eliminating methotrexate and cytarabine while adding R to the induction hyper-CVAD would produce high response rates with acceptable toxicity. We further hypothesized that adding R maintenance would prolong the PFS. Methods: Eligible patients had histologically confirmed CD20+ mantle cell lymphoma and could not have received more than 1 cycle of CHOP-like therapy for their disease prior to study entry. PS 0-2 was allowed. The treatment plan included rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV day 1, cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 IV over 3 hrs q 12 hrs X 6 doses days 1–3, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 48 hrs days 1–2, vincristine 2 mg IV day 3, dexamethasone 40 mg po days 1–4, and G-CSF 5mg/kg/day starting after therapy until ANC ≥ 4000/mm3. Cycles were repeated every 28 days, up to 6 cycles. Patients achieving at least a PR received R maintenance therapy (375 mg/m2 IV weekly X 4 doses) every 6 months for 2 years. The accrual goal was 20 patients evaluable for response. Results: Enrollment is completed. All 22 patients are evaluable for toxicity, PFS, and OS and 20 patients evaluable for response rate (2 patients died before any restaging). Patient characteristics include 20/22 male, median age 63 (40–81), median IPI 3 (1–5), and 19/22 stage IV. All patients have completed the induction chemotherapy. Six patients have completed the R maintenance, 10 remain on R maintenance, and 6 patients came off study due to progressive disease (4) or death (2). The ORR is 85% (17/20) with 3 PR, 14 CR/CRu. With a median follow up of 22.5 months (range 4–45), the median PFS and OS have not been reached. The 2-year PFS is 73% (95% CI 50–89%) and the 2-year OS is 82% (95% CI 60–95%). Responses are ongoing in 16 patients, with response duration ranging from 2+ to 39+ months. The most common grade 3–4 toxicities in the 22 patients included neutropenia (10), anemia (5), thrombocytopenia (5), and infection (4). To date, five patients who participated in this study have died (1 treatment-related neutropenic fever, 1 post-surgical infection, 3 progressive disease). The major toxicity of this treatment regimen is expected hematologic toxicity. Conclusion: Modified hyper-CVAD with rituximab maintenance demonstrates ORR comparable to conventional hyper-CVAD (85% vs. 93%) and is less toxic, especially in patients over 60. Compared with published reports for R-CHOP, we observed higher CR rates (70% vs 34–48%) and considerably longer median PFS (not yet reached vs. 16–20 months). Longer follow up will better define the effectiveness of this regimen, but the encouraging results of this pilot study provide the basis for additional study in a larger setting.

VcR-CVAD Produces a High Complete Response Rate in Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: A Phase II Study from the Wisconsin Oncology Network

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 265-265 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad Kahl ◽  
Julie Chang ◽  
Jens Eickhoff ◽  
Leslie Gilbert ◽  
Eric Rogers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Induction Regimen ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: There is no standard treatment for Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Intensive treatment strategies such as conventional R-hyperCVAD with alternating R-cytarabine/methotrexate or autologous stem cell transplant appear to improve PFS but the effect on OS is unclear. In addition, approximately 50% of newly diagnosed patients are not candidates for intensive therapies. Novel treatment strategies are needed. We have published the results of a study using a modified R-hyperCVAD induction followed by maintenance rituximab (Kahl et al, Ann Oncol 2006). This induction strategy yielded a complete response (CR) rate of 64% and the entire treatment program yielded a median PFS of 37 months. Bortezomib (Velcade) has demonstrated promising activity in relapsed MCL (Fisher et al, J Clin Onc, 2006). We hypothesized that the incorporation of Velcade (Vc) into the induction regimen would improve the CR rate. The new regimen, VcRCVAD, was tested for safety and efficacy in a phase II study at the University of Wisconsin and within the Wisconsin Oncology Network. Methods: Eligible patients had histologically confirmed mantle cell lymphoma, PS 0–2, and adequate end organ function. The final treatment plan included: Velcade 1.3 mg/m2 days 1 and 4, rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV day 1, cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 IV over 3 hrs q 12 hrs X 6 doses days 1–3, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 48 hrs days 1–2, vincristine 1 mg IV day 3, dexamethasone 40 mg po days 1–4. Due to excessive painful peripheral neuropathy (PN), 2 dose modifications were required during the course of the study. Patients 1–7 received 1.5 mg/m2 Velcade and 2 mg vincristine. Patients 8–14 received 1.3 mg/m2 Velcade and 2 mg vincristine. Patients 15–30 received 1.3 mg/m2 Velcade and 1 mg vincristine. Cycles were repeated every 21 days for 6 cycles and all patients received G-CSF cytokine support. Patients achieving at least a PR receive maintenance rituximab therapy for 5 years. Results: Enrollment is complete and all 30 patients are evaluable for response to VcRCVAD induction. Baseline characteristics include median age 60.5 (48–74), 24M:6F, 26/30 (87%) stage IV, and 12 (40%) low-risk, 8 (27%) int-risk, and 10 (33%) high-risk by MIPI. 3 patients (10%) experienced PD during induction therapy and 27 (90%) responded with 23 CR/CRu (77%) and 4 PR (13%). With a median follow up of approximately 18 months, the 18-month PFS and OS are 73% and 97%, respectively. The major toxicity of this treatment regimen is painful PN and expected hematologic toxicity. 5/7 patients in cohort 1 and 3/7 patients in cohort 2 developed grade 3 painful PN and 1 patient in cohort 2 developed grade 4 painful PN. Only 1/16 patients in the final cohort experienced grade 3 painful PN. All neuropathy eventually improved to ≤ grade 2, but 10 patients require chronic medication for symptom relief. 13/167 (8%) of the treatment cycles were complicated by neutropenic fever/infection. There were no treatment related deaths. Conclusion: The VcR-CVAD induction has produced high overall response (90%) and CR rate (77%) in a very representative MCL patient population. Comparing these data to our previous frontline MCL study, the CR rate appears to be enhanced (77% vs 64%) by the addition of Velcade. Longer follow up is needed before determining if the higher CR rate will translate into an improved PFS and OS. Because of the risk for painful PN, caution must be exercised when using vincristine and Velcade in combination. The MTD for this combination was 1 mg vincristine and 1.3 mg/m2 Velcade. The encouraging complete response rate provided the rationale for ECOG study E1405, which is testing the safety and efficacy of this induction regimen in a cooperative group setting.

Efficacy and Safety of Thalidomide In Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Results of the French ATU Program.

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1794-1794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphanie Harel ◽  
Emmanuel Bachy ◽  
Corinne Haioun ◽  
Emmanuel Gyan ◽  
Gandhi Damaj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Male Sex ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade

Abstract Abstract 1794 Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive B-cell malignancy that represents approximately 8% of lymphoma cases. Up-front treatment with intensive chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for younger patients has demonstrated improvement in prognosis and outcome but virtually all patients experience relapse. Thalidomide is an antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory drug whose mechanism of action is unclear. Promising results were reported but only on small series, with a limited median follow up. Thalidomide in France is currently not approved in this indication, but its use is allowed by French authorities (AFSSAPS) after reviewing unique patient medical chart, mainly indication (relapsed/refractory MCL) and absence of appropriate alternative treatment. There is no other inclusion or exclusion criteria based on past medical history or biological findings. Authorization has to be confirmed every 3 months, based on efficacy and safety data. Patient informed consent was required prior to inclusion. Overall, 58 patients (pts) with available data were included in this program between 06/2001 and 09/2009. There were 38 males and 20 females. At time of diagnosis, median age was 62.8 years (range 39.2–77.9); 89.5% of pts had PS £ 1; 89.7% presented with stage IV, including 78.9% with documented bone marrow involvement, 61.4% with leukemic phase and 28% with gastro-intestinal involvement. Before Thalidomide, pts received a median of 2 lines of chemotherapy (range 1–5), including ASCT for 39. All but 6 received prior Rituximab. Median time between diagnosis and start of Thalidomide was 41.8 months (range 3.5–196.8) and 2.1 months between last line of chemotherapy and Thalidomide (range 0–126.8). At time of inclusion, median age was 66.8 years (43.9-82.7); 86.2% of pts presented with stage IV and 18 (31%) with PS > 1. Thalidomide was administrated alone in 19 patients (32.7%), associated with Rituximab (n=19; 32.7%), Bortezomib (n=5; 8.6%), or both (n=9; 15.5%), or with others treatments (n=8; 13.8%). Initial dosage was 200 mg/d for 24 patients or less (100 or 50 mg/d) for 33 patients (unknown for 1 pt), according to physician decision. Grade 1–2 adverse events included fatigue, constipation and neuropathy as previously described with Thalidomide. Three pts experienced grade 3 neuropathy. There were 6 events related to thromboembolism (deep-vein thrombosis: n=5; stroke: n=1). Hematological toxicity consisted in 4 pts with grade 3 neutropenia, including 2 with febrile neutropenia. A patient experienced severe hepatitis but link with thalidomide was doubtful. Overall, 7.3% of pts experienced grade 3–4 adverse events. Finally, 13 pts discontinued Thalidomide because of toxicity, including 6 who received Rituximab and Bortezomib. The overall response rate (CR + PR) was 50%, with 12 pts (20.7%) who achieved a CR and 17 pts (29.3%) a PR, 17 pts (29.3%) had stable disease and 12 (20.7%) progressive disease. Median time to response was 3 months (range 1–8). Median follow-up was 41.3 months. For the entire cohort, 1-y TTF and OS rates were 29.3% (95% CI: 17.4–41.3) and 61.9% (95% CI: 49.0–74.8) respectively; 2-y TTF and OS rates were 10.9% (95% CI: 2.2–19.6) and 49.6% (95% CI: 36.0–63.2) respectively. In univariate analysis, factors predictive for better OS were male sex (p=0.037), stage < 4 (p=0.043), PS 0–1 (p<0.001), time since last treatment > 6 months (p=0.004) and addition of Rituximab (p=0.013). Addition of Bortezomib was not predictive for OS. LDH, leukocytes count at time of inclusion and Thalidomide dosage (200 mg/d) were only predictive for better TTF (respectively p=0.014; 0.008 and 0.041). In multivariate analysis, male sex (p=0.002), stage <4 (p=0.025), PS 0–1 (p<0.001) and time since last chemotherapy > 6 months (p=0.010) showed prognostic relevance for OS. In conclusion, in this cohort of unselected patients, efficacy of Thalidomide compare favorably with currently approved drugs for relapsed MCL such as Bortezomib (ORR : 33%, median duration of response : 9.2 months) or Temsirolimus (ORR : 22%, median PFS : 4.8 months), with less toxicity. This efficacy is comparable with others Imids such as Lenalidomide with a trend to less toxicity and a better side effect profile, justifying its use with Rituximab for relapsed MCL as well as in a maintenance schedule. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document