Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of ibrutinib plus rituximab in patients with previously untreated marginal zone lymphoma (MZL).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS7576-TPS7576
Author(s):  
Ariela Noy ◽  
Stephanie Hughes ◽  
Erin Biggar ◽  
Matthew Bogdan

TPS7576 Background: First-line treatment options for patients with MZL include single-agent immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or chemoimmunotherapy. While chemoimmunotherapy has a higher toxicity profile than immunotherapy alone, it may lead to longer progression-free survival (PFS). Rituximab, an anti-CD20 antibody, is FDA approved for the first-line treatment of follicular lymphoma but not specifically for advanced MZL. Ibrutinib is a Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved in the United States for patients with MZL who require systemic therapy and have received ≥1 prior anti-CD20-based therapy. The combination of ibrutinib and rituximab has proven effective and is well tolerated in other B-cell lymphomas; it may serve as an effective chemotherapy-free option for the treatment of previously untreated MZL. Methods: NCT04212013 is a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, phase 3 study designed to compare the efficacy of ibrutinib + rituximab vs placebo + rituximab in patients with previously untreated MZL. Adults (≥18 y) with histologically documented MZL (splenic, nodal, and extranodal subtypes), no prior systemic treatment for MZL (prior splenectomy or other local surgical or radiation treatment allowed), measurable disease on CT scan, documented evidence of need for treatment, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2 are eligible. Patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive ibrutinib 560 mg once daily or placebo; all patients will also receive rituximab 375 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of cycle 1. Subcutaneous dosing after dose 1 is allowed. Treatment with ibrutinib or placebo will continue for 30 mo or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, patient or investigator decision to withdraw, noncompliance, death, or study termination. Clinical assessments will occur every 4 weeks until week 13, at week 25, and then every 6 mo thereafter. Imaging assessments will be conducted at week 13, at week 25, and then every 6 mo thereafter. Response will be investigator assessed per the revised International Working Group for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (RECIL) criteria. At month 30, patients who have a complete response (CR) will discontinue treatment; patients who have a partial response (PR) or stable disease may continue treatment at investigator discretion. Safety will be assessed throughout the study and for 30 days after the last dose of study treatment. The primary endpoint is CR rate at month 30. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate (CR + PR), duration of response, PFS, overall survival, and safety. Enrollment has started and will continue until approximately 138 patients are enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT04212013.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS5595-TPS5595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronnie Shapira-Frommer ◽  
Jerome Alexandre ◽  
Bradley Monk ◽  
Tanja N. Fehm ◽  
Nicoletta Colombo ◽  
...  

TPS5595 Background: Cervical cancer arises in the setting of persistent infection with high-risk human papillomavirus subtypes. Many patients with early-stage and locally advanced carcinoma can be salvaged with radical surgery and chemoradiation, respectively. However, women with recurrent/metastatic disease represent a poor prognostic group with high unmet clinical needs. Incorporation of anti-angiogenesis therapy has emerged as a therapeutic option, but the survival benefit of 3.7 months over chemotherapy (CT) alone is modest (Tewari et al. NEJM 2014). Because viral tumor antigen-specific T cells reside predominantly in programmed cell death 1–expressing T-cell compartments, checkpoint inhibition may unleash a diverse antitumor T-cell response. Based on the 14.3% objective response in KEYNOTE-158, the US FDA granted accelerated approval to pembrolizumab (pembro) in June 2018 for second-line therapy and beyond. Methods: KEYNOTE-826 is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multinational trial of CT with pembro or with placebo for first-line treatment of recurrent, persistent, or metastatic cervical cancer. Patients not previously treated with CT for recurrence who are not amenable to curative treatment will be randomized 1:1 to CT + pembro 200 mg or placebo every 3 weeks. The CT regimen (paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 + cisplatin 50 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5, with or without bevacizumab 15 mg/kg) will be selected by the investigator before randomization. Stratification factors include metastasis status at diagnosis, bevacizumab use (yes/no), and tumor PD-L1 status (combined positive score <1, 1 to <10, or ≥10). Treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or voluntary patient withdrawal for up to 35 cycles (~2 years). Primary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 assessed by blinded independent central review and overall survival. Secondary endpoints are objective response, duration of response, 12-month PFS, patient-reported quality of life, and safety. Enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03635567.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9095-9095
Author(s):  
Li Zhang ◽  
Bin Wu ◽  
Linian Huang ◽  
Meiqi Shi ◽  
Yunpeng Liu ◽  
...  

9095 Background: IBI305 is a recombinant humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody, a biosimilar candidate to bevacizumab in analytical and functional comparisons. Pharmacokinetic similarity has been demonstrated in healthy males. Here we present primary efficacy and safety results from a phase 3 comparative study in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: In this double-blind, active-controlled study, subjects with advanced non-squamous NSCLC on first-line treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel were randomized (1:1) to IBI305 or bevacizumab (15 mg/kg IV Q3W). After six cycles, patients were on maintenance treatment with IBI305 or bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg IV Q3W) till progression. Clinical equivalence of the primary endpoint, confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was evaluated by comparing the 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) of the risk ratio (RR) between study arms with the prespecified margin (0.75, 1.33). Results: A total of 450 subjects were randomized (IBI305: n = 224; bevacizumab: n = 226). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between treatment arms. ORR evaluated by Independent Radiological Review Committee (IRRC) in full analysis set (FAS) was 44.3% (98/221) for IBI305 and 46.4% (102/220) for bevacizumab; the RR for ORR was 0.95 (90% CI: 0.803, 1.135). Sensitive analysis result on RRs of ORR in Intention to Treat (ITT) population (IBI305: n = 224; bevacizumab: n = 226) and other analysis set were consistent and all within the prespecified equivalence margin. The medium PFS were 8.4 months for IBI305 and 8.3 months for bevacizumab and duration of response (DOR) was also similar in both arms. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were well balanced between treatment arms and consistent with the known adverse event profile of bevacizumab. Patients developing binding antibodies were 0.5% in the IBI305 arm vs 0% in the bevacizumab arm; no subject tested positive for neutralizing antibodies. Conclusions: This is the first released phase 3 clinical study with maintenance treatment for bevacizumab biosimilar in NSCLC patients till now. The comparative study met its predefined primary endpoint that the RR for confirmed ORR was within the prespecified equivalence margin. There was no significant difference between the two arms in safety profile and immunogenicity. Clinical trial information: NCT02954172.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document