Can We Rely on Our Advance Decisions?

2020 ◽  
pp. 99-101
Author(s):  
Robert Wheeler
Keyword(s):  
2010 ◽  
pp. 197-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Lynch ◽  
Louise M Terry ◽  
Sue Battersby ◽  
Colum J Smith

Author(s):  
Jonathan Herring

This chapter examines the legal and ethical aspects of treating a patient without consent. It considers the meaning of ‘consent’ and the position of patients who lack the capacity to consent. For children who lack capacity, consent involves a delicate balance between the rights of the children and those of their parents. For adults lacking capacity, the Mental Capacity Act 2005 has emphasized the ‘best interests’ test, but has largely left open the question of how a person’s best interests are to be ascertained. The chapter also considers what weight should be attached to advance decisions (sometimes called living wills).


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oluwatoyin Sorinmade ◽  
Alex Ruck Keene ◽  
Carmelle Peisah

Abstract Some individuals develop dementia and the invariable consequence of dementia is a decline in cognition and level of functioning. Despite the effects of this illness, people with dementia still seek intimacy and companionship as part of their expression of basic human instincts and have the right to equal enjoyment of relationships and privacy for such. At the same time, they have the right to be safeguarded against abuse. The law in England and Wales, in common with the majority, if not all, jurisdictions around the world is clear on the requirement for contemporaneous consent to sexual activity, thereby creating unmet needs for people with dementia who no longer have the capacity to consent to intimacy/sexuality. This creates an impetus to find ways to empower individuals with dementia to enjoy intimacy in a safe and lawful way and enable them to live well despite dementia. This article proposes an instrument known as the Advance Decision on Intimacy, in pursuit of the concept of precedent autonomy, to empower individuals to make decisions about how they would wish to express their sexuality at a material time in future when they would have lost the capacity to consent to such acts. While the article is framed by reference to English law, the principles are of wider relevance.


2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (14) ◽  
pp. 885-888 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolyn Bennett ◽  
Jane Bray ◽  
Ben Lobo ◽  
Greg Finn

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Helen Taylor

Paramedics are legally and professionally obliged to uphold their patients' right to dignity, respect and autonomy—and this includes the general requirement to obtain their consent before proceeding with any intervention. The first instalment of this two-part article considered the challenges that this might present to the paramedic. This second article develops this theme and further explores the legal framework underpinning the decision-making process when caring for a patient approaching the end of life. It also examines issues around consent and mental capacity in more depth and addresses matters such as such as advance decisions to refuse treatment (ADRT) and do not attempt cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) decisions.


2005 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 354-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claud Regnard ◽  
Fiona Randall
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document