Mode-Specific Measurement Effects

2021 ◽  
pp. 33-56
Author(s):  
Barry Schouten ◽  
Jan van den Brakel ◽  
Bart Buelens ◽  
Deirdre Giesen ◽  
Annemieke Luiten ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Specific Measurement ◽  
Measurement Effects

scholarly journals Quantification of Measurement and Model Effects in Monopile Foundation Scour Protection Experiments

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 585
Author(s):  
Minghao Wu ◽  
Leen De Vos ◽  
Carlos Emilio Arboleda Chavez ◽  
Vasiliki Stratigaki ◽  
Maximilian Streicher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Flow Field ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Maximum Wave Height ◽  
Chaotic Flow ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Scour Protection ◽  
Damage Number ◽  
Measurement Effects

The present work introduces an analysis of the measurement and model effects that exist in monopile scour protection experiments with repeated small scale tests. The damage erosion is calculated using the three dimensional global damage number S3D and subarea damage number S3D,i. Results show that the standard deviation of the global damage number σ(S3D)=0.257 and is approximately 20% of the mean S3D, and the standard deviation of the subarea damage number σ(S3D,i)=0.42 which can be up to 33% of the mean S3D. The irreproducible maximum wave height, chaotic flow field and non-repeatable armour layer construction are regarded as the main reasons for the occurrence of strong model effects. The measurement effects are limited to σ(S3D)=0.039 and σ(S3D,i)=0.083, which are minor compared to the model effects.

Cell Cycle-specific Measurement of γH2AX and Apoptosis After Genotoxic Stress by Flow Cytometry

10.3791/59968 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon Lopez Perez ◽  
Franziska Münz ◽  
Jonas Kroschke ◽  
Jannek Brauer ◽  
Nils H. Nicolay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Specific Measurement

Revenue management and price optimization techniques in the hotel sector

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 720-752 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aldric Vives ◽  
Marta Jacob ◽  
Marga Payeras
Keyword(s):  
Revenue Management ◽  
Airline Industry ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Customer Segmentation ◽  
Optimization Techniques ◽  
Hotel Management ◽  
Price Optimization ◽  
Hotel Sector ◽  
Measurement Effects

Pricing and revenue management (RM) techniques have become a popular field of research in hotel management literature. The sector’s background framework and evolution and the widespread use of new technologies have allowed a customer-oriented approach to be taken to pricing and the development of RM tools, while also contributing to better processes in hotel management performance at individual hotel level. Thus, price optimization (PO) methods that seek to maximize hotel revenue are based on inventory scarcity, customer segmentation and pricing. In the hotel sector, as in the airline industry, different pricing policies have a greater impact than competition measurement effects. This is mainly as differentiation strategies and specific policies at hotels can reduce the pressure of a competitive environment. The main contributions of the article are the presentation, description and classification of the principal RM and PO techniques in hotel sector literature.

Reassessment of plasma angiotensins measurement: Effects of protease inhibitors and sample handling procedures

Peptides ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1135-1141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuhiko Kohara ◽  
Yoshikatsu Tabuchi ◽  
Preenie Senanayake ◽  
K.Bridget Brosnihan ◽  
Carlos M. Ferrario
Keyword(s):  
Protease Inhibitors ◽  
Sample Handling ◽  
Measurement Effects

scholarly journals Talent measurement: A holistic model and routes forward

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory J. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Talent Management ◽  
Holistic Model ◽  
Specific Measurement ◽  
Managerial Implications ◽  
Development Approach ◽  
Value Add ◽  
Theoretical Foundations ◽  
Theory Review

Orientation: Talent measurement is a critical input to talent management (TM). Involving the application of measurement methodologies in order to determine the current and longer-term potential, competencies and contribution of employees and their roles, talent measurement is a growing field of interest in human resources.Research purpose: This article reviews and integrates the practice of talent measurement, including developing a model of talent measurement, rooting the practice in theory and suggesting several relatively unexplored aspects of talent measurement that may have potential for improvement or controversy.Motivation for the study: Talent measurement has not been adequately discussed and critiqued.Research approach/design and method: A theory review and development approach is taken in this article.Main findings: A holistic model for talent measurement is presented, including elements that have not received much prior attention such as theoretical foundations, the practicalities of including a role element, the advisability of using talent pools, the question of whether talent measures or status should be revealed to employees, the integration of talent pools with diversity or transformation imperatives, and others.Practical/managerial implications: Managers who employ TM should benefit from this review and set of challenges regarding the practice of talent measurement.Contribution/value-add: Although TM has been extensively discussed, the specific measurement options involved have been less well examined. Development of a holistic model and identification of outstanding controversies within it provide value to practitioners and to the evolution of TM.

scholarly journals Interpersonal Wishes and Fears with Regard to Internalized Attachment Figures: Differing Focus of Two Case Formulation Methods that use SASB

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-103
Author(s):  
Kenneth L. Critchfield ◽  
Julia Dobner-Pereira ◽  
Eliza Stucker
Keyword(s):  
Empirical Work ◽  
Theory And Practice ◽  
Case Formulation ◽  
Specific Measurement ◽  
Measurement Methodology ◽  
Areas Of Concern ◽  
Major Section ◽  
Defense Theory

This commentary is organized in parallel with Westerman’s (2021b) comparison to include focus on (1) the formulation methods used by IRT and Interpersonal Defense Theory, and then (2) their treatment implications. In each major section, comments center first on comparison of the approaches in general, and then turn to a focus on the details of Sharon’s case. In sum, we wish to underscore the need for continued empirical work in both IRT and Interpersonal Defense Theory traditions as ways to advance our field. We see each method as offering a different scope and focal areas of concern. With a mind toward the advancement of research and application along both lines of thought, our commentary provides an overview of how we see areas of alignment, divergence, and their potential meaning for theory and practice. The two methods share a great deal in terms of assumptive worldviews, prioritization of relational material, and even specific measurement methodology (SASB). Where the methods diverge, we believe it is primarily because they seek answers to different kinds of questions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document