A Logical Dynamic Systems Approach to the Regulation of Antigen-Driven Lymphocyte Stimulation

2018 ◽  
pp. 273-293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans B. Sieburg
2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 172-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence A. Pervin

David Magnusson has been the most articulate spokesperson for a holistic, systems approach to personality. This paper considers three concepts relevant to a dynamic systems approach to personality: dynamics, systems, and levels. Some of the history of a dynamic view is traced, leading to an emphasis on the need for stressing the interplay among goals. Concepts such as multidetermination, equipotentiality, and equifinality are shown to be important aspects of a systems approach. Finally, attention is drawn to the question of levels of description, analysis, and explanation in a theory of personality. The importance of the issue is emphasized in relation to recent advances in our understanding of biological processes. Integrating such advances into a theory of personality while avoiding the danger of reductionism is a challenge for the future.


Author(s):  
Alan Fogel ◽  
Stanley Greenspan ◽  
Barbara J. King ◽  
Robert Lickliter ◽  
Pedro Reygadas ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Uddalok Sen ◽  
Achintya Mukhopadhyay ◽  
Swarnendu Sen

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 988-998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Sosnowska ◽  
Peter Kuppens ◽  
Filip De Fruyt ◽  
Joeri Hofmans

In this paper, we demonstrate how an integrative approach to personality—one that combines within–person and between–person differences—can be achieved by drawing on the principles of dynamic systems theory. The dynamic systems perspective has the potential to reconcile both the stable and dynamic aspect of personality, it allows including different levels of analysis (i.e. traits and states), and it can account for regulatory mechanisms, as well as dynamic interactions between the elements of the system, and changes over time. While all of these features are obviously appealing, implementing a dynamic systems approach to personality is challenging. It requires new conceptual models, specific longitudinal research designs, and complex data analytical methods. In response to these issues, the first part of our paper discusses the Personality Dynamics model, a model that integrates the dynamic systems principles in a relatively straightforward way. Second, we review associated methodological and statistical tools that allow empirically testing the PersDyn model. Finally, the model and associated methodological and statistical tools are illustrated using an experience sampling methodology data set measuring Big Five personality states in 59 participants ( N = 1916 repeated measurements). © 2020 The Authors. European Journal of Personality published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Association of Personality Psychology


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document