CN Algorithm in Italy: Intermediate-term Earthquake Prediction and Seismotectonic Model Validation.

Author(s):  
Giovanni Costa ◽  
Antonella Peresan ◽  
Ivanka Orozova ◽  
Giuliano Francesco Panza ◽  
Irina M. Rotwain
2017 ◽  
Vol 59 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matteo Taroni ◽  
Warner Marzocchi ◽  
Pamela Roselli

<p>The quantitative assessment of the performance of earthquake prediction and/or forecast models is essential for evaluating their applicability for risk reduction purposes. Here we assess the earthquake prediction performance of the CN model applied to the Italian territory. This model has been widely publicized in Italian news media, but a careful assessment of its prediction performance is still lacking. In this paper we evaluate the results obtained so far from the CN algorithm applied to the Italian territory, by adopting widely used testing procedures and under development in the Collaboratory for the Study of Earthquake Predictability (CSEP) network. Our results show that the CN prediction performance is comparable to the prediction performance of the stationary Poisson model, that is, CN predictions do not add more to what may be expected from random chance.</p>


1999 ◽  
Vol 154 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Peresan ◽  
G. Costa ◽  
G. F. Panza

1999 ◽  
Vol 42 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Peresan ◽  
G. Costa ◽  
G. F. Panza

A regionalization of the Italian territory, strictly based on seismotectonic zoning and the main geodynamic features of the Italian area, is proposed for intermediate-term earthquake prediction with CN algorithm. Three regions, composed of adjacent zones with the same seismogenic behaviour or with transitional properties, are selected for the north, centre and south of Italy, compatibly with the kinematic model. This regionalization allows us an average reduction of the spatial uncertainty of about 35% for the northern and central regions, and of about 70% for the southern region in comparison with previous studies. A general reduction of the percentage of total TIPs, with respect to the results obtained neglecting the seismotectonic zoning, has been observed as well. Therefore, it seems that the seismotectonic model is a useful tool selection of the fault systems involved in the preparation of strong earthquakes. The successful attempt of catalogue upgrading, accomplished using the NEIC Preliminary Determinations of Epicentres, appears to substantiate the robustness of the algorithm against changes in the catalogue.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document