Binary Response Regression

2021 ◽  
pp. 215-240
Author(s):  
Gary L. Rosner ◽  
Purushottam W. Laud ◽  
Wesley O. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Binary Response

Bootstrap based model checks with missing binary response data

2013 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 219-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerhard Dikta ◽  
Sundarraman Subramanian ◽  
Thorsten Winkler
Keyword(s):  
Binary Response ◽  
Response Data ◽  
Binary Response Data

F-Test Alternatives to Fisher’s Exact Test and to the Chi-Square Test of Homogeneity in 2 × 2 Tables

1983 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
John E. Overall ◽  
Robert R. Starbuck
Keyword(s):  
Beta Distribution ◽  
Binary Response ◽  
Binomial Model ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Exact Probability ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Mutual Dependence ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Test Of Homogeneity ◽  
Chi Square Test

A binomial model is proposed for testing the significance of differences in binary response probabilities in two independent treatment groups. Without correction for continuity, the binomial statistic is essentially equivalent to Fisher’s exact probability. With correction for continuity, the binomial statistic approaches Pearson’s chi-square. Due to mutual dependence of the binomial and F distributions on the beta distribution, a simple F statistic can be used for computation instead of the binomial.

Binary response Se/ZnO p-n heterojunction UV photodetector with high on/off ratio and fast speed

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1600257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Hu ◽  
Feng Teng ◽  
Lingxia Zheng ◽  
Pingping Yu ◽  
Zhiming Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binary Response ◽  
Uv Photodetector ◽  
Fast Speed

scholarly journals Conjoint Analysis of Groundwater Protection Programs

1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas H. Stevens ◽  
Christopher Barrett ◽  
Cleve E. Willis
Keyword(s):  
Contingent Valuation ◽  
Conjoint Analysis ◽  
Groundwater Protection ◽  
Economic Value ◽  
Model Specification ◽  
Binary Response ◽  
Response Model ◽  
Dichotomous Choice ◽  
Binary Response Model

Three conjoint models—a traditional ratings model, a ratings difference specification, and a binary response model—were used to value groundwater protection program alternatives. The last, which is virtually identical to a dichotomous choice contingent valuation specification, produced the smallest value estimates. This suggests that the conjoint model is very sensitive to model specification and that traditional conjoint models may overestimate economic value because many respondents are not in the market for the commodity being valued.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document