scholarly journals PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE CARE UNIT NOSOCOMIAL INFECTION RISK ASSESSMENT MODEL.† 664

1996 ◽  
Vol 39 ◽  
pp. 113-113
Author(s):  
Nalini Singh-Naz ◽  
Bruce M Sprague ◽  
Kantilal M Patel ◽  
Murray M Pollack
1989 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 515-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.L. Ford-Jones ◽  
C.M. Mindorff ◽  
E. Pollock ◽  
R. Milner ◽  
D. Bohn ◽  
...  

AbstractTo improve the efficiency of nosocomial infection detection, a highly structured system combining initial reporting by the bedside night nurse of symptoms possibly related to infection with follow-up by the infection control nurse (ICN) was developed: The Infection Control Sentinel Sheet System (ICSSS).Between July 1, 1987 and February 28, 1988, a prospective comparison of results obtained through ICSSS and daily bedside observation/chart review by a full-time trained intensivist was undertaken in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Ratios of nosocomial infections and nosocomially-infected patients were 15.8 and 7.0 respectively among 685 admissions; included are seven infections identified only through the ICSSS so that the “gold standard” became an amalgamation of the two systems. The sensitivity for detection of nosocomially-infected patients by bedside observation/chart review and ICSSS was 100% and 87% respectively. The sensitivity for detection of standard infections (blood, wound and urine) was 88% and 85% respectively. The sensitivity for detection of nosocomial infections at all sites was 94% and 72% respectively. Missed infections were minor (e.g., drain, skin, eye), required physician diagnosis (e.g., pneumonia), were not requested on the sentinel sheet (SS) (e.g., otitis media), related to follow-up of deceased patients or were minor misclassifications or failures to associate with device (e.g., central-line related). Daily PICU surveillance by the ICN required only 20 minutes a day. The ICSSS appears highly promising and has many unmeasured benefits.


1991 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 160-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
EVELYN POLLOCK ◽  
E. LEE FORD-JONES ◽  
MARY COREY ◽  
GEOFFREY BARKER ◽  
CATHY M. MINDORFF ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 79 (2) ◽  
pp. 313-314
Author(s):  
JOHN M. PASCOE

To the Editor.— Dr Donowitz described an interesting research project in which the efficacy of overgown use in the prevention of pediatric intensive care unit nosocomial infection was examined.1 He concludes that "overgowns were an expensive and ineffective method of preventing or decreasing nosocomial infections."1 Although Dr Donowitz may be correct, his inattention to sample size and statistical power in this negative trial makes his argument less than compelling. Given the nosocomial "base rate" of about 10% without gowns, the detection of an infection rate difference of 50% between the nongown and gown subgroups (α = .05, β = .2) would require a sample size of about 500 in each subgroup.2


2008 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 1171-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pradeep Vaideeswar ◽  
S. B. Bavdekar ◽  
Sandhya M. Jadhav ◽  
Rajiv Balan ◽  
Shobhana P. Pandit

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document