Sex Differences on the Revised Beck Depression Inventory for Outpatients With Affective Disorders

1989 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 693-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert A. Steer ◽  
Aaron T. Beck ◽  
Gary Brown
1993 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard C. Evenson ◽  
Scott T. Meier ◽  
Brian J. Hagan

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 272-281 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Høye ◽  
Ragnar Nesvåg ◽  
Ted Reichborn-Kjennerud ◽  
Bjarne K. Jacobsen

1982 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-76
Author(s):  
James F. Calhoun ◽  
Rafael J. Paralade ◽  
Robert A. Moss

The present study was designed to evaluate the hypothesis that a group of depressed subjects would tend to make more internal and stable attributions of causality in potentially problematic social situations than would a group of nondepressed subjects. A group of 215 undergraduate psychology students were divided into depressed (n=30) and nondepressed (n=185) groups on the basis of results on the Beck Depression Inventory. Each subject was presented a series of 12 brief vignettes depicting potentially problematic social situations. After reading each vignette, subjects rated then? as to internal/external causality and along a stable/unstable dimension. Although the results provide support for the hypothesis, the need to replicate the findings with non-student populations was emphasized prior to generalizing the results to more general depressive populations.


1986 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 696-698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolf J. Bosscher ◽  
Hans Koning ◽  
Rob Van Meurs

The reliability and the validity of the standard 21-item form of the Beck Depression Inventory were investigated for a sample of 85 female and 118 male university students. No sex differences were observed. The internal consistency reliability was .82. The Zung Self-rating Depression Scale was used as a congruent depression scale and correlated significantly with the Beck scores ( r = .69). The results indicate a satisfactory reliability and validity for the translated Beck inventory, although the use of a nonclinical sample prevents generalization to clinically depressed populations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
David R. Rubinow ◽  
Peter J. Schmidt

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Sikes-Keilp ◽  
David R. Rubinow

AbstractSex differences in the rates of affective disorders have been recognized for decades. Studies of physiologic sex-related differences in animals and humans, however, have generally yielded little in terms of explaining these differences. Furthermore, the significance of these findings is difficult to interpret given the dynamic, integrative, and highly context-dependent nature of human physiology. In this article, we provide an overview of the current literature on sex differences as they relate to mood disorders, organizing existing findings into five levels at which sex differences conceivably influence physiology relevant to affective states. These levels include the following: brain structure, network connectivity, signal transduction, transcription/translation, and epigenesis. We then evaluate the importance and limitations of this body of work, as well as offer perspectives on the future of research into sex differences. In creating this overview, we attempt to bring perspective to a body of research that is complex, poorly synthesized, and far from complete, as well as provide a theoretical framework for thinking about the role that sex differences ultimately play in affective regulation. Despite the overall gaps regarding both the underlying pathogenesis of affective illness and the role of sex-related factors in the development of affective disorders, it is evident that sex should be considered as an important contributor to alterations in neural function giving rise to susceptibility to and expression of depression.


2001 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 521-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oksoo Kim

This study examined the sex differences in reports of social support (network size and satisfaction), loneliness, and depression among Korean college students and examined whether measures of social support and loneliness predicted depression scores. In the sample were 452 college students enrolled in four universities in Korea. The women reported a larger social support network size and being less satisfied with their support than the men. Women reported higher scores on the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory than men. Social support satisfaction scores and network size on the Social Support Questionnaire–6 and scores on the Loneliness Scale predicted scores on Depression in both the groups. Loneliness was the largest predictor of Depression for either sex. The amount of variance in Depression accounted for by Loneliness was 35% for women and 24% for men.


Author(s):  
Maget A ◽  
Dalkner N ◽  
Hamm C ◽  
Bengesser SA ◽  
Fellendorf F ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Liisa Hantsoo ◽  
Carla E. M. Golden ◽  
Sara Kornfield ◽  
Christian Grillon ◽  
C. Neill Epperson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document