FDA adds another weight loss drug to the US market

Keyword(s):  
The Us ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 45 (13) ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
ELIZABETH MECHCATIE
Keyword(s):  

The Lancet ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 371 (9612) ◽  
pp. 555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Pierre Després ◽  
Luc Van Gaal ◽  
Xavier Pi-Sunyer ◽  
André Scheen

2020 ◽  
Vol 54 (7) ◽  
pp. 691-705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanan Khalil ◽  
Laura Ellwood ◽  
Heidi Lord ◽  
Ritin Fernandez

Objective: To synthesize the evidence from systematic reviews of clinical trials investigating the effectiveness of pharmacological therapies approved by the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration and the US Food and Drug Administration for the management of obesity in adults. Data Sources: A 3-step literature search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PubMed databases was conducted between March and May 2019. The key terms used were obesity, pharmacological therapy, antiobesity agent, antiobesity medication, weight loss, and systematic review. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Systematic reviews that evaluated the effectiveness of pharmacological therapies for the management of obesity in patients with a body mass index of or greater than 25 kg/m2. Data Synthesis: Nine systematic reviews involving three pharmacotherapies, liraglutide, orlistat, and naltrexone-bupropion were identified. The results indicate that the pharmacotherapies reduced weight when compared with placebo. Orlistat was effective in significantly reducing fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, total cholesterol, triglycerides, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. All reviews discussed the presence or risk of gastrointestinal adverse effects including diarrhea, vomiting, and nausea related to orlistat and liraglutide. Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice: This umbrella review compares the efficacy and safety of antiobesity medications for reducing weight and a discussion on their weight loss and metabolic control to guide clinicians when prescribing medications for obesity. Conclusions: All pharmacological therapies included in this review are superior to placebo in reducing weight. Clinicians should consider patient comorbidities and risk of adverse events when recommending medications for weight loss.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11-11
Author(s):  
J. L. Dikken ◽  
C. J. Van De Velde ◽  
M. Verheij ◽  
R. Baser ◽  
M. Gonen ◽  
...  

11 Background: The risk of dying of cancer is highest in the first two years after a curative resection for gastric cancer. Therefore, the prognosis of patients who did not recur in the first two years is improved because they survived this critical period, a phenomenon called conditional survival. The US-derived gastric cancer nomogram predicts disease-specific survival (DSS) based on pathological variables. However, a disease-free interval after surgery, which improves the prognosis, is not captured by the nomogram. Therefore, it has only been used directly after surgery and not in the follow-up setting. The purposes of this study were to develop a conditional survival nomogram for 1, 2 and 3-year survivors (step 1) and to test if the introduction of follow-up variables would improve predictive accuracy of the nomogram in the follow-up setting (step 2). Methods: In a combined US-Dutch population of 1642 patients who underwent an R0 resection for gastric cancer and for whom the old nomogram variables were available, a conditional survival nomogram based on the original variables was developed for one (N=1147), two (N=879) and three (N=721) year survivors (step 1). To improve predictive accuracy in the follow-up setting, weight loss, performance status (PS), hemoglobin (HGB), and albumin (ALB) at one year after resection were retrospectively collected and added to the baseline variables in a new nomogram (step 2). Results: The conditional survival nomograms for 1, 2 and 3-year survivors (step 1) showed a high predictive accuracy in the calibration plots. Surviving one, two and three years shows a median improvement of 5-year DSS of 4%, 9% and 14% respectively. The introduction of weight loss, PS, HGB, and ALB at one year after surgery (step 2) did not improve this nomogram, but availability of these variables was limited. Conclusions: A strongly predictive conditional survival nomogram was developed, giving an improved prognosis for 1, 2 and 3-year survivors of gastric cancer. Introduction of variables available at one year after resection did not further improve this nomogram. This might be caused by the limited availability of follow-up data, as well as the strong predictive accuracy of the original variables. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document