Financial relationships between neurologists and industry

Neurology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 92 (21) ◽  
pp. 1006-1013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditi Ahlawat ◽  
Pushpa Narayanaswami
Keyword(s):  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
The United States ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Regional Trends ◽  
Food And Beverage ◽  
Data Book ◽  
Retrospective Database Analysis ◽  
Incorrect Information ◽  
Open Payments ◽  
Retrospective Database

ObjectiveTo analyze research and nonresearch payments from the pharmaceutical and device industry to neurologists in 2015 using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments Database.MethodsIn this retrospective database analysis, we computed the percentage of neurologists in the United States receiving payments, the median/mean payments per neurologist, payment categories, regional trends, and sponsors. We computed the number of practicing neurologists from the Association of American Medical Colleges State Physician Workforce Data Book, 2015.ResultsIn 2015, approximately 96% of US neurologists received nonresearch payments totaling $93,920,993. The median payment per physician was $407. The highest proportion of neurologists (24%) received between $1,000 and $10,000. Food and beverage was the most frequent category (83% of the total number of payments). The highest amount was paid for serving as faculty/speaker for noncontinuing medical education activities (49%). The top sponsor of nonresearch payments was Teva Pharmaceuticals ($16,461,055; 17.5%). A total of 412 neurologists received $2,921,611 in research payments (median $1,132). Multiple sclerosis specialists received the largest proportion ($285,537; 9.7%). Daiichi Sankyo paid the largest amount in research payments ($826,029; 28%).ConclusionsThe Open Payments program was established to foster transparent disclosure of physician compensations from industry, in response to legislative and public concerns of the effect of conflicts of interest on practice, education, and research. The effects of this program remain unclear and studies of changes in prescribing practices, costs, and other outcomes are necessary. CMS should ensure that incorrect information can be rectified quickly and easily.

Financial relationships between neurologists and industry

Neurology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 90 (23) ◽  
pp. 1063-1070 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aditi Ahlawat ◽  
Pushpa Narayanaswami
Keyword(s):  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
The United States ◽  
Prescribing Practices ◽  
Physician Compensation ◽  
Regional Trends ◽  
Food And Beverage ◽  
Data Book ◽  
Incorrect Information ◽  
Open Payments ◽  
Retrospective Database

ObjectiveTo analyze research and nonresearch payments from the pharmaceutical and device industry to neurologists in 2015 using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments database.MethodsIn this retrospective database analysis, we computed the percentage of neurologists in the United States receiving payments, the median/mean payments per neurologist, payment categories, regional trends, and sponsors. We computed the number of practicing neurologists from the Association of American Medical Colleges State Physician Workforce data book, 2015.ResultsIn 2015, approximately 51% of US neurologists received nonresearch payments totaling $6,210,414. The median payment per physician was $81. Payments to the top 10% of compensated neurologists amounted to $5,278,852 (84.5%). Food and beverage was the most frequent category (86.5% of the total number of payments). The highest amount was paid for serving as faculty/speaker for noncontinuing medical education activities (58%). The top sponsor of nonresearch payments was Teva Pharmaceuticals ($1,162,900; 18.5%). A total of 412 neurologists received $2,921,611 in research payments (median $1,132). Multiple sclerosis specialists received the largest proportion ($285,537; 9.7%). Daiichi Sankyo paid the largest amount in research payments ($826,029; 28%).ConclusionsThe Open Payments program was established to foster transparent disclosure of physician compensation from industry, in response to legislative and public concerns over the effect of conflicts of interest on practice, education, and research. The effects of this program remain unclear and studies of changes in prescribing practices, costs, and other outcomes are necessary. CMS should ensure that incorrect information can be rectified quickly and easily.

scholarly journals The adult vaccination landscape in the United States during the Affordable Care Act era: Results from a large retrospective database analysis

Vaccine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (14) ◽  
pp. 2984-2994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Aris ◽  
Marion Montourcy ◽  
Elizabeth Esterberg ◽  
Samantha K. Kurosky ◽  
Sara Poston ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Affordable Care Act ◽  
The United States ◽  
Database Analysis ◽  
Adult Vaccination ◽  
Retrospective Database Analysis ◽  
The Affordable Care Act ◽  
Retrospective Database

scholarly journals Industry Payment to Vascular Neurologists

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 1339-1343 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna Nalleballe ◽  
Sen Sheng ◽  
Chenghui Li ◽  
Ruchira Mahashabde ◽  
Amarnath R. Annapureddy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
American Heart Association ◽  
American Heart ◽  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
The United States ◽  
Regional Trends ◽  
Impact Patient Care ◽  
And Behavior

Background and Purpose— Industry payments to physicians raise concerns regarding conflicts of interest that could impact patient care. We explored nonresearch and nonownership payments from industry to vascular neurologists to identify trends in compensation. Methods— Using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology data, we explored financial relationships between industry and US vascular neurologists from 2013 to 2018. We analyzed payment characteristics, including payment categories, payment distribution among physicians, regional trends, and biomedical manufacturers. Furthermore, we analyzed the top 1% (by compensation) of vascular neurologists with detailed payment categories, their position, and their contribution to stroke guidelines. Results— The number of board certified vascular neurologist increased from 1169 in 2013 to 1746 in 2018. The total payments to vascular neurologist increased from $99 749 in 2013 to $1 032 302 in 2018. During the study period, 16% to 17% of vascular neurologists received industry payments. Total payments from industry and mean physician payments increased yearly over this period, with consulting fee (31.1%) and compensation for services other than consulting (30.7%) being the highest paid categories. The top 10 manufacturers made the majority of the payments, and the top 10 products changed from drug or biological products to devices. Physicians from south region of the United States received the highest total payment (38.72%), which steadily increased. Payments to top 1% vascular neurologists increased from 64% to 79% over the period as payments became less evenly distributed. Among the top 1%, 42% specialized in neuro intervention, 11% contributed to American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines, and around 75% were key leaders in the field. Conclusions— A small proportion of US vascular neurologists consistently received the majority of industry payments, the value of which grew over the study period. Only 11% of the top 1% receiving industry payments have authored American Heart Association/American Stroke Association guidelines, but ≈75% seem to be key leaders in the field. Whether this influences clinical practice and behavior requires further investigation.

Abstract WMP96: Industry Payments to Vascular Neurologists, a Six-Year Analysis of the Open Payments Program From 2013 to 2018

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sen Sheng ◽  
Krishna Nalleballe ◽  
Aliza Brown ◽  
Syed Ali ◽  
Rohan Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Growth Rate ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
The Other ◽  
Steady Growth ◽  
Regional Trends ◽  
Open Payments ◽  
Total Payment

Objective: To analyze and characterize industry payment to vascular neurologists from 2013 to 2018 using open Payments Database. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of open payments database, which is available publicly. We calculated the percentage of vascular neurologists in the United States receiving payments and payment characteristics. We have analyzed the top 1% payment to vascular neurologist with detailed payment category analysis, payment regional trends, and sponsors each year. The number of board-certified vascular neurologists is available from the database of the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology. Results: From Jan 2013 to Dec 2018, industry payments to vascular neurologists have increased significantly each year, while a relatively stable fraction (17%) of US vascular neurologists received industry payments totaling $ 3,782,222 (6 years combined). The median payment per physician ranges from $ 115 to $ 241, while 90th percentile payments vary from $1,766 to $ 4,988 with a maximum payment up to $190,551. Nine payment categories are available and the highest amounts were paid for "Consulting Fee". The payment proportion from top 10 sponsors consists of 75% of the total amount since 2013. The payment to the south region has a steady growth rate among the other regions and has the highest payment amount of $ 470,551 in 2018. Top 1% vascular neurologists received more than 60% of the total payment. Among the top 1% vascular neurologists, 73% are likely to be key leaders in the field. Among the top 1%, 42% are specialized in neuro-intervention and less than 15% have Authored AHA/ASA guideline papers. Conclusion: Payments to vascular neurologists is highly skewed with the top 1% receiving around one-third of all payments, less than 15% of these vascular neurologists have authored AHA/ASA guidelines. The industry is known to target key leaders in the field whether this is translating to changes in clinical practice should be looked into more thoroughly.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document