Moving Beyond a Single Score: The Upward Trajectory of Perioperative Pain Assessment

2022 ◽  
Vol 134 (2) ◽  
pp. 276-278
Author(s):  
M. Gabrielle Pagé ◽  
Karim S. Ladha
2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 302-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine E. Ferland ◽  
Diana-Luk Ye ◽  
Jean A. Ouellet

2021 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Effraim F. Munsaka ◽  
Dominique Van Dyk ◽  
Romy Parker

Background: The most common major surgical procedure performed worldwide is the caesarean section (CS). Effective pain management is a priority for women undergoing this procedure, to reduce the incidence of persistent pain (a risk factor for postpartum depression), as well as optimise maternal-neonatal bonding and the successful establishment of breastfeeding. Multimodal analgesia is the gold standard for post-CS analgesia. At present, no perioperative pain management protocols could be identified for the management of patients presenting for CS at regional hospitals in South Africa. This audit aimed to review the folders of patients who underwent CS, with particular reference to perioperative pain management guidelines for CS.Methods: A descriptive, retrospective, cross-sectional audit was conducted. Three hundred folders (10% of the annual number of caesarean procedures performed) from New Somerset Hospital, a regional hospital in Cape Town, South Africa were reviewed.Results: The women were a mean age of 30 years (standard deviation [s.d.]: 6.2). Median gravidity was 3 (interquartile range [IQR]: 2–3) and parity was 1 (IQR: 1–2); 52% had previously undergone a CS. In 93.3% cases, spinal anaesthesia was employed for CS. Pain assessment was poor, with only 55 (18%) patients having their pain assessed on the day of the operation. Analgesia was prescribed in over 98% of the patients, however, medication was only administered as prescribed in 32.6%. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were prescribed in 5% of cases. None of the patients received a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, or wound infusion catheter as supplementary strategies.Conclusion: Pain management for post-CS patient at this hospital is lacking. There is the need for the implementation of a structured assessment tool to improve administration of analgesics in these patients. In addition, the reasons for the omission of NSAIDs from the analgesia regimen requires investigation. Hospital requires post-CS pain protocols to guide management especially in resource-limited settings.


2017 ◽  
Vol 126 (9) ◽  
pp. 646-653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marisa R. Buchakjian ◽  
Andrew B. Davis ◽  
Sebastian J. Sciegienka ◽  
Nitin A. Pagedar ◽  
Steven M. Sperry

Objective: To evaluate perioperative pain in patients undergoing major head and neck cancer surgery and identify associations between preoperative and postoperative pain characteristics. Methods: Patients undergoing head and neck surgery with regional/free tissue transfer were enrolled. Preoperative pain and validated screens for symptoms (neuropathic pain, anxiety, depression, fibromyalgia) were assessed. Postoperatively, patients completed a pain diary for 4 weeks. Results: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled. Seventy-eight percent had pain prior to surgery, and for 38%, the pain had neuropathic characteristics. Thirteen patients (48%) completed at least 2 weeks of the postoperative pain diary. Patients with moderate/severe preoperative pain report significantly greater pain scores postoperatively, though daily pain decreased at a similar linear rate for all patients. Patients with more severe preoperative pain consumed greater amounts of opioids postoperatively, and this correlated with daily postoperative pain scores. Patients who screened positive for neuropathic pain also reported worse postoperative pain. Conclusion: Longitudinal perioperative pain assessment in head and neck patients undergoing surgery suggests that patients with worse preoperative pain continue to endorse worse pain postoperatively and require more narcotics. Patients with preoperative neuropathic pain also report poor pain control postoperatively, suggesting an opportunity to identify these patients and intervene with empiric neuropathic pain treatment.


2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (4S) ◽  
pp. 359-359
Author(s):  
Sompol Permpongkoso ◽  
Aaron Sulman ◽  
Stephen B. Solomon ◽  
GaryX Gong ◽  
Louis R. Kavoussi

2004 ◽  
Vol 171 (4S) ◽  
pp. 44-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Todd M. Webster ◽  
S. Duke Herrell ◽  
Roxelyn G. Baumgartner ◽  
Laura Anderson ◽  
Joseph A. Smith

Pflege ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 171-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evas Cignacco

Während Erwachsene und Kinder Schmerzerlebnisse durch Sprache deuten und ihnen so Ausdruck verleihen, ist die Schmerzerfassung bei Neugeborenen wegen der fehlenden Verbalisierung nicht möglich. Die Schmerzerfassung beim Neugeborenen erfolgt indirekt und schließt physiologische, verhaltensbezogene und biochemische Parameter in die Einschätzung mit ein. Diese Literaturübersicht beschreibt die Schwierigkeiten, die der Objektivierung des Schmerzes von Neugeborenen, insbesondere Frühgeborenen, zugrunde liegen. Die meisten der existierenden Schmerzskalen wurden zu Forschungszwecken entwickelt und sind auf ihre Praktikabilität im klinischen Alltag nicht überprüft. Pflegende und ÄrztInnen stehen darum immer noch vor der Schwierigkeit, zwischen einigen zwar validierten, aber auf ihre Anwendbarkeit in der Praxis kaum überprüften Instrumente wählen zu müssen. Dies ist umso bedenklicher, als in der Literatur die kurz- und langfristigen Folgen von anhaltenden Schmerzen bei Neugeborenen mit intraventrikulären Blutungen, Veränderungen im Ernährungs- sowie im Schlafmuster und Beeinträchtigungen im sensiblen Bereich der Eltern-Kind-Beziehung beschrieben werden.


PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
James M. Raczynski
Keyword(s):  

physiopraxis ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (06) ◽  
pp. 52-53
Author(s):  
Marjan Laekeman

Schmerzerkennung bei Menschen mit Demenz, die nicht mehr zur Selbstauskunft in der Lage sind, ist für Therapeuten eine Herausforderung. Mit der PAIC-15-Skala steht ein adäquates Beobachtungsinstrument zur Verfügung, um bei dieser Patientengruppe Schmerzen rechtzeitig zu erfassen. In mehreren internationalen Studien zeigt sich, dass die 15 Items der Skala sehr gute Indikatoren dafür sind, ob ein Mensch unter Schmerzen leidet.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document