Endoscopic Augmented Reality Navigation System for Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery to Treat Pituitary Tumors: Technical Note

Neurosurgery ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 1393-1397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takakazu Kawamata ◽  
Hiroshi Iseki ◽  
Takao Shibasaki ◽  
Tomokatsu Hori
Neurosurgery ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 1393-1397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takakazu Kawamata ◽  
Hiroshi Iseki ◽  
Takao Shibasaki ◽  
Tomokatsu Hori

Abstract OBJECTIVE Endoscopes have been commonly used in transsphenoidal surgery to treat pituitary tumors, to compensate for the narrow surgical field. Although many navigation systems have been introduced for neurosurgical procedures, there have been few reports of navigation systems for endoscopic operations. This report presents our recently developed, endoscopic, augmented reality (AR) navigation system. METHODS The technology is based on the principles of AR environment technology. The system consisted of a rigid endoscope with light-emitting diodes, an optical tracking system, and a controller. The operation of the optical tracking system was based on two sets of infrared light-emitting diodes, which measured the position and orientation of the endoscope relative to the patient's head. We used the system during endonasal transsphenoidal operations to treat pituitary tumors in 12 recent cases. RESULTS Anatomic, “real,” three-dimensional, virtual images of the tumor and nearby anatomic structures (including the internal carotid arteries, sphenoid sinuses, and optic nerves) were superimposed on real- time endoscopic live images. The system also indicated the positions and directions of the endoscope and the endoscopic beam in three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomographic planes. Furthermore, the colors of the wire-frame images of the tumor changed according to the distance between the tip of the endoscope and the tumor. These features were superior to those of conventional navigation systems, which are available only for operating microscopes. CONCLUSION The endoscopic AR navigation system allows surgeons to perform accurate, safe, endoscope-assisted operations to treat pituitary tumors; it is particularly useful for reoperations, in which midline landmarks may be absent. We consider the AR navigation system to be a promising tool for safe, minimally invasive, endonasal, transsphenoidal surgery to treat pituitary tumors.


2011 ◽  
Vol 131 (7) ◽  
pp. 897-906
Author(s):  
Kengo Akaho ◽  
Takashi Nakagawa ◽  
Yoshihisa Yamaguchi ◽  
Katsuya Kawai ◽  
Hirokazu Kato ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Faiella Eliodoro ◽  
Pacella Giuseppina ◽  
Altomare Carlo ◽  
Andresciani Flavio ◽  
Zobel Beomonte Bruno ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 2315
Author(s):  
Yu-Cheng Lo ◽  
Guan-An Chen ◽  
Yin Chun Liu ◽  
Yuan-Hou Chen ◽  
Jui-Ting Hsu ◽  
...  

To improve the accuracy of bracket placement in vivo, a protocol and device were introduced, which consisted of operative procedures for accurate control, a computer-aided design, and an augmented reality–assisted bracket navigation system. The present study evaluated the accuracy of this protocol. Methods: Thirty-one incisor teeth were tested from four participators. The teeth were bonded by novice and expert orthodontists. Compared with the control group by Boone gauge and the experiment group by augmented reality-assisted bracket navigation system, our study used for brackets measurement. To evaluate the accuracy, deviations of positions for bracket placement were measured. Results: The augmented reality-assisted bracket navigation system and control group were used in the same 31 cases. The priority of bonding brackets between control group or experiment group was decided by tossing coins, and then the teeth were debonded and the other technique was used. The medium vertical (incisogingival) position deviation in the control and AR groups by the novice orthodontist was 0.90 ± 0.06 mm and 0.51 ± 0.24 mm, respectively (p < 0.05), and by the expert orthodontist was 0.40 ± 0.29 mm and 0.29 ± 0.08 mm, respectively (p < 0.05). No significant changes in the horizontal position deviation were noted regardless of the orthodontist experience or use of the augmented reality–assisted bracket navigation system. Conclusion: The augmented reality–assisted bracket navigation system increased the accuracy rate by the expert orthodontist in the incisogingival direction and helped the novice orthodontist guide the bracket position within an acceptable clinical error of approximately 0.5 mm.


2012 ◽  
Vol 180 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kengo Akaho ◽  
Takashi Nakagawa ◽  
Yoshihisa Yamaguchi ◽  
Katsuya Kawai ◽  
Hirokazu Kato ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-19
Author(s):  
Eimei Oyama ◽  
Kohei Tokoi ◽  
Ryo Suzuki ◽  
Sousuke Nakamura ◽  
Naoji Shiroma ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document