Comparative investigation of single-point and double-point incremental sheet metal forming processes

2007 ◽  
Vol 221 (12) ◽  
pp. 1725-1732 ◽  
Author(s):  
O Lasunon ◽  
W A Knight
Keyword(s):  
Sheet Metal ◽  
Sheet Metal Forming ◽  
Metal Forming ◽  
Double Point ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Comparative Investigation ◽  
Incremental Sheet Metal Forming

Preliminary Studies on the Determination of FLD for Single Point Incremental Sheet Metal Forming

2012 ◽  
Vol 504-506 ◽  
pp. 863-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miklos Tisza ◽  
Péter Zoltán Kovács ◽  
Zsolt Lukács
Keyword(s):  
Sheet Metal ◽  
Sheet Metal Forming ◽  
Metal Forming ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Dimensional Accuracy ◽  
Forming Limit ◽  
Incremental Sheet Metal Forming

Development of new technologies and processes for small batch and prototype production of sheet metal components has a very important role in the recent years. The reason is the quick and efficient response to the market demands. For this reasons new manufacturing concepts have to be developed in order to enable a fast and reliable production of complex components and parts without investing in special forming machines. The need for flexible forming processes has been accelerated during the last 15 years, and by these developments the technology reaches new extensions. Incremental sheet metal forming (ISMF) may be regarded as one of the promising developments for these purposes. A comprehensive research work is in progress at the University of Miskolc (Hungary) to study the effect of important process parameters with particular emphasis on the shape and dimensional accuracy of the products and particularly on the formability limitations of the process. In this paper, some results concerning the determination of forming limit diagrams for single point incremental sheet metal forming will be described.

Compensations for Tool Path to Enhance Accuracy During Double Sided Incremental Forming

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Lingam ◽  
Anirban Bhattacharya ◽  
Javed Asghar ◽  
N. Venkata Reddy
Keyword(s):  
Sheet Metal ◽  
Sheet Metal Forming ◽  
Metal Forming ◽  
Tool Path ◽  
Incremental Forming ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Geometric Accuracy ◽  
Forming Process ◽  
Incremental Sheet Metal Forming

Incremental Sheet Metal Forming (ISMF) is a flexible sheet metal forming process that enables forming of complex three dimensional components by successive local deformations without using component specific tooling. ISMF is also regarded as die-less manufacturing process and in the absence of part-specific dies, geometric accuracy of formed components is inferior to that of their conventional counterparts. In Single Point Incremental Forming (SPIF), the simplest variant of ISMF, bending near component opening region is unavoidable due to lack of support. The bending in the component opening region can be reduced to a larger extent by another variant of ISMF namely Double Sided Incremental Forming (DSIF) in which a moving tool is used to support the sheet locally at the deformation zone. However the overall geometry of formed components still has unacceptable deviation from the desired geometry. Experimental observation and literature indicates that the supporting tool loses contact with the sheet after forming certain depth. Present work demonstrates a methodology to enhance geometric accuracy of formed components by compensating for tool and sheet deflection due to forming forces. Forming forces necessary to predict compensations are obtained using force equilibrium method along with thickness calculation methodology developed using overlap that occurs during forming (instead of using sine law). Results indicate that there is significant improvement in accuracy of the components produced using compensated tool paths.

Surface Roughness in Incremental Sheet Metal Forming of AA5052

2013 ◽  
Vol 753-755 ◽  
pp. 203-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
On Uma Lasunon
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Sheet Metal ◽  
Sheet Metal Forming ◽  
Feed Rate ◽  
Metal Forming ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Forming Process ◽  
Wall Angle ◽  
Incremental Sheet Metal Forming ◽  
Depth Increment

This paper presents the effect of forming parameters on the arithmetic mean surface roughness (Ra) of aluminum alloy built by a single-point incremental sheet metal forming process. Three investigated parameters are feed rate (12.5, 25 and 50 in/min), depth increment (0.015 and 0.030 in), and wall angle (45° and 60°). The results show that wall angle, depth increment and its interaction play an important role on the surface roughness, while feed rate has little effect. The optimal forming conditions for minimum surface roughness are feed rate of 25 in/min, depth increment of 0.015 in and wall angle of 45°.

Experimental study on single point incremental forming of Inconel 718

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-188
Author(s):  
S. Pratheesh Kumar ◽  
S. Elangovan ◽  
R. Mohanraj
Keyword(s):  
Sheet Metal ◽  
Process Parameters ◽  
Sheet Metal Forming ◽  
Metal Forming ◽  
Inconel 718 ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Forming Limit ◽  
Manufacturing Cost ◽  
Main Process ◽  
Incremental Sheet Metal Forming

The contemporary sheet metal industry employs forming methods that use a precise die and punch to form components with precise tolerances. In mass production, the high cost of manufacturing dies and punches is absorbed by the number of components formed, whereas this is not the case for low volume production where it increases the manufacturing cost of the products. To overcome the demand for the development of manufacturing technologies that are both agile and meet industrial requirements, an incremental sheet metal forming experiment was carried out on Inconel 718. The incremental sheet metal forming process in the research stage needs to be improved both in terms of accuracy and product quality. The main process parameters involved in the study are incremental depth, rotational speed, and feed rate of the forming tool. Based on the process parameters, experiments are conducted using the Taguchi L9 orthogonal array design and responses such as geometrical accuracy, surface roughness, and thinning are studied. The forming limit and micro-structural study allow us to understand the forming behavior of Inconel 718, which will enhance the applicability of the material.

Comparison of incremental sheet metal forming process using newly designed multipoint tool with the existing single point tool by optimization and characterization methods on austenite stainless steel 202

2021 ◽  
pp. 095440542098609
Author(s):  
Ramkumar Kathalingam ◽  
Baskar Neelakandan ◽  
Elangovan Krishnan ◽  
Sathiya Narayanan Chinnayan ◽  
Selvarajan Arangulavan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Sheet Metal ◽  
Sheet Metal Forming ◽  
Metal Forming ◽  
Incremental Forming ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Research Work ◽  
Forming Process ◽  
Wall Angle ◽  
Incremental Sheet Metal Forming

Incremental Sheet metal Forming (ISF) is a reliable process of converting a blank to work piece with better outputs compared to conventional forming process. The flexibility of ISF in producing the rapid prototype based on the customer needs is increased which is also desirable in the industry. But Single Point Incremental Forming (SPIF) process takes more time to form a product and hence the longer time is a barrier in implementing this process in industries. In this research work, the ISF process was made on sheet metal SS 202 using a newly designed multi-point tool and the obtained outputs were compared with the same material of sheet metal formed by traditionally available single point tool. This Multi Point Incremental Forming (MPIF) process takes lesser process time to give better formability, improved wall angle and good surface roughness. The input process parameters selected for the process are type of tool, speed, feed, Vertical Step Depth (VSD), and lubrication. They are arranged by using the taguchi Design of Experiments (DOE) approach. The responses considered are wall angle, formability, surface roughness, spring back and forming time. The multiple outputs obtained were optimized by Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) to predict the superior parameter. Confirmation test was also made to validate the output result. Fractography analysis was carried out to predict the fracture mechanism obtained during the forming process. The surface topography was also made on the surface of the formed area of the sheet metal. This research work concludes that newly designed MPIF outperforms SPIF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document