The Role of Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author(s):  
Claudia Marchetti ◽  
Anna Fagotti ◽  
Vincenzo Tombolini ◽  
Giovanni Scambia ◽  
Francesca De Felice
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min-Hyun Baek ◽  
Eun Young Park ◽  
Hyeong In Ha ◽  
Sang-Yoon Park ◽  
Myong Cheol Lim ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mete Güngör ◽  
Fırat Ortaç ◽  
Macit Arvas ◽  
Derin Kösebay ◽  
Murat Sönmezer ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 60 (8) ◽  
pp. 514-515
Author(s):  
Mete G??ng??or ◽  
Firat Orta?? ◽  
Macit Arvas ◽  
Derin K??osebay ◽  
Murat S??onmezer ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5501-5501 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Du Bois ◽  
Ignace Vergote ◽  
Gwenael Ferron ◽  
Alexander Reuss ◽  
Werner Meier ◽  
...  

5501 Background: The role of secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer (OC) has not been defined by level-1 evidence. Methods: Pts with OC and 1st relapse after 6+ mos platin-free interval (TFIp) were eligible if they presented with a positive AGO-score (PS ECOG 0, ascites ≤500 ml, and complete resection at initial surgery) and were randomized to 2nd-line chemotherapy alone vs cytoreductive surgery followed by chemo. Chemo regimens were selected according to the institutional standard. We report here results of the predetermined interim analysis. Results: 407pts were randomized 2010-2014. The TFIp exceeded 12 mos in 75% and 76% pts in both arms. 8.9% of 203 pts were operated despite of randomization to the no-surgery arm, whereas 6.9% of 204 pts in the surgery arm did not undergo operation. Complete resection was achieved in 67% of pts; 87% and 88% received a platinum-containing 2nd-line therapy. Median PFS was 14 mos without and 19.6 mos with surgery (HR: 0.66, 95%CI 0.52-0.83, p<0.001). Median time to start of first subsequent therapy (TFST) was 21 vs 13.9 mos in favor of the surgery arm (HR 0.61, 95%CI 0.48-0.77, p=p<0.001). PFS-2 between 1st and 2nd relapse equaled or even exceeded PFS-1 before 1strelapse in 26% after surgery and only 16% without-surgery. Analysis of the primary endpoint OS is kept blinded due to immaturity and will be evaluated after extended follow-up (the observed pooled unblinded 2-YSR was 83% instead of the initially in the protocol assumed 55-66%). 60d mortality rates were 0 and 0.5% in the surgery and no-surgery arm. Re-laparatomies were performed in 7 pts (3.5%) in the surgery arm.With the exception of myelosuppression which occurred more frequently in the no-surgery arm no further significant differences were observed with respect to grade 3+ acute adverse events. Conclusions: Surgery in pts with 1st relapse of OC after a TFIp of 6+ mos and selected by a positive AGO-Score resulted in a clinically meaningful increase of PFS and TFST with acceptable treatment burden. Until final OS data will definitively define the role of secondary cytoreductive surgery it should at least be considered as valuable option in pts with a positive AGO-Score. Clinical trial information: NCT01166737.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Ding ◽  
Dan Tang ◽  
Mingrong Xi

Abstract Objective The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness and safety of secondary cytoreductive surgery plus chemotherapy (SCS + CT) in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC). Our secondary purpose was to analyze whether patients could benefit from complete resection. Methods We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from inception to April 2021. We used appropriate scales to assess the risk of bias. Data from included studies that reported median PFS or OS were weighted by individual study sample size, and aggregated for meta-analysis. We calculated the pooled proportion of complications within 30 days after surgery. Results We identified 13 articles, including three RCTs and ten retrospective cohort studies. A total of 4572 patients were included, of which 916 patients achieved complete resection, and all patients were comparable at baseline. Compared with chemotherapy alone, SCS + CT significantly improved the PFS (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.43–0.67) and OS (HR = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44–0.81). Contrary to the results of cohort studies, the meta-analysis of RCTs showed that SCS + CT could not bring OS benefits (HR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.66–1.3). The subgroup analysis showed the prognostic importance of complete resection. Compared with chemotherapy alone, complete resection was associated with longer PFS (HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.45–0.61) and OS (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.39–0.81), while incomplete resection had no survival benefit. Additionally, complete resection could maximize survival benefit compared with incomplete resection (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.46–0.69; HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.50–0.75). The pooled proportion for complications at 30 days was 21% (95% CI: 0.12–0.30), and there was no statistical difference in chemotherapy toxicity between the two groups. Conclusion The review indicated that SCS + CT based regimens was correlated with better clinical prognosis for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer, but the interpretation of OS should be cautious. The meta-analysis emphasizes the importance of complete resection, suggesting that the potential benefits of prolonging survival may outweigh the disadvantages of any short-term complications associated with surgery.


2009 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. S129-S129
Author(s):  
D. Xaidopoulos ◽  
I. Biliatis ◽  
A. Rodolakis ◽  
Z. Voulgaris ◽  
G. Vlachos ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malika Kengsakul ◽  
Gatske M. Nieuwenhuyzen-de Boer ◽  
Suwasin Udomkarnjananun ◽  
Stephen J. Kerr ◽  
Christa D. Niehot ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document