ASO Visual Abstract: Is Medicaid Expansion Narrowing Gaps in Surgical Disparities for Low-Income Breast Cancer Patients?

Author(s):  
Samilia Obeng-Gyasi ◽  
Johnie Rose ◽  
Weichuan Dong ◽  
Uriel Kim ◽  
Siran Koroukian
2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 231-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravi K. Goyal ◽  
Stephanie B. Wheeler ◽  
Racquel E. Kohler ◽  
Kristen H. Lich ◽  
Ching-Ching Lin ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19003-e19003
Author(s):  
Leah Elson ◽  
Nadeem Bilani ◽  
Elizabeth Blessing Elimimian ◽  
Zeina A. Nahleh

e19003 Background: For socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals without insurance, expenses related to diagnosis and management of chronic conditions, such as cancer, may be too costly to afford. This contributes to diagnoses made at later stages of disease, and inadequate treatment compliance. These factors are reported to lead to unfavorable clinical outcomes and higher mortality risk, historically making uninsured/Medicaid-ineligible patients an especially vulnerable group. With recent Affordable Care Act-related Medicaid expansion, state adoption allows new access to coverage for individuals with income <138% of the federal poverty limit. Therefore, we sought to understand how Medicaid expansion has affected demographic coverage and access to care among socioeconomically disadvantaged breast cancer patients. Methods: The data presented herein was extrapolated from a 2004-2016 NCDB breast cancer population. Sociodemographic and clinical data was evaluated for a sample of Medicaid-enrolled patients, diagnosed during pre- and post-expansion years. Results: In Medicaid-expanded states, there was a significantly increased utilization of Medicaid insurance (24.3% vs. 13.2%; p<0.001), and a significant trend towards an increased proportion of Hispanic enrollment in Medicaid (21.1% vs. 11.8%; p<0.001) than in non-expanded states. In non-expanded states, there was a larger proportion of black patients (p<0.001), and patients who live further from diagnostic centers (p<0.001), in more rural areas (p<0.001), with lower education levels (p<0.001). The total study population of Medicaid-enrolled patients was n=42,217; the total comparative uninsured population was n=13,133. Medicaid-enrolled patients were observed to have more timeliness to systemic treatment following diagnosis (85.6 vs. 87.6 days; p=0.021), and were 40% less likely to be diagnosed with late-stage disease (p<0.001) than uninsured patients. Conclusions: Medicaid expansion may be associated with a less diagnosis at late stages, more timeliness to treatment, and more Hispanic coverage, which may prove to be a positive paradigm shift in cancer outcomes for underserved and underinsured groups. Several socioeconomic factors already identified as being independently associated with poor outcomes are more prevalent in the non-expanded state populations compared to the expanded states. Therefore, while benefits have been noted in patients of expanded states, many breast cancer populations still remain vulnerable in the post-expansion era.


Breast Care ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kirstin Grosse Frie ◽  
Hatouma Samoura ◽  
Samba Diop ◽  
Bakarou Kamate ◽  
Cheick Bougadari Traore ◽  
...  

Background: Breast cancer, the most common cancer among women worldwide, has a high mortality rate in low-income countries. In sub-Saharan Africa, most breast cancer patients are diagnosed with advanced disease. Some studies have quantified the time delay to diagnosis in sub-Saharan Africa, but very few have used qualitative methods to understand barriers leading to delay. This study analyses barriers throughout a breast cancer patient's pathway from symptom recognition to treatment in Mali. Method: Three focus group discussions were conducted. The model of pathways to treatment was used to structure the results into 4 time intervals: appraisal, help-seeking, diagnosis, and treatment, with a focus on barriers during each interval. Results: The main barriers during the appraisal interval were a low level of breast cancer knowledge among women, their families, and medical professionals, and during the help-seeking interval, mistrust in the community health care centers and economic hardship. Barriers during the diagnosis interval were low quality of health care services and lack of social support, and during the pretreatment interval high costs and lack of specialized services. Conclusion: Multilevel interventions are needed to ensure access, availability, and affordability of a minimum standard of care for breast cancer patients in sub-Saharan Africa.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11531-e11531
Author(s):  
Nicolas Anthony Othieno-Abinya ◽  
Peter Bird ◽  
Richard Barasa ◽  
Henry Otieno Abwao ◽  
Catherine Nyongesa ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Roberta Amparado Miziara ◽  
Jonathan Yugo Maesaka ◽  
Danielle Ramos Martin Matsumoto ◽  
Laura Penteado ◽  
Ariane Andrade dos Santos Anacleto ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The present study aims to assess the feasibility and patient satisfaction of teleoncology orientation in a vulnerable population of breast cancer patients assessed in a government health system during the coronavirus pandemic in 2020. Methods Eligible patients received an invitation to receive remote care to minimize exposure to an environment in which the risk of respiratory infection was present. The means of communication was telephone through an application that allows free conversation with no charge. An anonymous-response questionnaire based on a Likert-type scale was sent through a cell phone application or e-mail directly to each patient or close relative of the patient immediately after teleconsultation. Responses to the questions, which addressed utility, facility, interface quality, interaction quality, reliability, satisfaction, and interest in future evaluation, were compiled and analyzed. Results A total of 176 eligible patients scheduled for consultation were evaluated and 98 were included. Seventy (71.4%) successfully undertook the teleorientation. The questionnaire was submitted by 43 (61.4%) patients. The overall teleoncology orientation was classified as very positive by 41 (95.3%) patients. Specifically, regarding the questionnaire items, 43 (100%) patients scored 4 or 5 (agreed that the teleconsultation was beneficial) concerning the facility, followed by 42 (97.2%) for the interface quality, 41 (95.3%) for both utility and interaction quality, 40 (93%) for satisfaction and interest in future evaluation, and, finally, 39 (90.6%) for reliability. Conclusion Teleoncology orientation of low-income breast cancer patients is most feasible and leads to high patient satisfaction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document