The Effect of Hospital Versus Surgeon Volume on Short-Term Patient Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a SEER–Medicare Analysis

Author(s):  
Marianna V. Papageorge ◽  
Susanna W. L. de Geus ◽  
Alison P. Woods ◽  
Sing Chau Ng ◽  
David McAneny ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Kshitij Manchanda ◽  
Alice Chang ◽  
Blake Wallace ◽  
Junho Ahn ◽  
Yin Xi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 819-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge A. Padilla ◽  
Afshin A. Anoushiravani ◽  
James E. Feng ◽  
Ran Schwarzkopf ◽  
James Slover ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 608
Author(s):  
Shirin Salimi ◽  
Keval Pandya ◽  
Vinay Sastry ◽  
Claire West ◽  
Susan Virtue ◽  
...  

Advances in liver transplantation (LT) have allowed for expanded indications and increased surgical complexity. In select cases, additional surgery may be performed at time of LT rather than prior to LT due to the significant risks associated with advanced liver disease. We retrospectively studied the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent an additional planned abdominal or cardiac operation at time of LT between 2011–2019. An additional operation (LT+) was defined as a planned operation performed under the same anesthetic as the LT but not directly related to the LT. In total, 547 patients were included in the study, of which 20 underwent LT+ (4%). Additional operations included 10 gastrointestinal, 5 splenic, 3 cardiac, and 2 other abdominal operations. Baseline characteristics between LT and LT+ groups were similar. The median total operating time was significantly longer in LT+ compared to LT only (451 vs. 355 min, p = 0.002). Graft and patient survival, intraoperative blood loss, transfusion of blood products, length of hospital stay, and post-operative complications were not significantly different between groups. In carefully selected patients undergoing LT, certain additional operations performed at the same time appear to be safe with equivalent short-term outcomes and liver graft survival as those undergoing LT alone


2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (8) ◽  
pp. 654-663
Author(s):  
Gregory Glauser ◽  
Benjamin Osiemo ◽  
Stephen Goodrich ◽  
Scott D. McClintock ◽  
Kristy L. Weber ◽  
...  

Surgery ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bailey Su ◽  
Harry J. Wong ◽  
Mikhail Attaar ◽  
Kristine Kuchta ◽  
John G. Linn ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 76 (10) ◽  
pp. 1167-1171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariel J. Ourian ◽  
Yosef Nasserl ◽  
Zuri Murrell ◽  
Bruce Gewertz ◽  
David Magner ◽  
...  

Previous papers studying the effect of surgeon experience on patient outcomes after colorectal surgery are hampered by study design, variable measurements of outcome, and have shown conflicting results. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program is a validated, risk-adjusted, outcomes-based program used to measure the quality of surgical care. Here, we sought to determine the association between colorectal surgeon experience and short-term patient outcomes using a colorectal surgery-specific National Surgical Quality Improvement Program methodology. We prospectively followed 300 patients operated on by eight colorectal surgeons. The median age was 46 years, male:female ratio was 163:137, and median body mass index was 23. Surgeons were divided into two groups: those with less (Group A) than or greater (Group B) than 5 years experience. Procedures were categorized into 137 (46%) major and 163 (54%) minor cases. Group A surgeons operated on 95 (32%) patients and Group B surgeons operated on 205 (68%) patients. Postoperatively, 101 (31%) patients had complications (Group A = 29; Group B = 72). Four (1%) patients had reoperations (Group A = 0; Group B = 4) and 24 (8%) were readmitted (Group A = 5; Group B = 19) within 30 days of surgery. This prospective study revealed no significant difference in short-term outcomes between colorectal surgeons with less than versus more than 5 years experience.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document