scholarly journals Detoxification Mechanism of α,β-Unsaturated Carbonyl Compounds in Cigarette Smoke Observed in Sheep Erythrocytes

2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (7) ◽  
pp. 721-726
Author(s):  
Shizuyo Horiyama ◽  
Mayuko Hatai ◽  
Atsushi Ichikawa ◽  
Noriko Yoshikawa ◽  
Kazuki Nakamura ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
S Moldoveanu ◽  
W Coleman ◽  
J Wilkins

AbstractThis paper presents the findings on a quantitative evaluation of carbonyl levels in exhaled cigarette smoke from human subjects. The cigarettes evaluated include products with 5.0 mg ‘tar’, 10.6 mg ‘tar’ and 16.2 mg ‘tar’, where ‘tar’ is defined as the weight of total wet particulate matter (TPM) minus the weight of nicotine and water, and the cigarettes are smoked following U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) recommendations. The measured levels of carbonyls in the exhaled smoke were compared with calculated yields of carbonyls in the inhaled smoke and a retention efficiency was obtained. The number of human subjects included a total of ten smokers for the 10.6 mg ‘tar’, five for the 16.2 mg ‘tar’, and five for the 5.0 mg ‘tar’ product, each subject smoking three cigarettes. The analyzed carbonyl compounds included several aldehydes (formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, acrolein, propionaldehyde, crotonaldehyde and n-butyraldehyde), and two ketones (acetone and 2-butanone). The smoke collection from the human subjects was vacuum assisted. Exhaled smoke was collected on Cambridge pads pretreated with a solution of dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) followed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of the dinitrophenylhydrazones of the carbonyl compounds. The cigarette butts from the smokers were collected and analyzed for nicotine. The nicotine levels for the cigarette butts from the smokers were used to calculate the level of carbonyls in the inhaled smoke, based on calibration curves. These were generated separately by analyzing the carbonyls in smoke and the nicotine in the cigarette butts obtained by machine smoking under different puffing regimes. The comparison of the level of carbonyl compounds in exhaled smoke with that from the inhaled smoke showed high retention of all the carbonyls. The retention of aldehydes was above 95% for all three different ‘tar’ levels cigarettes. The ketones were retained with a slightly lower efficiency. Acetone was retained in the range of 90% to 95%. The retention for 2-butanone showed a larger scatter compared to other results but it also appeared to be slightly less absorbed than the aldehydes, with an average retention around 95%. The retention of acetaldehyde and acetone by human smokers was previously reported in literature and the findings from this study are in very good agreement with these result.


Author(s):  
H.P. Stauffer ◽  
J. Bourquin

AbstractThe quantitative determination of formaldehyde in the gas phase of cigarette smoke does not permit any conclusion about the actual level in whole smoke. This is due to the fact that a Cambridge filter charged with smoke condensate absorbs up to 50 % of the volatile aldehydes from the gas phase. A simple method is presented making possible the estimation of formaldehyde in whole cigarette smoke. The procedure is based on the Hantzsch reaction between formaldehyde, acetylacetone and ammonium ion in an aqueous buffer solution. The reaction product, 3,5-diacetyl1,4-dihydrolutidine, has an absorption maximum at 412 nm and is measured spectrophotometrically. The operations are simple and there are no separation steps required. Reproducibility is excellent and interference by other carbonyl compounds can be neglected. Acetaldehyde in concentrations 10 times higher than formaldehyde interferes to less than 1 %. Different types of cigarettes have been analysed with respect to their delivery of formaldehyde. Values found range from 40 to 90 µg per cigarette. The concentrations found in whole smoke are significantly higher than the values cited in the Iiterature for gas phase formaldehyde


2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. 621-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard R. Baker

2005 ◽  
Vol 62 (11-12) ◽  
pp. 631-636 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. L. Wang ◽  
H. W. Tong ◽  
X. Y. Yan ◽  
L. Q. Sheng ◽  
J. Yang ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 509 (4) ◽  
pp. 988-993 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tsunehito Higashi ◽  
Enas Elmeligy ◽  
Yosuke Mai ◽  
Yoichi Noya ◽  
Koji Terada ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Md. Ekhlasur Rahaman ◽  
Rayhan Habib Jibon ◽  
Md. Bellal Hossain ◽  
Himadri Shekhar Mondal ◽  
Abdullah Al-Mamun Bulbul ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document