scholarly journals Associations Between Physical Fitness Test Scores And Tibial Bone Microarchitecture In Young Adults Entering Military Training

2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (8S) ◽  
pp. 127-127
Author(s):  
Katelyn I. Guerriere ◽  
Julie M. Hughes ◽  
Soothesuk Kusumpa ◽  
Leila A. Walker ◽  
Mellisa D. Richardson ◽  
...  
2005 ◽  
Vol 37 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S99
Author(s):  
Sarah B. Jones ◽  
J. J. Knapik ◽  
M. A. Sharp ◽  
S. Darakjy ◽  
K. G. Hauret ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-48
Author(s):  
신승환 ◽  
Jun,Tae-Won ◽  
박재영 ◽  
우재홍 ◽  
박익렬

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (7S) ◽  
pp. 373-373
Author(s):  
Jason A. Melnyk ◽  
Cassandra York ◽  
Michael Voight

2002 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marieke J.G. van Heuvelen ◽  
Martin Stevens ◽  
Gertrudis I.J.M. Kempen

This study investigated differences in physical-fitness test scores between actively and passively recruited older adults and the consequences thereof for norm-based classification of individuals. Walking endurance, grip strength, hip flexibility, balance, manual dexterity, and reaction time were measured in participants age 57 years or older: 1 sample recruited through media announcements (passively recruited) and 1 sample recruited through personal contact (actively recruited). Classifications on a 5-point scale based on norms were cross-tabulated. Compared with the actively recruited sample, performance of the passively recruited sample was significantly better on all tests except, for women, hip flexibility and manual dexterity. Cross-tabulation of the 2 classifications showed that percentages of agreement varied from 27.4% to 87.4%. Cohen's Kappa varied from .11 to .84. Caution should be used when giving feedback on test performance and subsequently making physical activity recommendations if norms are based on the performance of passively recruited older adults.


2007 ◽  
Vol 172 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah B. Jones ◽  
Joseph J. Knapik ◽  
Marilyn A. Sharp ◽  
Salima Darakjy ◽  
Bruce H. Jones

2019 ◽  
Vol 184 (9-10) ◽  
pp. e426-e430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pantelis T Nikolaidis ◽  
Konstantinos-Georgios Papaioannou ◽  
Thomas Rosemann ◽  
Beat Knechtle

Abstract Introduction Strength training has been routinely used in exercise programs of military groups; however, no review has been ever conducted to clarify the selection of exercise tests to monitor its effectiveness. Therefore, the aim of the present review was to critically evaluate the current practices in the choice of assessment methods for muscle strength in military and suggest directions for future research. Methods The Scopus and Pubmed databases were searched in December 2018 using “fitness assessment OR muscle strength AND military OR army” as keywords. Results Methodological concerns were highlighted in exercise testing of muscle strength, where the use of appropriate tests were recommended (handgrip, isokinetic or 1RM in bench or leg press) to complement tests that measured muscle endurance rather than muscle strength (e.g., timed push-ups or sit-ups). Conclusions Although strength training has been included in military training, it was concluded that the existed physical fitness test batteries focused mostly on muscle endurance rather than on muscle strength. Therefore, it would be suggested that muscle strength tests be included in future physical fitness test batteries in order to evaluate effectively the content of military training.


2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (7S) ◽  
pp. 372-373
Author(s):  
Andrew Tyler Inman ◽  
Sarah Ferreira ◽  
Andrew Plucker ◽  
Nicholas H. Gist ◽  
Diana Thomas

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document