scholarly journals Exercise Testing of Muscle Strength in Military

2019 ◽  
Vol 184 (9-10) ◽  
pp. e426-e430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pantelis T Nikolaidis ◽  
Konstantinos-Georgios Papaioannou ◽  
Thomas Rosemann ◽  
Beat Knechtle

Abstract Introduction Strength training has been routinely used in exercise programs of military groups; however, no review has been ever conducted to clarify the selection of exercise tests to monitor its effectiveness. Therefore, the aim of the present review was to critically evaluate the current practices in the choice of assessment methods for muscle strength in military and suggest directions for future research. Methods The Scopus and Pubmed databases were searched in December 2018 using “fitness assessment OR muscle strength AND military OR army” as keywords. Results Methodological concerns were highlighted in exercise testing of muscle strength, where the use of appropriate tests were recommended (handgrip, isokinetic or 1RM in bench or leg press) to complement tests that measured muscle endurance rather than muscle strength (e.g., timed push-ups or sit-ups). Conclusions Although strength training has been included in military training, it was concluded that the existed physical fitness test batteries focused mostly on muscle endurance rather than on muscle strength. Therefore, it would be suggested that muscle strength tests be included in future physical fitness test batteries in order to evaluate effectively the content of military training.

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 356-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis X. Short ◽  
Joseph P. Winnick

This manuscript examines the validity and reliability of the tests used to measure body composition in the Brockport Physical Fitness Test. More specifically, information is provided on skinfold measures and body mass index and their applicability to youngsters with mental retardation and mild limitations in fitness, visual impairment (blindness), cerebral palsy, spinal cord injury, or congenital anomalies or amputations. The rationale for criterion-referenced standards for these test items for youngsters with these disabilities is provided along with some data on attainability of those standards. Possible ideas for future research are recommended.


2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis X. Short ◽  
Joseph P. Winnick

This manuscript provides information on the test items and standards used to assess flexibility and range of motion in the Brockport Physical Fitness Test. Validity, attainability, and reliability of the back saver sit and reach, the shoulder stretch, the modified Apley test, the modified Thomas test, and the Target Stretch Test are discussed. Particular attention is paid to the utility of these tests for youngsters with mental retardation and mild limitations in fitness, visual impairments (blindness), cerebral palsy, spinal cord injury, or congenital anomalies or amputations. Suggestions for future research are provided.


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-48
Author(s):  
신승환 ◽  
Jun,Tae-Won ◽  
박재영 ◽  
우재홍 ◽  
박익렬

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis X. Short ◽  
Joseph P. Winnick

This article describes the procedures and rationale for the selection of test items and criterion-referenced standards associated with the aerobic functioning component of the Brockport Physical Fitness Test. Validity and reliability information is provided for the 1-mile run/walk, the PACER (16-m and 20-m), and the Target Aerobic Movement Test. The relevance of these test items and standards for youngsters with mental retardation and mild limitations in fitness, visual impairments (blindness), cerebral palsy, and spinal cord injuries, and for those with congenital anomalies or amputations is highlighted. Information on the attainability of the selected standards also is provided. Possible topics for future research are suggested.


2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (8S) ◽  
pp. 127-127
Author(s):  
Katelyn I. Guerriere ◽  
Julie M. Hughes ◽  
Soothesuk Kusumpa ◽  
Leila A. Walker ◽  
Mellisa D. Richardson ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francis X. Short ◽  
Joseph P. Winnick

This manuscript provides information on the rationale for the selection of the muscular strength and endurance test items associated with the Brockport Physical Fitness Test for youngsters with mental retardation and mild limitations in fitness, visual impairment (blindness), cerebral palsy, spinal cord injury, or congenital anomalies or amputations. Information on the validity, attainability, and reliability of the 16 tests and their criterion-referenced standards is provided. Suggestions are made for future research.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document