scholarly journals Predictive Performance of SYNTAX Score II in Patients With Left Main and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

2014 ◽  
Vol 78 (8) ◽  
pp. 1942-1949 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos M. Campos ◽  
David van Klaveren ◽  
Javaid Iqbal ◽  
Yoshinobu Onuma ◽  
Yao-Jun Zhang ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Rui Zhang ◽  
Chenxi Song ◽  
Changdong Guan ◽  
Qianqian Liu ◽  
Chunyue Wang ◽  
...  

Background: The potential impact of quantitative flow ratio (QFR) based functional Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score (FSS QFR ) on prognostication and revascularization strategy choice has not been fully investigated, and the discriminant ability of FSS QFR needs further validation. Methods: QFR was retrospectively analyzed in left main or patients with multivessel coronary artery disease from the PANDA III trial. A total of 607 patients with analyzable QFR in all vessels were included. FSS QFR was counted by summing the individual scores only in ischemia-producing lesions (vessel QFR ≤0.8). Patients were stratified according to tertiles of SYNTAX score (SS), and 3 groups of FSS were divided by the same cutoff score. The primary end point was 2-year major adverse cardiac events (a composite of cardiac death, any myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization). Results: After calculating the FSS QFR , 16% (96/607) of study patients moved from higher-risk group by SS to lower-risk group. In the low, intermediate, and high FSS QFR group, the cumulative incidence of 2-year major adverse cardiac events was 9.1%, 13.5%, and 22.3% ( P =0.0004), and the rate of a composite of cardiac death or myocardial infarction (3.8%, 7.3%, and 13.7%, P =0.0006) was also increased. Compared with SS, FSS QFR significantly improved risk classification and prognostication (area under the curve of the receiver-operating characteristics 0.65 versus 0.62, P =0.0009). Moreover, 6% (38/607) of patients, for whom coronary artery bypass grafting would be recommended according to SS, converted to favor percutaneous coronary intervention after FSS QFR calculation. After multivariate adjustment, FSS QFR was an independent predictor of 2-year major adverse cardiac events (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.02–1.07]; P =0.0001). Conclusions: Among patients with left main or multivessel coronary artery disease, FSS QFR showed applicability in prognostication and revascularization strategy choice. An improved scoring system combining anatomy and physiology (FSS QFR ) discriminated the risk of adverse events modestly better than anatomic assessment (SS) alone. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02017275. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.


This case focuses on the use of cardiac stents vs. coronary artery bypass surgery for severe coronary artery disease by asking the question: Should patients with severe coronary artery disease (three-vessel and/or left main disease) be treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)? For patients with three-vessel and/or left main coronary artery disease, CABG reduced rates of major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events compared with PCI. This difference was largely driven by a reduction in the need for repeat revascularization procedures among patients receiving CABG. Patients who received PCI had a lower rate of stroke, however, which may make PCI an attractive option for some patients. In addition, the authors suggest that patients with less complex coronary artery disease (as assessed using the SYNTAX score) may be particularly good candidates for PCI, but this hypothesis requires further validation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 122 (12) ◽  
pp. 2005-2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Choongki Kim ◽  
Sung-Jin Hong ◽  
Chul-Min Ahn ◽  
Jung-Sun Kim ◽  
Byeong-Keuk Kim ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document