scholarly journals A Novel Extracorporeal Continuous-Flow Ventricular Assist System for Patients With Advanced Heart Failure ― Initial Clinical Experience ―

2020 ◽  
Vol 84 (7) ◽  
pp. 1090-1096
Author(s):  
Osamu Seguchi ◽  
Tomoyuki Fujita ◽  
Nana Kitahata ◽  
Keiichiro Iwasaki ◽  
Kensuke Kuroda ◽  
...  
Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Salpy V Pamboukian ◽  
Roberta C Bogaev ◽  
Stuart D Russell ◽  
Andrew J Boyle ◽  
Nader Moazami ◽  
...  

Small continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) are providing new options for women in advanced heart failure who due to body size limitations were historically excluded from use of large first generation pulsatile devices. We report the experience of women one year after implantation with the new, HeartMate II continuous flow LVAD for bridge to transplantation. Patients (n=279), 24% female (F), 76% male (M) in NYHA Class IV heart failure, LV ejection fraction 16±7% (F), 16±6% (M), mostly inotrope dependent and about half on intraaortic balloon pump support (50% F, 43% M), who had been enrolled in the HM II clinical trial for at least 1 year as a bridge to cardiac transplantation at 33 centers were analyzed. Outcomes and causes of death in the first year of support between F and M recipients were determined. The percentage of patients who had undergone transplantation, recovery of the heart with device removal, or continued on HM II support after one year were the same (80%) between M and F. However, the percentage of patients who had received a heart transplant was significantly less for F (38%) than M (53%) (p<0.05). Median duration of support for F was 226 days (range 8–1004) vs. 143 days (range 0–1057) for M. Mortality on device support was 20% for F and 18% M. There were no statistically significant differences in leading causes of death: sepsis (1.5% F vs 4.2% M), ischemic stroke (3.1% F vs 1.9% M), hemorrhagic stroke (3.1% F vs 1.4% M), and right heart failure (3.1% F vs 1.9% M). Of 82 patients continuing on support at 1 year, 26 (32%) were F with median BSA of 1.65 vs 2.14 m 2 for M. Kaplan Meier survival at one year was similar for females (74%) and males (76%). The smaller, more durable HM II rotary LVAD may be especially advantageous to women with advanced HF as a bridge to cardiac transplantation, because of significantly smaller BSA and need for extended duration of mechanical support due to longer wait times for suitable organ donors. Outcomes at one-year


ESC CardioMed ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. 1884-1889
Author(s):  
Emer Joyce ◽  
Randall C Starling

Over 30,000 ventricular assist devices (VADs) have been implanted worldwide in the past decade. Continuous-flow VAD therapy has realized greater durability and improved survival. Both axial and centrifugal flow devices are approved for the treatment of chronic and refractory advanced heart failure. Patients waiting for transplants that are ‘bridged’ and transplant-ineligible patients (destination therapy), receive VAD therapy. One-year survival rates are now approximately 80% and 70% at 2 years. The advent of continuous-flow VADs replaced volume displacement pulsatile VADs and numerous adverse events related to lack of circulatory pulsatility became recognized and prevalent as VAD therapy proliferated. Common adverse events include driveline infection, device infection, haemorrhagic and embolic stroke, bleeding, aortic insufficiency, and VAD thrombosis. Current VAD therapy requires systemic anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy. A lack of donor hearts has resulted in prolonged and frequent VAD therapy in transplant candidates. Careful selection of VAD candidates is imperative and requires careful risk stratification. New VAD models with technological advances will enhance patient acceptance of VAD therapy and lead to further expansion in advanced heart failure patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document