scholarly journals Who Is (More) Rational?

2014 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
pp. 1518-1550 ◽  
Author(s):  
Syngjoo Choi ◽  
Shachar Kariv ◽  
Wieland Müller ◽  
Dan Silverman
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Utility Maximization ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Revealed Preference ◽  
Household Wealth ◽  
Standard Deviation Increase ◽  
Socioeconomic Groups ◽  
Preference Theory ◽  
Scale Experiment ◽  
Revealed Preference Theory

Revealed preference theory offers a criterion for decision-making quality: if decisions are high quality then there exists a utility function the choices maximize. We conduct a large-scale experiment to test for consistency with utility maximization. Consistency scores vary markedly within and across socioeconomic groups. In particular, consistency is strongly related to wealth: A standard deviation increase in consistency is associated with 15–19 percent more household wealth. This association is quantitatively robust to conditioning on correlates of unobserved constraints, preferences, and beliefs. Consistency with utility maximization under laboratory conditions thus captures decision-making ability that applies across domains and influences important real-world outcomes. (JEL D12, D14, D81, D83, D91, G11)

Revealed preference, belief, and game theory

2000 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Hausman
Keyword(s):  
Game Theory ◽  
Revealed Preference ◽  
Preference Theory ◽  
Revealed Preference Theory ◽  
Subjective States

The notion of ‘revealed preference’ is unclear and should be abandoned. Defenders of the theory of revealed preference have misinterpreted legitimate concerns about the testability of economics as the demand that economists eschew reference to (unobservable) subjective states. As attempts to apply revealed-preference theory to game theory illustrate with particular vividness, this demand is mistaken.

scholarly journals Fooled by facts: quantifying anchoring bias through a large-scale experiment

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taha Yasseri ◽  
Jannie Reher
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Field Experiment ◽  
Empirical Evidence ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Complex Relationship ◽  
Great Care ◽  
The Future ◽  
Anchoring Bias ◽  
Scale Experiment

AbstractThrough a large-scale online field experiment, we provide new empirical evidence for the presence of the anchoring bias in people’s judgement due to irrational reliance on a piece of information that they are initially given. The comparison of the anchoring stimuli and respective responses across different tasks reveals a positive, yet complex relationship between the anchors and the bias in participants’ predictions of the outcomes of events in the future. Participants in the treatment group were equally susceptible to the anchors regardless of their level of engagement, previous performance, or gender. Given the strong and ubiquitous influence of anchors quantified here, we should take great care to closely monitor and regulate the distribution of information online to facilitate less biased decision making.

scholarly journals Understanding Attitudes towards Proenvironmental Travel: An Empirical Study from Tangshan City in China

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoping Fang ◽  
Yajing Xu ◽  
Weiya Chen
Keyword(s):  
Travel Behavior ◽  
Mode Choice ◽  
Revealed Preference ◽  
Individual Characteristics ◽  
Survey Method ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Travel Mode ◽  
Preference Theory ◽  
Travel Mode Choice ◽  
Revealed Preference Theory

Understanding people’s attitudes towards proenvironmental travel will help to encourage people to adopt proenvironmental travel behavior. Revealed preference theory assumes that the consumption preference of consumers can be revealed by their consumption behavior. In order to investigate the influences on citizens’ travel decision and analyze the difficulties of promoting proenvironmental travel behavior in medium-sized cities in China, based on revealed preference theory, this paper uses the RP survey method and disaggregate model to analyze how individual characteristics, situational factors, and trip features influence the travel mode choice. The field investigation was conducted in Tangshan City to obtain the RP data. An MNL model was built to deal with the travel mode choice. SPSS software was used to calibrate the model parameters. The goodness-of-fit tests and the predicted outcome demonstrate the validation of the parameter setting. The results show that gender, occupation, trip purpose, and distance have an obvious influence on the travel mode choice. In particular, the male gender, high income, and business travel show a high correlation with carbon-intensive travel, while the female gender and a medium income scored higher in terms of proenvironmental travel modes, such as walking, cycling, and public transport.

scholarly journals New Developments in Revealed Preference Theory: Decisions Under Risk, Uncertainty, and Intertemporal Choice

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 299-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Federico Echenique
Keyword(s):  
Expected Utility ◽  
Intertemporal Choice ◽  
Revealed Preference ◽  
New Developments ◽  
Preference Theory ◽  
Decisions Under Risk ◽  
Discounted Utility ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Functional Forms ◽  
Revealed Preference Theory

This article reviews recent developments in revealed preference theory. It discusses the testable implications of theories of choice that are germane to specific economic environments. The focus is on expected utility in risky environments, subjected expected utility and maxmin expected utility in the presence of uncertainty, and exponentially discounted utility for intertemporal choice. The testable implications of these theories for data on choice from classical linear budget sets are described and shown to follow a common thread. The theories all imply an inverse relation between prices and quantities, with different qualifications depending on the functional forms in the theory under consideration.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document