Patient Preferences for Single Rooms or Shared Accommodation in a District General Hospital

2009 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
L Florey ◽  
R Flynn ◽  
C Isles

Objectives To determine whether patients who have used a Scottish district general hospital would prefer single or shared accommodation on a future admission. Methods We surveyed 80 in-patients in January 2008 in order to obtain 20 medical and 20 surgical patients in single rooms and the same number in shared accommodation. Each patient received a seven point questionnaire that had been validated in another centre. Results Forty four men and 36 women, median 64 years, who had been in hospital for a median of 4.5 days (range 1 to 53 days) participated in the survey. Seventy per cent of patients in shared and 40% of patients in single rooms said they would prefer shared accommodation during a future hospital admission. Those expressing a preference for shared accommodation were older (median age 68 versus 58 years) and had been in hospital for longer (median 5.5 versus 3.5 days) than those who said they would prefer a single room. Conclusions It is likely that the desire for company among older people who have to spend a week or more in hospital is driving the responses we obtained. Our findings do not support claims that the argument in favour of 100% single rooms is ‘overwhelming’.

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. e608-e614
Author(s):  
Ruth de Las Casas ◽  
Catherine Meilak ◽  
Anna Whittle ◽  
Judith Partridge ◽  
Jacek Adamek ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayan George ◽  
Alok Mathew ◽  
Edward Robinson ◽  
Edward Botsford ◽  
Rohan Ardley ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims 1. Understand the confidence levels in caring for general surgical patients of current foundation year one (FY1) doctors in who have had foundation interim year one (FiY1) post in a tertiary centre (TC) and a district general hospital (DGH). 2. Determine whether there is a difference in the experience of the FiY1 post in a TC or DGH. Methods FY1s doctors were surveyed throughout August – December 2020. Nine questions used Likert scales (1 to 5: not at all confident to very confident) over some common general surgical themes. Data was initially inputted using Google Docs and analysed in Microsoft Excel. Results 20% (6/30) from a DGH and 80% (24/30) from a TC Confidence levels were higher for FY1s who had a FiY1 post in a TC as opposed to a DGH in dealing with acute general surgical patients, appendicitis and scrubbing in theatre. Confidence levels were the same in both a TC and DGH for FY1s in managing those with hepatobiliary disease, prescribing fluids for resuscitation and maintenance as well as speaking to a family when a patient is dying and speaking to a patient when their diagnosis is unknown. Conclusions FY1s who had a FiY1 post in a TC had better confidence levels in more areas as opposed to a DGH. The experience of the FiY1 post should be more standardised to ensure the growth of confidence across all areas identified in the survey.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayan George ◽  
Alok Mathew ◽  
Edward Robinson ◽  
Rohan Ardley

Abstract Aims 1. Understand the confidence levels of current foundation year one (FY1) doctors. 2. Understand whether an interim foundation year one (FiY1) post improves confidence. Methods FY1s were surveyed throughout August – December 2020. Six questions used Likert scales (1 to 5: not at all confident to very confident) over some common palliative themes. Data was initially inputted using Google Docs and analysed in Microsoft Excel. Results 28.6% (8/28) of FY1s completed the survey. 50% (4/8) did not undertake a FiY1 50% (4/8). Confidence levels were higher for FY1s who did have a FiY1 post compared to those that did not in managing pain control, psychological distress, spiritual health, social issues, speaking to family and the patient in the last days of life. Conclusions FY1s who had a FiY1 post had greater confidence levels than those that did not in a district general hospital. This data suggest the value of the FiY1 post however work needs to be done to improve the experience to the role.


Anaesthesia ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 59 (10) ◽  
pp. 967-970 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Badiger ◽  
M. Green ◽  
H. Hackwood ◽  
C. Palin ◽  
C. D. Shee

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (9) ◽  
pp. e20.1-e20
Author(s):  
Rebecca Le Maistre

AimPatients are more likely to experience a ‘medicines-related safety incident’ when medicines reconciliation happens more than 24 hours after admission to an acute setting,1 according to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). The study aimed to assess the impact on medicine reconciliations following the introduction of a dedicated Paediatric Medicines Management Pharmacy Technician to the paediatric wards at a District General Hospital (DGH).MethodsData has been routinely collected by the pharmacy department over of a number of years showing the time of medicines reconciliations compared with the time of hospital admission. This data shows the number of medicine reconciliations that were completed within 24 hours of hospital admission and the number that were not completed within 24 hours. The data is routinely collected on the Thursday of the first full week of every month. All patients that were admitted to the paediatric wards were included in this data. The service is only funded Monday to Friday through the Child Health Department of the DGH. This data excludes neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Data was collected from 83 paediatric patients in March/April/May 2017 and 78 paediatric patients in March/April/May 2019.ResultsData collected for the paediatric patients over March/April/May 2017 showed that around 21.7% of all paediatric patients admitted to the wards had a completed medicines reconciliation within 24 hours. The data collected over the same period in 2019 showed that 85% paediatric patients admitted to the wards had a completed medicines reconciliation within 24 hours.ConclusionThis study was useful in demonstrating the effectiveness of introducing a dedicated Paediatric Medicine Management Pharmacy Technician to the paediatric wards in a DGH. It showed that the proportion of medicine reconciliations within 24 hours prior to the change was very low, but after the change it was very high with nearly all patients having a completed medicines reconciliation within 24 hours. Prior to the introduction of a dedicated Paediatric Medicines Management Pharmacy Technician, the paediatric wards at this DGH were not meeting the standards set by NICE regarding medicines reconciliations within 24 hours of being admitted to an acute setting. After the introduction the paediatric wards were meeting these standards. By meeting NICE guideline QS120 Medicines Optimisation, the DGH has reduced the likelihood of medicines-related safety incidents. With the introduction of a dedicated Paediatric Medicines Management Pharmacy Technician there have been many other benefits. These include counselling to parents/children on the use of their medicines; checking of patients’ own medicines to see if they are still fit for purpose; advice to parents about unlicensed medicines and why they are used; where to obtain further supplies when new medicines have been started; and assisting parents and GP surgeries with any supply issues.ReferenceNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Medicines Optimisation (internet). (London):NICE; March 2016.(Quality Standard [QS120]). Available from www.nice.org.uk/guidance/qs120//chapter/Quality-statement-4-Medicines-reconciliation-in-acute-settings


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document