Monte Carlo simulations of occupational radiation doses in interventional radiology

2007 ◽  
Vol 80 (954) ◽  
pp. 460-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Siiskonen ◽  
M Tapiovaara ◽  
A Kosunen ◽  
M Lehtinen ◽  
E Vartiainen
2020 ◽  
Vol 78 ◽  
pp. 58-70
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Abdelrahman ◽  
Pasquale Lombardo ◽  
Anna Camp ◽  
Maria A. Duch ◽  
Christophe Phillips ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 84 (997) ◽  
pp. 70-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
E P Efstathopoulos ◽  
I Pantos ◽  
M Andreou ◽  
A Gkatzis ◽  
E Carinou ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
A Almén ◽  
M Andersson ◽  
U O’Connor ◽  
M Abdelrahman ◽  
A Camp ◽  
...  

Abstract Exposure levels to staff in interventional radiology (IR) may be significant and appropriate assessment of radiation doses is needed. Issues regarding measurements using physical dosemeters in the clinical environment still exist. The objective of this work was to explore the prerequisites for assessing staff radiation dose, based on simulations only. Personal dose equivalent, Hp(10), was assessed using simulations based on Monte Carlo methods. The position of the operator was defined using a 3D motion tracking system. X-ray system exposure parameters were extracted from the x-ray equipment. The methodology was investigated and the simulations compared to measurements during IR procedures. The results indicate that the differences between simulated and measured staff radiation doses, in terms of the personal dose equivalent quantity Hp(10), are in the order of 30–70 %. The results are promising but some issues remain to be solved, e.g. an automated tracking of movable parts such as the ceiling-mounted protection shield.


2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (11) ◽  
pp. 1216-1222 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Koukorava ◽  
E. Carinou ◽  
P. Ferrari ◽  
S. Krim ◽  
L. Struelens

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 148-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuta Matsunaga ◽  
Ai Kawaguchi ◽  
Masanao Kobayashi ◽  
Shigetaka Suzuki ◽  
Shoichi Suzuki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document