scholarly journals Three-dimensional imaging methods to quantify soft and hard tissues change after cleft-related treatment during growth in patients with cleft lip and/or cleft palate: a systematic review

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (2) ◽  
pp. 20180084 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bennaree Awarun ◽  
Jorden Blok ◽  
Ruben Pauwels ◽  
Constantinus Politis ◽  
Reinhilde Jacobs
2014 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 623-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Okan Akcam ◽  
Halise Aydemir ◽  
Levent Özer ◽  
Berna Özel ◽  
T. Ufuk Toygar-Memikoğlu

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (9) ◽  
pp. 773-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kachin Wattanawong ◽  
Sasivimol Rattanasiri ◽  
Mark McEvoy ◽  
John Attia ◽  
Ammarin Thakkinstian

2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562110398
Author(s):  
Hope Sparks Lancaster ◽  
Kari M. Lien ◽  
Jordan Haas ◽  
Paige Ellis ◽  
Nancy J. Scherer

Objective We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review of literature comparing pre-reading and general reading in school-age children with nonsyndromic cleft palate with or without cleft lip (NSCP/L) to their peers without NSCP/L. Methods Our literature search identified 1238 possible records. After screening we identified 11 samples for inclusion for systematic review and eight for meta-analysis. We compared 292 children with NSCP/L to 311 peers for 23 pre-reading effect sizes and 17 general reading effect sizes (EFg). We conducted a random-effects metaregression using robust variance estimation. Results On average school-age children with NSCP/L scored lower on pre-reading (EFg = −0.36) and general reading measures (EFg = −0.38) compared to their peers. We conducted post-hoc analyses on phonological awareness and word decoding effect sizes; children with NSCP/L performed lower on phonological awareness (EFg = −0.22) and word decoding (EFg = −0.39) compared to their peers. There was weak evidence that hearing status and/or speech-language functioning might moderate reading development. There was limited evidence that age or socioeconomic status moderated reading development. However, samples did not consistently report several characteristics that were coded for this project. Conclusions Our findings suggest that school-age children with NSCP/L have persistent reading problems. Further research is needed to explore reading development in children with NSCP/L, as well as the relationships among hearing, speech, language, and reading development.


2021 ◽  
pp. 105566562110512
Author(s):  
Cameron Penny ◽  
Connor McGuire ◽  
Michael Bezuhly

Objective Various devices and techniques have been proposed to reduce feeding difficulties experienced by infants with cleft palate. The aim of this review is to identify and assess the scope and quality of evidence for these interventions. Methods A systematic review of published literature evaluating feeding interventions for infants with cleft palate (with or without cleft lip) from database inception to 2021 was conducted using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews guidelines. Quality appraisal of included studies was conducted using a methodological index for nonrandomized studies, Cochrane, or a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews 2 instruments, according to study type. Results Fourteen studies met inclusion criteria, with the majority (71%) of studies consisting of second-level evidence. Included interventions were specialty bottles (21%), alternative feeding delivery systems (14%), obturators (14%), and educational programs (14%). Specialty bottles and palatal obturators did not appear to offer any substantial growth advantages compared to traditional bottles or no intervention, respectively. Designated education programs for the mothers of infants with clefts had a positive impact on infant growth. Conclusions Overall evidence evaluating feeding interventions for infants with cleft palate was moderate to low. While it does not appear that specialized feeding delivery systems or palatal obturators significantly improve growth in infants with clefts compared to children without cleft conditions, education programs do appear to be beneficial.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-28
Author(s):  
Rachel L. Kremer ◽  
Madison E. Wolfe ◽  
Noah J. Brueckner ◽  
Michaela C. Viola ◽  
Mary Insana Fisher

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document