A 4-Month-Old Girl with Persistent Respiratory Distress and Multiple Admissions to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Due to a Congenital Bronchogenic Cyst

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alzahra Y. Alradhi ◽  
Abdullah Al-Shamarni ◽  
Abdullah Yousef
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chih-Ching Chang ◽  
Yi-Chen Lin ◽  
Tzu-Chun Chen ◽  
Jainn-Jim Lin ◽  
Shao-Hsuan Hsia ◽  
...  

Aim: High-flow nasal cannulas (HFNCs) show potential in the application of positive pressure, improving gas exchange, and decreasing work of breathing in patients with acute respiratory distress. The aims of this study were to elucidate the indications for HFNC therapy in children of all ages and diagnoses, and to evaluate the efficacy and risk factors for failure of HFNC therapy in children with acute respiratory distress with hypoxia in a pediatric intensive care unit.Methods: We conducted this retrospective cohort study at a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2020. All children, from 1 month to 18 years of age, with acute respiratory distress with hypoxia and HFNC therapy were eligible. The clinical data were reviewed.Results: One hundred and two children met the eligibility criteria for the study, of whom 57 (55.9%) were male, and the mean age was 7.00 ± 6.79 years. Seventy-eight (76.5%) of the children had underlying disorders. The most common indications for the use of HFNC therapy were pneumonia (40, 39.2%), sepsis-related respiratory distress (17, 16.7%), and bronchiolitis (16, 15.7%). The failure rate was 15.7% (16 of 102 children). Higher initial and maximum fraction of inspiration O2 levels and lower initial and lowest SpO2/FiO2 (S/F) ratio were early and possible signs of failure requiring escalation of respiratory support.Conclusion: In our population, we found that HFNC therapy could be initiated as the first-line therapy for various etiologies of acute respiratory distress with hypoxia in a pediatric intensive care unit and for all age groups.


Author(s):  
Mihir Sarkar ◽  
Manas Kumar Mahapatra ◽  
Sanajit Ghosh ◽  
Satyabrata Roy Chowdhoury ◽  
Maha Ashraf Kazi ◽  
...  

AbstractThis study aimed to assess different clinical, disease severity, laboratory, treatment, and outcome-related factors of COVID-19 positive infants admitted to a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) and to compare these parameters with COVID-19 positive noninfants (1–12 years of age) who also required intensive care admission. This retrospective observational study was conducted in a PICU of a tertiary care, dedicated pediatric COVID facility. The clinical, epidemiological, laboratory parameters, and treatment outcomes of COVID-19 infected infants admitted to the PICU were recorded and analyzed. During comparison with the noninfant group, malignancy and coinfection with dengue and scrub typhus were excluded from both groups. A total 313 COVID-19 positive children aged from 1 month to 12 years old were admitted, of which 115 (36.7%) children required PICU admission. Infants constituted 37.4% of total PICU admissions. Most common symptoms were respiratory (83.7%) followed by fever (60.5%). Fifteen (34.9%) infants presented with shock. Ten infants (23.3%) had myocardial dysfunction. C-reactive protein (CRP) and ferritin were high in 60.5 and 16.7% infants, respectively. Fourteen infants needed invasive mechanical ventilation. Nine patients had acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and five had MIS-C. However, 53.5% infants had different comorbidities. Four infants died and all of them had severe comorbidities. Respiratory distress (p = 0.009), pediatric sequential organ failure assessment score (p = 0.032) and number of ARDS cases (p = 0.044) were significantly higher in infants than noninfants. Infants are one of the most vulnerable groups of children suffering from serious illness from COVID-19 infection requiring PICU admission due to predominantly respiratory involvement. Overall outcome was good among infants without significant comorbidity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document