Treatment of Stable Intertrochanteric Fractures Using a Short Side Plate Dynamic Hip Screw

2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 309
Author(s):  
Chong Kwan Kim ◽  
Jin Woo Jin ◽  
Sung Won Jung ◽  
Wan Sub Kwak ◽  
Jae Il Jo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Side Plate ◽  
Short Side ◽  
Hip Screw ◽  
Plate Dynamic

scholarly journals Comparison between Conventional and Minimally Invasive Dynamic Hip Screws for Fixation of Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Femur

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mahmood ◽  
M. Kalra ◽  
M. K. Patralekh
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Technique ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Early Mobilization ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Minimally Invasive Technique ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Tissue Destruction ◽  
Side Plate ◽  
Hip Screw

Background. Intertrochanteric fractures of the proximal femur are one of the most common fractures encountered, and dynamic hip screw with a side plate is the standard treatment. We compared a minimally invasive surgical technique with the conventional surgical technique used in the fixation of intertrochanteric fractures with the dynamic hip screw (DHS) device. Methods. Thirty patients with such fractures were treated with the conventional open technique and 30 with a new minimally invasive technique. Patients in both groups were followed up for 1 year. Results. There was less blood loss, minimal soft tissue destruction, shorter hospital stay, and early mobilization with the minimally invasive technique. Conclusion. The present study finds minimally invasive technique superior to conventional (open) DHS.

scholarly journals A biomechanical comparison of the two- and four-hole side-plate dynamic hip screw in an osteoporotic composite femur model

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 230949901771719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominik Rog ◽  
Phillip Grigsby ◽  
Zachary Hill ◽  
William Pinette ◽  
Serkan Inceoglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Side Plate ◽  
Hip Screw ◽  
Biomechanical Comparison ◽  
Plate Dynamic

scholarly journals A study to assess proximal femoral nailing versus dynamic hip screw device in surgical management of intertrochanteric fractures: a comparative study

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
E. S. Radhe Shyam ◽  
K. Ashwin
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Trochanteric Fracture ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Technical Failure ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Fracture Management ◽  
Hip Screw

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> The incidence of inter trochanteric fracture is expected to have doubled by 2040. Inter trochanteric fractures account for about 45% to 50% of all hip fractures in the elderly populationand out of these, near about 50% to 60% are classified as unstable intertrochanteric fractures. The goal of treatment is restoring mobility safely and efficiently, while minimizing the risk of medical complications and technical failure. This study as performed<strong> </strong>to assess functional outcome with dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail in intertrochanteric fracture management.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> It was prospective observational study done for a period of 1year from January 2016-January 2017 among patients who attended OPD or emergency department with intertrochanteric fracture. Two different implants were used dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral nail (PFN).<strong></strong></p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Excellent results in functional outcome was more in case of PFN (66.6%) compared to DHS (50%). The type of trauma in DHS group was road traffic accident in 38.8%, domestic fall in 50% and others such as assault was in 11.1% while in PFN group intertrochanteric fracture was seen in 61.1% due to domestic fall.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The functional outcome was more better with proximal femoral nail (PFN) compared to dynamic hip screw (DHS). Therefore, proximal femoral nail (PFN) should be preferred for management of intertrochanteric fractures.</p>

scholarly journals Management of Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur by Minimally Invasive Dynamic Hip Screw

2014 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 68-72
Author(s):  
Dayanand M ◽  
◽  
Deepak S ◽  
Manoj Kumar ◽  
Vijay Kumar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Hip Screw

Dynamic Hip Screw versus Proximal Femoral Nail in the Management of Intertrochanteric Fractures - A Retrospective Analysis from Rajasthan

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (26) ◽  
pp. 2271-2277
Author(s):  
Gajanand Shriram Dhaked ◽  
Abhishek Komalsingh Jaroli ◽  
Khushboo Parmanand Malav ◽  
Harish Narayan Singh Rajpurohit
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Femoral Nail ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Hip Screw

BACKGROUND Current management of Intertrochanteric (IT) fractures has evolved with the introduction of dynamic hip screw (DHS) and proximal femoral nail (PFN). The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcomes between the DHS and PFN for IT fracture fixation. METHODS This study is a retrospective comparative analysis of 455 patients with IT fractures; DHS (292) and PFN (163), who were treated from June 2012 to June 2015. The patients were reviewed postoperatively for a minimum of 12 months to evaluate functional outcome using Salvati-Wilson score. Categorical data was present as absolute number or percentages, and parametric variables were presented as Mean ± SD, while non parametric data were presented as median. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05. RESULTS Intramedullary nails offer no advantage over extramedullary devices to treat IT fractures caused by low-energy trauma (AO 31 - A1). However, clinically significant outcomes were established for PFN group in terms of duration of surgery, x- ray exposure and SW Score for AO / OTA 31 - A2 and 31 - A3. Reoperations encountered for local pain due to implant prominence were significantly higher in the PFN group (4.90 % versus 1.02 %). Kaplan Meier survival probability of 69.3 % and 79.5 % predicted for DHS and PFN respectively, 3 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS Our conclusion reinforces indication for PFN in unstable IT fractures (31 - A2 and 31 - A3), owing to its better functional outcome and biomechanical properties. Functional outcomes for stable IT fracture (AO 31 - A1) were comparable between DHS and PFN, therefore final decision for implant choice depends on implant cost, surgeon’s preference for specific technique. However, understanding the morphology of proximal femur, peritrochanteric region is crucial to analyse the anatomical variations in Indian population which will provide the basis for intramedullary nail design modifications. KEYWORDS Intertrochanteric Fractures, DHS Fixation, PFN Fixation

scholarly journals Dynamic Hip Screw with Trochanter-Stabilizing Plate Compared with Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation as a Treatment for Unstable AO/OTA 31-A2 and 31-A3 Intertrochanteric Fractures

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Chun-Wei Fu ◽  
Ji-Ying Chen ◽  
Yueh-Ching Liu ◽  
Kuang-Wen Liao ◽  
Yung-Chang Lu
Keyword(s):  
Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Dynamic Hip Screw ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Residual Pain ◽  
Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture ◽  
Hip Screw ◽  
Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation ◽  
Im Nailing

Background. The dynamic hip screw (DHS) with the addition of an angular stable trochanter-stabilizing plate (TSP) has been considered the ideal treatment for the unstable intertrochanteric fracture type. However, there have been few comparisons between DHS+TSP augmentation with intramedullary (IM) nailing. The aim of this retrospectively registered study was to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with the unstable type of intertrochanteric fractures treated with DHS+TSP or IM nailing (proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA)). Methods. From June 2013 to April 2018, 358 patients with proximal femur fracture AO/OTA type 31A2 and 31A3 treated with PFNA or DHS+TSP and followed for ≥10 months postoperatively were included. The surgical-dependent outcome evaluation included the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative decrease in hemoglobin, and blood transfusion amount. Functional status was also measured. Radiographic findings and postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Result. The operation time was significantly shorter in the DHS+TSP group than that in the PFNA group for both A2 and A3 fractures (A2 type: 84.0 vs.96.4 min; p<0.05; A3 type: 102.4 vs.116.1 min; p<0.05). Postoperative decrease in hemoglobin was more significant in the PFNA group than that in the DHS+TSP group for both fracture types (A2 type: −1.88 vs. −1.29 (mg/dL); p<0.05; A3 type: −1.63 vs. −1.04 (mg/dL); p<0.05). However, the patients treated with DHS+TSP had significantly more residual pain than those treated with PFNA during the final follow-up (Visual Analog Scale score, A2 type: 28.4 vs.23.2; p<0.05; A3 type: 27.5 vs.23.6; p<0.05) and complained of greater implant irritation. Conclusion. We found that DHS+TSP was associated with less operation time and less postoperative decrease in hemoglobin but more residual pain and implant irritation than those of PFNA. As a treatment for unstable intertrochanteric fracture, DHS+TSP provided ideal surgical outcomes which were not inferior to the PFNA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document