Operative Treatment of the Femur Intertrochanteric Fracture Using the Gamma nail and the Compression Hip Screw

2001 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ju O Kim ◽  
Jae Il Oh ◽  
Sang Moon Yoo ◽  
Han Ki Lim
2001 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joon Soon Kang ◽  
Seung Rim Park ◽  
Hyung Soo Kim ◽  
Woo Hyeong Lee ◽  
Ki Wook Kim ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan-xiao Cheng ◽  
Xia Sheng

Abstract Background There are several surgical methods to treat intertrochanteric fracture: dynamic hip screw (DHS), compression hip screw (CHS), percutaneous compression plate (PCCP), Medoff sliding plate, less invasive stabilization system (LISS), Gamma nail, proximal femoral nail (PFN), and proximal femoral nail anti-rotating (PFNA). We therefore conducted a network meta-analysis to compare eight surgical interventions, including DHS, CHS, PCCP, Medoff sliding plate, LISS, Gamma nail, PFN, and PFNA, to provide the optimal surgical intervention for intertrochanteric fracture. Methods An electronic search of 4 databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and Web of Science) from inception to July 2020. Two or more of the eight surgical interventions, including the DHS, CHS, PCCP, Medoff sliding plate, LISS, Gamma nail, PFN, and PFNA, for intertrochanteric fracture were included. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias (ROB) tool. Network meta-analysis was conducted by using R-3.5.1 software with the help of package “gemtc”. The odd ratios (ORs) with 95% credibility interval (CrI) were used to assess complications and standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% CrI to calculate the continuous outcomes (operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and Harris hip score). Surfaces under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) were used to rank the intervention. Results A total of 36 RCTs were included in this study. The results of this network meta-analysis showed that, compared with the CHS and DHS group, PFNA exhibited a beneficial role in reducing the blood loss (SMD, 152.50; 95% CrI, 72.93 to 232.45; and SMD, 184.40; 95% CrI, 132.99 to 235.90, respectively). PFNA achieved the lowest value for the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) for the blood loss (SURCA = 0.072) and highest of Harris hip score (SURCA = 0.912). PCCP may have the lowest probability of the operative time (SURCA = 0.095). There were no significant differences among the eight surgical procedures in complications. Conclusion PFNA technique is the optimal treatment method for intertrochanteric fracture. Larger, longitudinal RCTs addressing current limitations, including sources of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision, are needed to provide more robust and consistent evidence.


1995 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 939
Author(s):  
Sung Keun Sohn ◽  
Seong Soo Kim ◽  
Jung Yoon Lee ◽  
Chul Hong Kim

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document