New in Conflict of Laws Regulation of Obligations Arising from Unjust Enrichment

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Shestakova
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Of Laws ◽  
Unjust Enrichment

The Characterization of Unjust Enrichment In the Conflict of Laws

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen G. A. Pitel
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Of Laws ◽  
Unjust Enrichment

The Conflict of Laws and Unjust Enrichment

2021 ◽  
pp. 175-198
Author(s):  
Andrew Burrows
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Choice Of Law ◽  
Conflict Of Laws ◽  
Unjust Enrichment ◽  
The Past ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Relationship

This essay revisits the relationship between the conflict of laws and the law of unjust enrichment (or, more widely, the law of restitution) in light of shifts in the legal landscape over the past forty years. It considers the rules of jurisdiction and of choice of law applied by the English courts, accounting for the effects of the UK’s departure from the European Union.

scholarly journals Recent Judicial Developments of Interest to Energy Lawyers

2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 427
Author(s):  
Colin Feasby ◽  
Simon Baines ◽  
Daina Kvisle
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Law ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Conflict Of Laws ◽  
Unjust Enrichment ◽  
Aboriginal Law

This article provides an overview of recent judicial developments of interest to energy lawyers. The authors summarize and provide commentary on recent Canadian case law in the areas of: Aboriginal law, administrative law, conflict of laws, contracts, environmental law, freehold leases, rights of first refusal, surface rights, unjust enrichment, and taxation.

Core Statutes On Conflict Of Laws 2018–19

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Maganaris
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Of Laws

“Farewell to Unjustified Enrichment?” – A Common Law Response

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 326-337
Author(s):  
Steve Hedley
Keyword(s):  
Common Law ◽  
German Law ◽  
Unjust Enrichment ◽  
Level Of Abstraction ◽  
The Law ◽  
Unjustified Enrichment ◽  
High Level ◽  
Logical Process

In this article, Professor Steve Hedley offers a Common Law response to he recently published arguments of Professor Nils Jansen on the German law of unjustified enrichment (as to which, see Jansen, “Farewell to Unjustified Enrichment” (2016) 20 EdinLR 123). The author takes the view that Jansen's paper provided a welcome opportunity to reconsider not merely what unjust enrichment can logically be, but what it is for. He argues that unjust enrichment talk contributes little of value, and that the supposedly logical process of stating it at a high level of abstraction, and then seeking to deduce the law from that abstraction, merely distracts lawyers from the equities of the cases they consider.

Conflict of Laws Bibliography: U.S. Sources, 2006-2007

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Symeon C. Symeonides
Keyword(s):  
Conflict Of Laws
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document