Environmental Chemicals in the Blood of Pregnant Women and Their Newborns from San Francisco

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 (1) ◽  
pp. 2740
Author(s):  
Rachel Morello-Frosch* ◽  
Tracey Woodruff* ◽  
Lara Cushing ◽  
Bill Jesdale ◽  
Jackie Schwartz ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (22) ◽  
pp. 12464-12472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Morello-Frosch ◽  
Lara J. Cushing ◽  
Bill M. Jesdale ◽  
Jackie M. Schwartz ◽  
Weihong Guo ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 47 (20) ◽  
pp. 11776-11784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ami R. Zota ◽  
Linda Linderholm ◽  
June-Soo Park ◽  
Myrto Petreas ◽  
Tan Guo ◽  
...  

Chemosphere ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 264 ◽  
pp. 128402
Author(s):  
Anna O. Lukina ◽  
Mandy Fisher ◽  
Cheryl Khoury ◽  
John Than ◽  
Mireille Guay ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1979 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 949-951
Author(s):  
Carol H. Leonard ◽  
Nancy Irvin ◽  
Roberta A. Ballard ◽  
Carolyn Ferris ◽  
Ronald Clyman

In an effort to shift the focus of hospital birth toward a more family-centered, natural process, an Alternative Birth Center (ABC) was opened in May 1976, at Mount Zion Hospital and Medical Center, San Francisco. Its purpose is to provide a safe, comfortable environment in which women can labor and deliver their infants.1 In order to also bring in families who would have had home births, the setting has been made as much like home as possible. Pregnant women may choose whom to have present at birth. In the ABC, as in other alternative birth settings, many parents are insisting on having their other children present at the birth of a sibling (New York Times, July 12, 1977, p 34; March 17, 1978, section 2, p 4).


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Abrahamsson ◽  
A. Wang ◽  
T. Jiang ◽  
M. Wang ◽  
R. Morello-Frosch ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 119 (6) ◽  
pp. 878-885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tracey J. Woodruff ◽  
Ami R. Zota ◽  
Jackie M. Schwartz

2021 ◽  
Vol 754 ◽  
pp. 142167
Author(s):  
Huan Chen ◽  
Wenxin Zhang ◽  
Yanqiu Zhou ◽  
Jiufeng Li ◽  
Hongzhi Zhao ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 749-757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Sophie Morisset ◽  
Hope A. Weiler ◽  
Lise Dubois ◽  
Jillian Ashley-Martin ◽  
Gabriel D. Shapiro ◽  
...  

Iron, vitamin D, and calcium intakes in the prenatal period are important determinants of maternal and fetal health. The objective of this study was to examine iron, vitamin D, and calcium intakes from diet and supplements in relation to maternal characteristics. Data were collected in a subsample of 1186 pregnant women from the Maternal–Infant Research on Environmental Chemicals (MIREC) Study, a cohort study including pregnant women recruited from 10 Canadian sites between 2008 and 2011. A food frequency questionnaire was administered to obtain rankings of iron, calcium, and vitamin D intake (16–21 weeks of pregnancy). Intakes from supplements were obtained from a separate questionnaire (6–13 weeks of pregnancy). Women were divided into 2 groups according to the median total intake of each nutrient. Supplement intake was an important contributor to total iron intake (median 74%, interquartile range (IQR) 0%–81%) and total vitamin D intake (median 60%, IQR 0%–73%), while the opposite was observed for calcium (median 18%, IQR 0%–27%). Being born outside of Canada was significantly associated with lower total intakes of iron, vitamin D, and calcium (p ≤ 0.01 for all). Consistent positive indicators of supplement use (iron, vitamin D, and calcium) were maternal age over 30 years and holding a university degree. In conclusion, among Canadian women, the probability of having lower iron, vitamin D, and calcium intakes is higher among those born outside Canada; supplement intake is a major contributor to total iron and vitamin D intakes; and higher education level and age over 30 years are associated with supplement intake.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucy S King ◽  
Daisy E. Feddoes ◽  
Jaclyn Schwartz Kirshenbaum ◽  
Kathryn Leigh Humphreys ◽  
Ian Gotlib

Pregnant women may be particularly sensitive to negative events (i.e., adversity) related to the COVID-19 pandemic and affective responses to these events (i.e., stress). We examined COVID-19-related stress and adversity in a sample of 725 pregnant women residing in the San Francisco Bay Area in March-May 2020, 343 of whom provided addresses in California that were geocoded and matched by census tract to measures of community-level risk factors. Women who were pregnant during the pandemic had substantially elevated depressive symptoms compared to matched women who were pregnant prior to the pandemic. Several individual- and community-level risk and protective factors were associated with women’s scores on two latent factors of COVID-19-related stress and adversity. Highlighting the role of subjective responses to the pandemic in vulnerability to prenatal depression and factors that influence susceptibility to COVID-19-related stress, these findings inform understanding of the psychosocial sequelae of disease outbreaks among pregnant women.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document