Perception of leakage: data from the Ostomy Life Study 2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (22) ◽  
pp. S4-S12
Author(s):  
Gillian Down ◽  
Martin Vestergaard ◽  
Teresa Adeltoft Ajslev ◽  
Esben Bo Boisen ◽  
Lene Feldskov Nielsen
Keyword(s):  

Background: Leakage is a common problem for people with a stoma. Aim: To investigate how people with a stoma and stoma care nurses perceive different patterns of effluent under the baseplate. Methods: The Ostomy Life Study 2019 included a user survey and a nurse survey covering experiences of leakage and the perception of leakage. Findings: Most people with a stoma perceived effluent reaching outside the baseplate as leakage (88–90%), whereas effluent close to the stoma only was not perceived as leakage by the majority (81–91%). Effluent covering major parts of the baseplate was perceived as leakage by most respondents with a colostomy or ileostomy (83%), whereas fewer respondents with a urostomy perceived this as leakage (57%). Most of the nurses (70%) did not perceive effluent close to the stoma as leakage. Conclusion: This study revealed that effluent confined to the area next to the stoma is generally not perceived as leakage.

WCET Journal ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 23-32
Author(s):  
Melanie C Perez

This case review discusses the importance of providing a holistic approach to the care of a patient with two stomas and an enterocutaneous fistula. In this case, the stomas and fistula significantly affected the patient; not just physically but emotionally and socially. The different challenges that arose in pouching a high-output ileostomy, enterocutaneous fistula and ileal conduit with Foley catheter in situ are explored. It also delves into the various options for discharging a patient with complex ostomy complications requiring different needs and resources. Finally, it aims to highlight the therapeutic comprehensive care the stomal therapy nurse provided to the patient and their family.


2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Amrein ◽  
Christian Muschitz ◽  
Doris Wagner ◽  
Thomas R Pieber ◽  
Heinrich Resch ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Dassie ◽  
Marco Rosson ◽  
Matteo Parolin ◽  
Lucia Russo ◽  
Sara Mazzocut ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bart Verkuil ◽  
Briana Brownlow ◽  
Michael Vasey ◽  
Jos F. Brosschot ◽  
Julian F. Thayer

Worry is a central process in a wide range of psychopathological and somatic conditions. Three studies (N = 856) were used to test whether a subscale composed of five items of the most commonly used trait anxiety questionnaire, Spielberger’s State Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait version (STAI-T), is appropriate to measure worry. Results showed that the subscale, named the Brief Worry Scale (BWS), had excellent internal consistency and temporal stability. Convergent and divergent validity were supported by correlation analyses using worry questionnaires and measures of anxious arousal and depression. The BWS was a particularly good predictor of the pathogenic aspects of worry, including worry perseveration in daily life (study 1), measures of clinical worry (study 2) and the uncontrollability of experimentally induced worry (study 3). Taken together, these studies demonstrate that the BWS might be a valuable scale for pathological worry, for which many researchers already have data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document