Short-Term Clinical Results of Porous Tantalum Monoblock Patella in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Analysis of Two-Dimensionally Osteomorphometry

Abstract BackgroundUnicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an established treatment option for patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA). However, strict patient selection is crucial for its success. The proposed advantages include nearly natural knee kinematics, faster rehabilitation and better functional outcomes. Despite these facts and it’s proven cost-effectiveness, there are hesitations for the use of UKA as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Key objectives of this study were therefore to assess clinical and patient-reported-outcome (PRO) as well as patient’s satisfaction after medial UKA in comparison to TKA. MethodsTo assess the outcome after UKA we conducted a prospective multi-center study. 116 patients with unicompartmental OA and indication for UKA were included. Overall 54 females and 62 males with an average age of 62.7 years (±9.8) and an average body mass index (BMI) of 29.2 (± 3.7) were recruited. Clinical results and PRO were assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS). Follow-ups took place 3 months, 1 and 2 years after surgery including clinical examination, radiographs, assessment of PRO and adverse events. Pain and satisfaction were evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0 (worst) to 10 (best)).For comparison with TKA a propensity score matched-pair analysis was performed to eliminate confounders. Matching criteria were gender, patient´s age, BMI and comorbidities. A total of 116 matched-pairs were analysed. ResultsThere was no revision in the UKA group until 2 years after surgery. Revision rates were higher in the TKA group (0.6%).Preoperative KSS-Scores were higher within the UKA cohort (p < 0.001). After surgical treatment, PROMs displayed a significant improvement (p < 0,001) in both cohorts. Regarding the Knee-Score (Pain, Alignment, ROM) we observed no differences between cohorts after 12 months. The Function-Score demonstrated significantly better results in the UKA cohort (UKA vs. TKA 95 vs 80, p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was higher in UKA patients (UKA vs TKA 9.0 vs 8.8, p = 0.019).ConclusionPatients of both cohorts showed high satisfaction after knee arthroplasty. UKA resulted in higher function scores compared to TKA without increased revision rate during short-term follow-up. Therefore, UKA is a good treatment option for unicompartmental OA. Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov, NCT04598568. Registered 22 October 2020 - Retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT04598568?cond=balanSys+Uni&draw=2&rank=1

Download Full-text

Better short-term function after unicompartmental compared to total knee arthroplasty

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders ◽

10.1186/s12891-021-04185-w ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Eric Tille ◽

Franziska Beyer ◽

Kai Auerbach ◽

Marco Tinius ◽

Jörg Lützner

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Treatment Option ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Clinical Results ◽

Matched Pair ◽

Short Term ◽

Patient’S Satisfaction ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Total Knee ◽

Matching Criteria

Abstract Background Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is an established treatment option for patients with unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA). However, strict patient selection is crucial for its success. The proposed advantages include nearly natural knee kinematics, faster rehabilitation and better functional outcomes. Despite the aforementioned facts and it’s proven cost-effectiveness, there are still hesitations for the use of UKA as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Key objectives of this study were therefore to assess clinical and patient-reported outcome (PRO) as well as patient’s satisfaction after medial UKA in comparison to TKA. Methods To assess the outcome after UKA we conducted a prospective multi-center study. 116 patients with unicompartmental OA and indication for UKA were included. Overall 54 females and 62 males with an average age of 62.7 years (±9.8) and an average body mass index (BMI) of 29.2 (± 3.7) were recruited. Clinical results and PRO were assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS). Follow-ups took place 3 months, 1 and 2 years after surgery including clinical examination, radiographs, assessment of PRO and adverse events. Pain and satisfaction was evaluated using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0 (worst) to 10 (best)). For comparison with TKA a propensity score matched-pair analysis was performed to eliminate confounders. Matching criteria were gender, patient’s age, BMI and comorbidities. A total of 116 matched-pairs were analysed. Results There was no revision in the UKA group until 2 years after surgery. Revision rates were higher in the TKA group (0.6%). Preoperative KSS-Scores were higher within the UKA cohort (p < 0.001). After surgical treatment, PROMs displayed a significant improvement (p < 0,001) in both cohorts. Regarding the Knee-Score (Pain, Alignment, ROM) we observed no differences between cohorts after 12 months. The Function-Score demonstrated significantly better results in the UKA cohort (UKA vs. TKA 95 vs 80, p < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was also higher in UKA patients (UKA vs TKA 9.0 vs 8.8, p = 0.019). Conclusion Patients of both cohorts showed high satisfaction after knee arthroplasty. UKA resulted in higher function scores compared to TKA without increased revision rate during short-term follow-up. Therefore, UKA is a good treatment option for unicompartmental OA. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04598568. Registered 22 October 2020 - Retrospectively registered.

Download Full-text

Soft Tissue Envelope Preserving Technique for Computer Navigated Total Knee Arthroplasty

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine ◽

10.1177/2325967117s00157 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 5 (5_suppl5) ◽

pp. 2325967117S0015

Author(s):

Gavin Clark ◽

Luke Mooney

Keyword(s):

Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Patient Satisfaction ◽

Soft Tissue ◽

Knee Arthroplasty ◽

Mechanical Axis ◽

Computer Navigation ◽

Clinical Results ◽

Short Term ◽

Soft Tissue Envelope ◽

Total Knee

Objectives: Current techniques in Total Knee Arthroplasty(TKA) are utilitarian in that all patients are recommended to have the same alignment of neutral mechanical axis. It has been well established that the population has a varied natural alignment with less than 20% of patients naturally neutral. The ability to predictably individualise alignment for patients is hypothesised to result in greater patient satisfaction. This technique aims to modify mechanical axis technique to consider an individual’s soft tissue constraints. Methods: Soft Tissue Envelope Preserving (STEP) is an operative technique for performing TKA that utilises the soft tissue data obtained intra-operatively from computer navigation registration to determine the optimal alignment to provide balanced positioning of implants without the need for soft tissue releases. Hence balance is achieved through bone cuts rather than altering the patient’s soft tissue balance. The technique will be described in detail. Results: The last 100 patients performed with complete data sets including navigation files and both pre-op and one year post operative outcome measures were reviewed. The spread of overall alignments and bony resections have been compiled with no outliers outside 5 degrees of neutral. The clinical results were comparable with other series and patient satisfaction of greater than 90% was reported. There were no MCL or LCL releases performed. Ilio-tibial band partial releases were the only reported soft tissue releases made. Conclusions: This technique is a safe and effective method of performing TKA with good short term outcomes. It minimises the use of soft tissue releases by utilising the patient’s own soft tissue envelope to balance the knee whilst maintaining the basic principles of a measured resection mechanical axis technique. It has resulted in excellent patient satisfaction in the short term.

Download Full-text