scholarly journals The spanwise non-uniformity of nominally two-dimensional turbulent boundary layer : 2nd Report Wall shear stress and flow field

1975 ◽  
Vol 18 (121) ◽  
pp. 673-680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshimasa FURUYA ◽  
Ikuo NAKAMURA ◽  
Hideo OSAKA ◽  
Hideo HONDA
1982 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 156-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. McAllister ◽  
F. J. Pierce ◽  
M. H. Tennant

Preston tubes provide a convenient means of estimating local wall shear stress. Practical difficulties arise from a lack of calibration data obtained in turbulent boundary layer flows and from the wide choice of calibration equations available mainly from pipe flow calibrations. The results of an experimental study comparing a large number of direct force local wall shear stress measurements in a near-zero pressure gradient two-dimensional turbulent boundary layer flow are presented. The results indicate that there is consistent and excellent agreement between the Patel intermediate calibration formula and the direct force measurements. Typical differences among the direct force measurements and several other proposed calibration equations are also shown.


1951 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 95-100
Author(s):  
Donald Ross ◽  
J. M. Robertson

Abstract As an interim solution to the problem of the turbulent boundary layer in an adverse pressure gradient, a super-position method of analysis has been developed. In this method, the velocity profile is considered to be the result of two effects: the wall shear stress and the pressure recovery. These are superimposed, yielding an expression for the velocity profiles which approximate measured distributions. The theory also leads to a more reasonable expression for the wall shear-stress coefficient.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document